Abstract
The pressure on healthcare is increasing worldwide. The trend toward digitalization in recent decades and the emergence of modern technologies have enabled remote treatment and offered patients new ways to interact with physicians. Despite numerous studies showing promising results in the use of video calls for primary care consultations, some survey studies report lingering doubts about the effectiveness of this method among general practitioners (GPs) and patients. Because the organization of health care varies widely across countries, we set out to investigate the appropriateness of video calling in a Dutch health care setting. Unlike many survey studies, we collected real-life data where GPs evaluated the video call directly after the consultation, allowing a more realistic assessment of perceived quality. We find that video calls are appropriate 84.2% (95% CI 80.3%-87.8%) of the time for consultations with patients of moderate to low urgency. Importantly, the appropriateness of video calls decreased with increasing urgency. These results build on previous studies and confirm the positive use cases of video calls focused on primary care in the Netherlands.
Competing Interest Statement
Both authors work for a company (Quin B.V.) that provides a software platform for primary care clinics where video calling is one of the functionalities.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was waived by Centrale Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek (CCMO) on the patient side since we collected no demographics information. Consent was obtained on the GP side
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
e.luiten{at}quin.md
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
