Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Synthesizing evidence on the impacts of COVID-19 regulatory changes on methadone treatment for opioid use disorder: Implications for U.S. federal policy

View ORCID ProfileNoa Krawczyk, Bianca D. Rivera, Emily Levin, Bridget C.E. Dooling
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.15.22283533
Noa Krawczyk
1Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy (COEP), Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York NY
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Noa Krawczyk
  • For correspondence: noa.krawczyk{at}nyulangone.org
Bianca D. Rivera
1Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy (COEP), Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York NY
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily Levin
2Regulatory Studies Center, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bridget C.E. Dooling
2Regulatory Studies Center, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C.
JD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

As the U.S. faces a worsening overdose crisis, improving access to evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) remains a central policy priority. Federal regulatory changes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic significantly expanded flexibilities on take-home doses for methadone treatment for OUD. These changes have fueled critical questions about the impact of new regulations on OUD outcomes, and the potential health impact of permanently integrating these flexibilities into treatment policy going forward. To aide US policy makers as they consider implementing permanent methadone regulatory changes, we conducted a review synthesizing peer-reviewed research evidence on the impact of the COVID-19 methadone-take-home flexibilities on methadone program operations, OUD patient and provider experiences, and patient health outcomes. We interpret this evidence in the context of the federal rulemaking process and discuss avenues by which these important findings can be incorporated and implemented into U.S. substance use treatment policy going forward.

Competing Interest Statement

Dr. Krawczyk provides expert testimony in ongoing opioid litigation

Funding Statement

This work was supported by a grant from the Pew Charitable Trusts

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 16, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Synthesizing evidence on the impacts of COVID-19 regulatory changes on methadone treatment for opioid use disorder: Implications for U.S. federal policy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Synthesizing evidence on the impacts of COVID-19 regulatory changes on methadone treatment for opioid use disorder: Implications for U.S. federal policy
Noa Krawczyk, Bianca D. Rivera, Emily Levin, Bridget C.E. Dooling
medRxiv 2022.12.15.22283533; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.15.22283533
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Synthesizing evidence on the impacts of COVID-19 regulatory changes on methadone treatment for opioid use disorder: Implications for U.S. federal policy
Noa Krawczyk, Bianca D. Rivera, Emily Levin, Bridget C.E. Dooling
medRxiv 2022.12.15.22283533; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.15.22283533

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Addiction Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)