Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A realist interview study of a participatory public mental health project “#KindnessByPost”

Hannah Rachel Scott, Katey Warran, Kathleen Fraser, Beverley Chipp, Gail McGinnes, Mike Towers, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans, View ORCID ProfileLuke Sheridan Rains
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283620
Hannah Rachel Scott
1Division of Psychiatry, University College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katey Warran
2WHO Collaborating Centre for Arts & Health, Social Biobehavioural Research Group, University College London
3School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen Fraser
1Division of Psychiatry, University College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beverley Chipp
1Division of Psychiatry, University College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gail McGinnes
1Division of Psychiatry, University College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mike Towers
1Division of Psychiatry, University College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
1Division of Psychiatry, University College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luke Sheridan Rains
1Division of Psychiatry, University College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Luke Sheridan Rains
  • For correspondence: l.sheridanrains{at}ucl.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background #KindnessByPost (KbP) is a participatory public health initiative in which people anonymously send and receive cards containing messages of goodwill with others also taking part in the programme. Quantitative evaluations of KbP consistently find evidence of improvements to people’s mental wellbeing and feelings of loneliness after participation and three months later. Our aim in the present study is to develop a programme theory of KbP, which describes for whom the KbP intervention improves mental wellbeing, other reported impacts, in which contexts it has these effects, and the mechanisms by which it works

Methods We use a realist interviewing methodology to develop the programme theory. We conducted a focus group with the KbP executive team, and 20 one-to-one interviews with KbP participants. During analysis, a co-production working group iteratively developed a Theory of Change model comprising context-mechanism-outcome statements [CMOs] to map out the mechanisms present in KbP.

Results We developed 145 CMO statements, which we condensed and categorized into 32 overarching CMOs across nine thematic topics: access to scheme; pathways to involvement; resources; culture; giving post; receiving post; content of received post; community; long term impact. These CMOs set out pathways through which KbP benefited participants, including from doing something kind for someone else, of receiving post and appreciating the effort that went into it, and from the creative process of creating post and writing the messages inside them. Effects were sustained in part through people keeping the cards and through the social media communities that emerged around KbP.

Discussion Both giving and receiving post and the sense of community benefited participants and improved their mood and feelings of connectedness with others. Connection with a stranger, rather than friends and family, was also an important feature of the initiative for participants. Our wide range of CMO pathways by which KbP produced positive outcomes may mean that the intervention is applicable or adaptable across many communities and settings. Taken together with evidence from the quantitative evaluations, KbP is potentially an effective, low-cost, and highly scalable public health intervention for reducing loneliness and improving wellbeing.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This project has been funded by the Loneliness & Social Isolation in Mental Health Research Network (549210/Rains), which is funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) (Grant reference: ES/S004440/1) and their support is gratefully acknowledged. Any views expressed here are those of the project investigators and do not necessarily represent the views of the Loneliness & Social Isolation in Mental Health Research Network or UKRI.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by the UCL Research Ethics Committee (ref: 14649/004)

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 19, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A realist interview study of a participatory public mental health project “#KindnessByPost”
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A realist interview study of a participatory public mental health project “#KindnessByPost”
Hannah Rachel Scott, Katey Warran, Kathleen Fraser, Beverley Chipp, Gail McGinnes, Mike Towers, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans, Luke Sheridan Rains
medRxiv 2022.12.17.22283620; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283620
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A realist interview study of a participatory public mental health project “#KindnessByPost”
Hannah Rachel Scott, Katey Warran, Kathleen Fraser, Beverley Chipp, Gail McGinnes, Mike Towers, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans, Luke Sheridan Rains
medRxiv 2022.12.17.22283620; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283620

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)