Abstract
Introduction With the global spread of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and public health crisis, appropriate allocation of healthcare human resources has been necessitated. Although nursing practice takes up a larger part of medical practice in hospitals, the quantitative assessment of nursing care has not been investigated for human resource allocation in the medical field. The objective of this study to explore the time spent for each nursing intervention, and compared provided amount of nursing intervention between negative pressure isolation wards (NPIWs) and general wards (GWs) provided by COVID-19 hub hospitals.
Methods This research is a time-motion (TM) observational study. Three trained external observers recorded their observations for every minute in 19 different work schedules in 2 NPIWs and 2 general respiratory wards. Observation items were chosen based on the standard operating guidelines of Integrated Nursing and Caring Services developed by the Ministry of Health and Welfare and National Health Insurance Service. The average nursing workload per shift was compared by calculating the sum of the spent time of three nurses staffed in each shift in each ward between two groups. In addition, to compare the amount of directed nursing care for patients between two types of wards, nursing work category was divided into directed and undirected nursing interventions.
Results In the comparison of demographic characteristics of nursing workforce between two groups, there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05 respectively). In both groups, the most time-consuming nursing work category was recording in three work shifts. The average duration of those work tasks was 312.5 minutes in NPIWs and 307 minutes (per 3 nurses) in GWs, having no significant difference (p>0.05). Of all nurse duties, the second most time-consuming work category was others (including changing to protective clothing) in NPIWs, and medication administration and transfusion in GWs. The mean duration of performing the category for others that include wearing PPE was 308 minutes in NPIWs and 160 minutes (per 3 nurses) in GWs, showing a significant difference (p<0.05). The greater amount of time was taken for hygiene management in isolation wards. Medication administration and transfusion and nursing assessment were more frequently performed in GWs, demonstrating a statistical significance. In the aggregated spent time for all duties including directed and undirected nursing care, the time spent for directed nursing care was 654 minutes longer in GWs than in NPIWs (per 3 nurses) in each work shift, displaying a significant difference.
Conclusion This study provides the quantitative difference in time-consuming nursing works between NPIWs and GWs by direct observation. Recording was the most time-consuming nursing work category in both NPIWs and GWs. Considering nurses in each duty in GWs provided more directed nursing care than nurse in NIPWs, careful considerations are required in allocation of nursing workforce.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by supported by Small and Medium Hospital Nursing Association and Gyeonggi-do Nurses Association in 2022 (No. 202206-14).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Advanced Clinical Trial Center of Bestian Hospital (IRB No. 2022-02-003-004).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Not available
Abbreviation
- COVID-19
- Coronavirus Disease 2019
- GW
- General Wards
- IRB
- Institutional Review Board
- NPIW
- Negative Pressure Isolation Wards
- SD
- Standard Deviation
