Abstract
Isolating COVID-19 cases and quarantining their close contacts can prevent COVID-19 transmissions but also inflict harm. We analysed isolation and quarantine orders by the local public health agency in Berlin-Reinickendorf (Germany) and their dependence on the recommendations by the Robert Koch Institute, the national public health institute. Between 3 March 2020 and 18 December 2021 the local public health agency ordered 24603 isolations and 45014 quarantines (mean contacts per case 1.9). More days of quarantine per 100 inhabitants were ordered for children than for adults: 4.1 for children aged 0-6, 5.2 for children aged 7-17, 0.9 for adults aged 18-64 and 0.3 for elderly aged 65-110. The mean duration for isolation orders was 10.2 and for quarantine orders 8.2 days. We calculated a delay of 4 days between contact and quarantine order. 3484 of contact persons were in quarantine when they developed an infection. Our study quantifies isolation and quarantine orders, shows that children had been ordered to quarantine more than adults and that there were fewer school days lost to isolation or quarantine as compared to school closures. Our results indicate that the recommendations of the Robert Koch Institute had an influence on isolation and quarantine duration as well as contact identification and that the local public health agency was not able to provide rigorous contact tracing, as the mean number of contacts was lower than expected.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://github.com/jakobschumacher/quarantine-isolation-analysis
Funding Statement
Jakob Schumacher received no specific funding for this work. Lisa Kuehne, Sophia Bruessermann, Benjamin Geisler and Sonja Jaeckle were funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, Project EsteR, Funding Code: 13GW0542).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This work was conducted as part of the surveillance work of the local public health agency. Institutional review board approval and informed consent were not required. Data protection approval was given by the local agency data protection unit. The data is publically available at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jakobschumacher/quarantine-isolation-analysis/master/data/raw_data_survnet.csv
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All code and data-files are available from the github repository https://github.com/jakobschumacher/quarantine-isolation-analysis
https://github.com/jakobschumacher/quarantine-isolation-analysis
