Abstract
Background One in three people worldwide will experience chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP). Due to the long-standing nature of CMP, it is inevitable that people with CMP will have to engage in some form of self-management. As highlighted by multiple clinical practice guidelines, it becomes pivotal that healthcare professionals provide effective self-management support. However, the current effectiveness of self-management interventions seems equivocal. This may be due to self-management interventions not being developed based on an in-depth understanding of the self-management challenges experienced by people with CMP.
Objectives This study explored the everyday barriers and facilitators for self-management experienced by people with CMP currently undergoing rehabilitation in a municipality setting.
Methods We conducted 11 one-time, single-person, qualitative interviews of people living with CMP. The interviews were based on a semi-structured interview guide with open-ended questions and analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis to identify the participants experienced barriers and facilitators for self-management in everyday situations.
Findings Three overarching barriers emerged: 1) biographical disruption, 2) uncertainty and psychological distress, and 3) lack of social support. Further, three overarching facilitators emerged: 1) acceptance and optimism 2) pain-relieving strategies and 3) social support. These barriers and facilitators far exceeded participants capability to control their pain.
Conclusion The majority of the barriers and facilitators concerned the management of cognitive, emotional, social or personal consequences of CMP. Integrating these barriers and facilitators into the development of future self-management interventions may have the potential to improve the effectiveness of these interventions.
Significance Qualitative studies exploring self-management of chronic pain traditionally focus on identification of barriers for pain-management. This study identified several interconnected barriers and facilitators which influenced CMP patients’ everyday self-management. This provided targets for designing self-management interventions to support patients pain-related, psychological, and social self-management practices in everyday contexts.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Regional ethical committee of Northeren Jutland, which waived requirement for full ethical approval
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Journal: EJP, European Journal of Pain.
Funding sources: None to declare.
Conflicts of interests: All authors declare no potential conflicts of interest in relation to the research, findings, authorship and/or publication of this article.
What’s known/new: Self-management is an essential part of rehabilitation for chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP). Current self-management interventions show ambiguous effects. Most self-management interventions for CMP are developed for pain management, with no consideration for CMP patient’s challenges during their everyday life. Our qualitative interviews outlined how people with CMP’s’ challenges far exceeded managing their pain and identified three barriers and three facilitators for everyday self-management. This provides targets for adjusting self-management interventions to address the biopsychosocial aspects of managing CMP.
Statement of responsibility: See the attached model for an overview of author contributions, distributed across tasks. As illustrated below, all co-authors have read and approved the draft prior to publication.
Data Availability
The data obtained during this study contains person sensitive information and will not be made publicly available to shield participants identities and ensure compliance with the EUGDPR
