Abstract
Aim The aim of this rapid review was to investigate whether lifestyle coaching could provide a cost-effective alternative to counselling for the UK National Health Service (NHS) treatment of common mental health conditions such as stress, anxiety and depression.
Methods A rapid review approach was used to determine the evidence of health economics evaluations in the field of mental health services. A literature search of PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ASSIA, PsycINFO and MEDLINE produced 2807 articles. We removed 778 duplicates, and 2029 study articles remained. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts (RG and KP), and 37 papers met the inclusion criteria of this review. Following a full-text screening, a further 27 papers were excluded due to lack of relevance. Study designs which did not include economic evaluations (n=15) or did not include an evaluation treatment of mental health conditions with talking therapies (n=15) did not meet the inclusion criteria. Ten papers were included in the final rapid review.
Results The database search yielded study articles which focused on the cost-effectiveness of counselling and other talking therapies such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT). No literature was found to determine the cost-effectiveness, or effectiveness of lifestyle coaching. Due to a lack of economic evaluations, this review could not determine the potential cost-effectiveness of lifestyle coaching as a means of addressing the backlog for mental health support such as counselling in the NHS.
Conclusion This review highlights the research gap in assessing the cost-effectiveness of lifestyle coaching for treating common mental health disorders. The proposed next step is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle coaching versus current treatment as usual (counselling) by using a feasibility randomised control trial.
Paper type A rapid review
Strengths and limitations of this study
This rapid review found a range of different economic evaluations of mental health interventions for common mental health issues.
All of the study articles found were moderate to high quality, some of the included study articles met all of the checklist criteria.
This rapid review found no evidence from a UK study setting. However, all study articles came from OECD countries that share similar legal structures and policies with comparable populations.
Despite being mentioned in a number of studies, it is unclear what treatment as usual refers to, and is perhaps not as usual as the studies suggest.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
a.makanjuola{at}bangor.ac.uk
rachel.granger{at}bangor.ac.uk
Kalpa.pisavadia{at}bangor.ac.uk
R.t.edwards{at}bangor.ac.uk
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
Abbreviations
- ACT
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
- ADHD
- Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
- CBA
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- CBT
- Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
- CEA
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis
- CI
- Confidence Interval
- CMHT
- Community Mental Health Team
- CORE-OM
- Clinical outcomes routine evaluation - outcome measure
- COPE
- Creating Opportunities for Personal Empowerment
- CVM
- Contingent valuation method
- GAD-7
- Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment
- HAM-D
- Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
- HrQoL
- Health-Related Quality of Life
- iSMI
- (guided) internet and mobile-supported occupational stress-management intervention
- ISTDP
- Intensive Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy
- JBI
- Joanna-Briggs Institute
- KRW
- South Korean Won
- KKL
- Korte Klachten Lijst (translates in English to Short Symptom List)
- OECD
- Organisation for Co-operation and Development
- PSS-10
- Perceived stress scale
- PTSD
- Post-traumatic stress disorder
- QALY
- Quality Adjusted life year
- SSWIC
- Single Session Walk-in Therapy
- TAU
- Treatment as Usual
- TF-CBT
- trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy
- WDI
- Workplace dialogue intervention
- WLC
- Waitlist Control
- WTP
- Willingness to pay
