Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

COVision: Convolutional Neural Network for the Differentiation of COVID-19 from Common Pulmonary Conditions Using CT Scans

Kush V. Parikh, Timothy J. Mathew
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.22.23284880
Kush V. Parikh
1Troy High School, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kushparikh5{at}gmail.com
Timothy J. Mathew
1Troy High School, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

With the growing amount of COVID-19 cases, especially in developing countries with limited medical resources, it is essential to accurately and efficiently diagnose COVID-19. Due to characteristic ground-glass opacities (GGOs) and other types of lesions being present in both COVID-19 and other acute lung diseases, misdiagnosis occurs often — 26.6% of the time in manual interpretations of CT scans. Current deep-learning models can identify COVID-19 but cannot distinguish it from other common lung diseases like bacterial pneumonia. Concretely, COVision is a deep-learning model that can differentiate COVID-19 from other common lung diseases, with high specificity using CT scans and other clinical factors. COVision was designed to minimize overfitting and complexity by decreasing the number of hidden layers and trainable parameters while still achieving superior performance. Our model consists of two parts: the CNN which analyzes CT scans and the CFNN (clinical factors neural network) which analyzes clinical factors such as age, gender, etc. Using federated averaging, we ensembled our CNN with the CFNN to create a comprehensive diagnostic tool. After training, our CNN achieved an accuracy of 95.8% and our CFNN achieved an accuracy of 88.75% on a validation set. We found a statistical significance that COVision performs better than three independent radiologists with at least 10 years of experience, especially in differentiating COVID-19 from pneumonia. We analyzed our CNN’s activation maps through Grad-CAMs and found that lesions in COVID-19 presented peripherally, closer to the pleura, whereas pneumonia lesions presented centrally.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

1) Consortium of Chest CT Image Investigation (CC-CCII) Dataset: http://ncov-ai.big.ac.cn/download?lang=en 2) Khorshid COVID Cohort (KCC): https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16682422.v1 3) Israeli Ministry of Health: https://data.gov.il/dataset/covid-19/resource/74216e15-f740-4709-adb7-a6fb0955a048 The CT Scans of COVID-19, pneumonia, and healthy patients were obtained from the China Consortium of Chest CT Image Investigation (CC-CCII) dataset. Ground truth for the CC-CCII dataset was established via serology tests and confirmed by laboratory findings. Clinical factors for COVID-19 and pneumonia patients were obtained from the Khorshid COVID Cohort (KCC). Clinical factors for healthy patients were obtained from the Israeli Ministry of Health public dataset. We compiled all the clinical factors data into a CSV file using the pandas and NumPy libraries in Python. We removed the clinical factors from the dataset that were not one of the following: shortness of breath, cough, headache, fever, sore throat, age, and gender. We binarized the ages of the patients by having a threshold age of 60 years (1 assigned to age if the age is greater than 60 years, 0 assigned if the age is less than 60 years).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • The manuscript has been revised for the following reasons: 1) The original introduction highlights the significance of identifying COVID-19 cases through CT images. However, it doesn't provide a clear and brief statement of the research question and hypothesis. 2) The methodology section lacked technical details, creating a gap in the paper's depth. It only offered a general overview of the deep learning process, while omitting vital specifics essential for reproducibility and result evaluation. For instance: “The numbers of COVID-19, pneumonia, and healthy slices within the 194,922 isolated CT slices were unspecified. Therefore, it is unclear whether duplicated slices are present in the stratified random samples of 35,000 COVID-19, 35,000 pneumonia, and 35,000 healthy slices, respectively. A similar uncertainty surrounds the clinical factors (features).” 3) There was an inconsistency between the numbers presented in Table 1 and those mentioned in the accompanying text. 4) The ROC curves should've been presented individually for each class, rather than combining all classes together. 5) When comparing the performance of the CNN with that of independent board-certified radiologists, metrics such as AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and other classification-specific measures should've been used instead of a t-test.

Data Availability

All data produced are available online at: 1) Consortium of Chest CT Image Investigation (CC-CCII) Dataset: http://ncov-ai.big.ac.cn/download?lang=en 2) Khorshid COVID Cohort (KCC): https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16682422.v1 3) Israeli Ministry of Health: https://data.gov.il/dataset/covid-19/resource/74216e15-f740-4709-adb7-a6fb0955a048

http://ncov-ai.big.ac.cn/download?lang=en

https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16682422.v1

https://data.gov.il/dataset/covid-19/resource/74216e15-f740-4709-adb7-a6fb0955a048

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 23, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
COVision: Convolutional Neural Network for the Differentiation of COVID-19 from Common Pulmonary Conditions Using CT Scans
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
COVision: Convolutional Neural Network for the Differentiation of COVID-19 from Common Pulmonary Conditions Using CT Scans
Kush V. Parikh, Timothy J. Mathew
medRxiv 2023.01.22.23284880; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.22.23284880
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
COVision: Convolutional Neural Network for the Differentiation of COVID-19 from Common Pulmonary Conditions Using CT Scans
Kush V. Parikh, Timothy J. Mathew
medRxiv 2023.01.22.23284880; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.22.23284880

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Radiology and Imaging
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)