Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A quasi-experimental study to compare effectiveness of a breastfeeding arm sling with normal breastfeeding cross-cradle hold position

View ORCID ProfilePornsri Disorntatiwat, View ORCID ProfileMary Steen, View ORCID ProfileSudjit Liblub
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.24.23284943
Pornsri Disorntatiwat
1Ramathibodi School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pornsri Disorntatiwat
Mary Steen
2Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Northumbria, The United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mary Steen
  • For correspondence: mary.steen{at}northumbria.ac.uk
Sudjit Liblub
1Ramathibodi School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sudjit Liblub
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Breastfeeding has many benefits for the newborn and mother therefore, the World Health Organization guidelines recommend exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months, with continued breastfeeding for up to two years. However, exclusive breastfeeding rates in the first 6 months in Thailand were reported to be approximately, 14% in 2019. Research has highlighted that many mothers’ have a lack of belief in their ability to breastfeed, and some physical conditions, such as tiredness and difficulty continually holding their baby in a comfortable position. Additionally, first-time breastfeeding can contribute to mothers having difficulties breastfeeding during the early postnatal period. Therefore, the Arm sling innovation (device) has been designed to provide support and comfort whilst holding the newborn. This study compared the effectiveness of the breastfeeding arm sling innovation to support breastfeeding in cross-cradle hold position and normal cross-cradle hold position breastfeeding in first-time mothers. A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest research design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of breastfeeding before and after the intervention among first-time mothers in the postnatal unit, at Ramathibodi hospital, Thailand. A total of 46 postpartum mothers participated in the study. The results showed that the effectiveness of breastfeeding reported by mothers between using a normal cross-cradle hold position and using breastfeeding arm sling innovation was statistically significantly different (t = 4.32, P < 0.001) with helping to hold the baby securely without slipping (t=5.68, p<0.001) and mothers can continue to breastfeed (t=2.09, p <0.001). Majority of mothers were satisfied with the support of using the breastfeeding arm sling innovation design. The breastfeeding arm sling innovation contributes to the effectiveness of breastfeeding by assisting and supporting the mother and baby’s position to breastfeed more comfortably, thus assisting first-time mothers to feel comfortable, confident, and able to continue breastfeeding.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

NA

Funding Statement

Financial Disclosure Statement PD, SL, and MS received internal grant funding. Funding Sources: Ramathibodi School of Nursing Funds, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand. Grant number 01102021, https://www.rama.mahidol.ac.th/nursing/en. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics Committee on Human Subjects of the Faculty of Medicine at Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand (IRB COA. MURA2021/949), in line with the Human Research Protection such as Declaration of Helsinki, The Belmont Report, and the International Conference on Harmonization in Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data without restrctions will be available

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 25, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A quasi-experimental study to compare effectiveness of a breastfeeding arm sling with normal breastfeeding cross-cradle hold position
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A quasi-experimental study to compare effectiveness of a breastfeeding arm sling with normal breastfeeding cross-cradle hold position
Pornsri Disorntatiwat, Mary Steen, Sudjit Liblub
medRxiv 2023.01.24.23284943; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.24.23284943
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A quasi-experimental study to compare effectiveness of a breastfeeding arm sling with normal breastfeeding cross-cradle hold position
Pornsri Disorntatiwat, Mary Steen, Sudjit Liblub
medRxiv 2023.01.24.23284943; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.24.23284943

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Nutrition
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)