Challenges in the distribution of antimicrobial medications in community dispensaries in Accra, Ghana

Study setting and context

Data was collected in November and December 2021 throughout 17 neighborhoods in the Greater Accra Region.

As the capital of Ghana, the coastal city of Accra serves as a cosmopolitan node in the network of human and capital flows throughout West Africa. Medicine vendors in Accra are reported to be the primary source of medicine dispensation in Ghana, and in West Africa at large [51, 52]. The city is densely populated and growing each year, a result of regional migration and rapid urbanization [53]. Many of Ghana’s hospitals are located in Accra, and within the city these hospitals are predominantly concentrated in wealthier neighborhoods, a result of colonial segregation and its persistent ramifications in Ghana’s development [26]. Hospitals are reported to be overburdened and crowded, and users describe unexpected fees throughout the care process [54]. The rate of 2.65 doctors, nurses, and midwives per 1,000 members of the population [55] is less than that of the WHO recommendations of 4.45 per 1,000 [56]. Partially as a result, a network of at least 4,198 registered pharmacies and 20,326 licensed over-the-counter medicine sellers (OTCMS) have emerged throughout Ghana [57].

Survey creation

We first undertook a comprehensive review of the literature, in combination with a series of discussions with stakeholders. Our findings from the review and discussions informed the design of a survey to understand the barriers and facilitators to dispensation of medicines. The survey was piloted at five field sites and revised based on the feedback received. The survey assessed shopkeeper demographics, sales traffic, prices, available brands of antimicrobials, common symptoms observed, and characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood (Appendix S1 File). The present paper relies primarily on responses to qualitative and open-ended questions, with a particular focus on the final question of the survey: “What is the biggest challenge you face as a medicine seller?”

Definition of study sample

Data was collected in community pharmacies and medicine shops based on a number of criteria, namely the sale of antimalarial or antibiotic medications and the presence of an employee able to participate in the survey. We intentionally curated a diverse set of neighborhoods, in various regions of the city and with a variety of distances from hospitals. Any individual shops we came across in these neighborhoods were invited to participate. Our sampling did not intend to saturate any given neighborhood, but Nima and Maamobi contributed a proportionally higher number of shops. These neighborhoods have been described as low-income and disorganized, so we felt it valuable to oversample these neighborhoods which would otherwise be neglected from the canon of research, to include as much data for the analysis as possible. Shopkeepers were invited to participate by explaining the purpose of the project, providing the informed consent paperwork, and offering a printed copy of the survey to aid in deciding whether to participate.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Any employee over the age of 18 who sold antibiotic and/or antimalarial medications in an herbal shop, chemical shop, or pharmacy in the Greater Accra region was eligible for participation in English or Twi.

89 shops were visited, and 94% (n=83) agreed to take part in the study. Of the respondents who offered to participate, 80 met the inclusion criteria and completed the survey in full. Forty-five of the participating field sites were pharmacies, 32 were chemical shops, and three were herbal shops.

Ethical considerations

The study was approved by the New York University Abu Dhabi Institutional Review Board (HRPP-2021-146). A detailed consent form was distributed to participants after introducing the project verbally. Shopkeepers were invited to decline to answer any questions and withdraw at any time. Some surveys were administered on paper, others on a laptop using Qualtrics. The Qualtrics questionnaire automatically skipped questions about antibiotics for chemical shops to investigate only the over-the-counter medicines they were licensed to sell. No identifying information of shops or of participants were recorded, and location data was noted only at the neighborhood level. For confidentiality purposes, surveys were conducted in a location directed by the participant. Surveys were administered verbally and simultaneously typed on a laptop or written on printed copies and later transcribed. Participants were compensated 1.00 Ghanaian cedi per minute that the survey required (USD10.00 per hour).

Conceptual framework

Shopkeepers’ roles in providing community care, through dispensation of medicine, were contextualized via the socioecological model of public health. This model, first delineated by McLeroy and colleagues in 1988, categorizes health-influencing components at the individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and public policy levels [58]. The model posits that examining these factors and how they interact and overlap, can be essential for developing interventions and strategies to improve health and wellbeing. Individual characteristics could include beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors influenced by personal background. Interpersonal factors on the other hand are defined as the relationship between main stakeholders (in this case distributors and customer-patients). The community level includes neighborhood conditions, focusing on the relationships among organizations and groups within it. Organizational characteristics include the structuring of institutions within the healthcare system, and public policy encompasses the broader political and economic changes affecting community pharmacy. We examine the various elements of the model to identify barriers, and determine the contributions of these factors to the challenges.

Responses to the question “What is the biggest challenge you face as a medicine seller?” were compiled for all 80 participants. Responses were coded by one reviewer using a qualitative content analysis method, and 20% were independently coded by a second reviewer. The extent of agreement between coders was k= 0.95. Each response category was then correlated to one or more of the five tiers of the socioecological model of public health, with the number of responses in each category and each tier of the socioecological model tabulated. All responses which alluded to challenges and barriers were compiled in a list. A snowball method was used to select additional qualitative survey questions for analysis; if the response given by participants describing their largest challenge was related to a separate question, all relevant responses to the additional question(s) were considered for inclusion in the analysis. We also present demographic characteristics of respondents, which were analyzed using Stata.

Individual

Shopkeepers referenced a range of distinct personal backgrounds, education routes, beliefs about community health, work characteristics, and sources for acquiring further knowledge. Not all categories were necessarily identified as challenges, in contrast with prior studies. Categories which were theorized in prior research but unreported by participants in the present study appear in Fig 1 as (n=0). Respondents’ degree of enthusiasm for their occupation and its challenges varied.

Among the employment-related challenges cited by respondents were their insufficient income (specifically listed as the biggest challenge by one), a language barrier with customers (n=7), boredom (n=1), and not “having enough time to counsel each patient” (n=1).

Most shops sold a variety of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) antimalarials, and pharmacies in particular tended to sell a variety of both imported and local brands of antibiotics. Shopkeepers reported an absence of centralized guidance about which of these brands were in fact most effective, though some reported feedback from returning customers. Many shopkeepers had thus developed individual opinions about each brand through feedback about patients’ experiences; some shopkeepers voiced a stronger belief in the efficacy of imported or originator brands than local generic brands, with one saying “you can never compare generics to innovator, [imported originator brands being] more efficacious.” These opinions were based on limited patient feedback, rather than centralized system-wide data, potentially impeding prudent distribution.

Shopkeepers’ degree of concern with antimicrobial resistance varied widely, but many noted a strong belief that antimicrobials had to be sold in full and completed as entire treatment courses, guarded for only the cases they deemed necessary. However, they reported a general uncertainty about the issue and a lack of clarity on the state of antimicrobial resistance in Ghana. To overcome this lack of centralized guidance, one pharmacist reported independently reading scientific articles to remain informed about current best practices, and others reported doing research on the internet. Informants explained that AMR was not specifically considered before distributing medications, and some seemed to worry about the rapid emergence of drug resistance rendering their products obsolete, without centralized guidance on which drugs should be still used.

Interpersonal

Interpersonal challenges included the attitudes and concerns of customers and their efforts to self-medicate.

When asked about the greatest challenge they faced, many shopkeepers complained of customers who were rude, made insults, or initiated arguments. Some respondents referenced their need for a great deal of patience, and the proverb “the customer is always right” was mentioned repeatedly, sometimes with chagrin.

The heightened emotions associated with illness were reported to exacerbate shopkeepers’ challenges, as articulated by one: “People walk in with anger. When sick, people become frustrated. They ask for a certain drug… Some may insult or say mean things… I try to advise, but they don’t want to be told what he/she should consume.” Many shopkeepers reported customers resisting their inquiries into symptoms or dismissing their advice. Regarding their stewardship of antibiotics, one reported “Some patients don’t understand antibiotics for instance. [Customers say] ‘ I am buying, [I] don’t understand why you don’t want to sell it to me.’ Sometimes it turns into an argument.” Shopkeepers reported being caught between meeting patients’ demands and retaining commercial viability, while also denying sales to safeguard medications they deem inappropriate. Many cited difficulties along the lines of “trying to get them to understand why they don’t need an antibiotic for a very trivial issue” while occupying a role as health educators in a status position that is typically seen as lower than doctors.

The practice of self-diagnosis was reported to be widespread, whereby customers subverted the process of going to hospitals or clinics and instead identified an illness themselves based on the symptoms they perceived relevant. Efforts to self-medicate with over-the-counter medications often brought customers to pharmacies or chemical shops. When customers believed they needed prescription medications such as antibiotics, shopkeepers reported difficulties: “customers tell ‘ I want this’ but this medicine will not solve their problem. Sometimes they will not understand why, but I say no [to their request] if I know it won’t help them.” Shopkeepers alluded to their conditional allowance of customer self-medication, perhaps offering medications without prescription if they deemed the chosen treatment course useful to the customer. To protect subjects’ confidentiality, we did not ask explicitly about illegal antibiotic distribution. Thus, inferences were made and extrapolated from available responses such as over-the-counter antimalarials.

When shopkeepers tried to explain to customers that a requested medication was not prudent or instead offered an available brand with the same active ingredient, some customers were reportedly staunch in preferring one particular variety.

Some shopkeepers mentioned the potential for drug abuse; one believed that it occurs “especially [for] antibiotic and analgesic” medications, and another explained that they responded to such situations by dodging the customer’s request: “If I think they will abuse it, I tell them it is out of stock.” Though it was unclear what was explicitly interpreted as “abuse”, the context of antimicrobials suggests that abuse could involve either taking an excessive dosage at once, or using medicines for effects other than their prescribed purpose. Future work should elucidate the contextual meaning of “abuse” and its different implications for successful interventions.

Respondents reported that challenges arose when family members who were ill would send children to purchase medication. With conditions of poverty and an inability to miss work, children often served as interlocuters to retrieve medicines. In response, shopkeepers reported that they would send the child away, require a written note from the parent to clarify the correct medication, or call the parent to confirm an over-the-counter medication in case the child misspoke. Shopkeepers reported that dealing with children made providing quality care much more difficult.

80.0% of shopkeepers (n=64) believed that many of their customers lived in the neighborhood surrounding their shop. Some shopkeepers proclaimed a lack of challenges, attributing this to their integration in the surrounding community; several echoed the quote that they “have not faced much challenge due to familiarity.” These shopkeepers may have also experienced the challenges listed by other respondents, but did not perceive them as major challenges worth mentioning. Occupational challenges may have been framed differently in the eyes of long-serving shopkeepers, who considered such obstacles to be ordinary workplace conditions taken for granted.

70% (n=56) of shopkeepers reported that most customers returned to their shop multiple times, while only 7.5% (n=6) reported that most customers visit only one time and do not return. Upon return visits to a given enterprise, some customers reportedly expressed their concerns to shopkeepers. The single most common challenge described by shopkeepers was that of money; 53 respondents (66.3%) alluded to their customers’ payment and the cost of medications as an obstacle. Prices varied by shop, with the overall selection of antimalarials ranging from $0.50 for local varieties to $7.00 for an imported brand. These costs were reported to strain financial resources and be prohibitively high for some customers.

Most shops explicitly specified that they required payment immediately at the time of sale; eight reported as their biggest challenge “customers trying to buy on credit.” The practice of credit occurred only occasionally, dependent on the individual shopkeeper. Some reported that they would offer medicines on credit and trust that a person would return to pay later. This was more common for those who reported being familiar acquaintances with repeat customers. One reported that for patients who were “struggling and can’t pay, I give and pay the rest out of my own funding.”

Some shops reported a lack of diagnostic testing altogether, and others explained that rapid diagnostic testing for malaria was only available for those who “had extra money” for the out-of-pocket fee of diagnostic testing. They suggested that most customers did not opt for the extra cost and instead pursued treatment for presumptive malaria based on symptoms. Some shops reportedly required a rapid diagnostic test result before they distributed antimalarials. One reported that they previously operated on presumptive positive treatment based only on symptoms, but after beginning to offer rapid diagnostic testing, the number of antimalarial medications they sold plummeted. This suggested that they were previously over-distributing antimalarials for cases that were not actually malaria.

Side effects were not mentioned often in customer complaints, but one shopkeeper reported “[I] don’t do malaria tests because injections are not liked,” indicating that customers’ disdain for blood sampling led to the blind treatment of malaria based on symptoms rather than diagnostic testing. Regarding customer concerns about side effects of medications, another respondent explained “only one out of ten of them has complained,” and another said “For other medicines, people complain about side effects, not really [for] antibiotics.”

The availability of dosage strengths and treatment options were described as challenges for some shopkeepers. Medications that required frequent dosages (such as every four hours, or tablets with small dosages that required taking up to four pills at each interval) were reportedly disliked by customers. Some customers would decline to purchase these medications in the first place, and shopkeepers expressed concern that patients who did purchase these typically lower-cost medicines likely would not adhere to their regimens.

Shopkeepers reported that many customers established preferences for particular medications based on prior experiences, advertisements, or reports from acquaintances about which medicines effectively cured their ailments. Many shopkeepers reported with consternation that television and billboard advertising determined which brands customers preferred, with one shopkeeper stating that their biggest challenges was “trying to convince a patient to buy another type of drug aside from what he or she thinks is good or what a layperson or TV/radio advert[advertisement] has explained.”

Organizational

Regulations and structures governing the provision of healthcare may have generated challenges in human resources, patient monitoring, and supply chain management. Economic competition, responses to the Covid-19 pandemic, and the proximity of shops to other medical institutions were reported to have reduced sales for many shops.

Within each shop, particularly in larger enterprises, some respondents described a hierarchy of employees’ roles shaping the provision of medications. As reported by participants, the pharmaceutical sector in Ghana is regulated by a tiered system of employee titles and prescription requirements. Under pharmaceutical regulations, licensed pharmacists can distribute restricted classes of medicines (including some antibiotics) at their own discretion when patients do not have prescriptions. On the other hand, Medicine Counter Assistants, who complete six months of training, do not have this level of agency and are only supposed to recommend over-the-counter medicines or distribute based on existing prescriptions [40, 59]. MCAs may defer to pharmacists when navigating customer demands for higher-tier medications, but the pharmacist may be present only for part of the day, reportedly often the evening shift. Facing an unmet need of licensed pharmacists, other employees may take on pharmacist-specific tasks despite having limited training. Some MCAs explained that they told patients to wait and return to the shop later in the day when seeking medications that could be prescribed by a licensed pharmacist, but it was implied that they may sometimes distribute antibiotics at their own discretion. The disparity between licensed roles and actual practice was thus mentioned as a challenge by some respondents.

Shopkeepers mentioned the absence of a system for following up with patients and monitoring their compliance with treatment courses, particularly for antibiotics. Some respondents believed that patients likely did adhere to their treatment because “it is expensive, no one wants to waste money,” while others were less certain: “might or might not; we are not able to track over time.” The majority echoed this sentiment, and expected that customers would not complete their treatment courses, with only 41% of shopkeepers believing their customers “probably” or “definitely” did adhere to their entire antimicrobial treatment courses. Adherence monitoring was described as being undertaken at an individual level. When asked “Do you think customers actually finish the entire treatment course of antibiotics after they leave the shop?” one responded “Definitely yes, because I talk to them. I tell them when you don’t finish up with the course, your treatment will not wash off [the infection].” Another reported that they took phone numbers and routinely called patients to verbally ensure that they finished their antibiotic course.

Some shopkeepers reported the competition of “too many pharmacies” as their greatest challenge. Price comparisons sought by customers were reported to favor larger chain enterprises rather than smaller shops. Many franchised retail pharmacies also functioned as wholesale suppliers, even manufacturing their own ACT antimalarials through an affiliated factory. A respondent explained that wholesale suppliers calculate costs based on the number of medicines purchased, so shops “taking just five packs of Lufart” (a locally-manufactured brand of antimalarial), for example, would pay more per unit than chain enterprises purchasing large quantities.

45 shops reported no delay between running out of a medication and resupplying, and a further 30 reported that medicines could be restocked within a matter of days. Still, shopkeepers reported some challenges with the supply of certain brands patients preferred and with quality assurance. For instance, several respondents complained that medicines would arrive at or close to their expiry date, and with low sales traffic would expire before they could be sold. Reports of shopkeepers’ greatest challenges included “low sales” and the “expiry of drugs; when drugs arrive they are almost expired and don’t move fast.”

Many shopkeepers reported that the Covid-19 pandemic reduced their sales and customer traffic. Respondents theorized that, fearing both a potentially infectious environment and the social and economic repercussions of a positive Covid diagnosis, many would-be customers avoided sites they associated with sickness. Asked of broader annual fluctuations in customers, a pharmacy shopkeeper replied “Sales are low.

Malaria symptoms are just like Covid symptoms. If [they] have malaria, just similar to Covid— cough, sneeze, feverish, just the symptoms of Covid. It’s difficult because of this Covid. It interrupted a lot of pharmacies because [would-be customers are] afraid to come for drugs.”

Community

Broader challenges faced in the community were reported to intersect with a lack of awareness about medications and a lack of proximity or access to other healthcare services.

A lack of customer/patient awareness of antimicrobial stewardship was described by some shopkeepers, which they often attributed to low education or literacy. Even when customers had awareness of proper use, they may have lacked access to other healthcare services because of prohibitive costs or geographic distance from relevant medicine.

Shops’ proximity and patients’ differing access to hospitals and clinics were reported to heavily influence customer traffic and behaviors. A pharmacy within a hospital reported that patients often chose to take their prescription notes and buy medicines elsewhere for lower prices. Many shops were observed to cluster around hospitals, and a price-comparison practice was reported, in which customers started at the pharmacy closest to the hospital, inquired about prices, and moved down the line to adjacent pharmacies until they found the lowest price. Customers’ purchasing decisions thus appeared to be made based on price above any other factors.

One shopkeeper reported as their primary challenge the insufficient “availability and accessibility of diagnostic tests and diagnostic facilities for customers or patients.” Conversely, some shops reported that they did not offer diagnostic testing for malaria because they could be accessed at the hospital nearby. Shops in neighborhoods surrounding hospitals reportedly relied more heavily on prescriptions than on symptom-based requests from walk-in patients. Proximity to a hospital was reported to affect the reliance on prescriptions and customers’ ability to afford medicines. Shops near hospitals faced less difficulty with customer finances and relied on prescriptions more, because their patients were more likely to have undergone diagnostic testing.

The ability to access hospitals was reported to sometimes predict customers’ medication purchases. Three shopkeepers asserted that visiting a hospital or doctor was an established indicator of affluence. When asked “What would you do if a person doesn’t have enough money for the antimalarial/antibiotic they intended to buy?” a shopkeeper working in close proximity to a hospital responded “Usually they have the money because they’ve been to the hospital. Pharmacy is the first point of contact in the community. If you can [afford to] take a cab to a hospital or clinic, you can afford it [the medication].” This suggests that medicine shop customers without prescriptions were seen as less affluent customers, lacking the financial resources to confer the ability to access doctors or purchase medications easily. Articulating the disparity in access to medicine, one respondent categorized the residents of their surrounding neighborhood as “elite” and said that their clients preferred calling a doctor rather than relying directly on a pharmacist. A higher baseline of wealth reportedly enabled access to doctors in formal institutions of care, while lower-income customers had only sporadic access to care and may have been seen as less reliable customers.

Medicine shops reported encountering fluctuations in sales based on broader economic and political changes. The high rate of informal employment in Accra was reported to create financial variability within customers, potentially undermining the stability of medicine shops and their ability to regularly procure medications. Medication purchasing appeared to be characterized by economic instability: when asked to rank the income level of residents of the surrounding neighborhood (low, medium, or high), answers varied within neighborhoods and one shopkeeper answered “sometimes low, sometimes high.”

Public Policy

Reported challenges with potential policy implications included diagnostic capacity, prices, supply management, and drug quality assurance. However, direct government involvement was not proposed or mentioned by participants, many of whom echoed a general disillusionment with policymaking and an absence of expecting government support or action on the concerns they face.

(I) Challenges to a role as health educators for the community and gatekeepers of medicines

Though Medicine Counter Assistants and pharmacists were not fully sanctioned as healthcare providers, many reported feeling the need to fill a void created by the difficulties that patients face in trying to visit hospitals. This reaffirmed prior literature citing frequent self-medication through private medical shops in Ghana and beyond [37, 41, 61–64].

Shopkeepers’ individual challenges, such as insufficient income, may play into their enthusiasm for the job and the capacity of care they are able to provide. With over 50% of shopkeepers employed less than two years in their present workplace, there appear to be high rates of employee turnover. Individual-level factors may affect the likelihood of long-term career attrition. Especially influential for community health, long-serving shopkeepers may become embedded in the community as trusted health providers, recognizing patterns to establish best practices in care. Conversely, they may retain outdated conceptions of medical practices. In the context of AMR, the rapidly evolving situation requires frequently reevaluating which medicines are to be avoided; if resistance develops like it has for penicillin and chloroquine, it is unclear whether prescribers are given updated information or continue distributing the medications originally encouraged decades prior.

(II) bEconomic ecosystem and cost as the most significant barrier

In their efforts to maintain competitive prices, shopkeepers cited challenges in supply, procurement capacity, prices, and factors disrupting the larger economic ecosystem, such as competition and the Covid-19 pandemic.

(III) Treatment-based challenges

Shopkeepers consistently mentioned two main organizational-level challenges limiting the effectiveness of the treatment that they provide: patient nonadherence to medications, and the supply of efficacious medicines. Although these were not often voiced as the single largest challenge faced, these obstacles could have particularly profound impacts driving the risk of antimicrobial resistance.

Limitations

Social desirability bias and the potential legal ramifications of responses may have led participants to give idealized responses to be compliant with expected standards.

Additionally, responses may have been affected by the positionality of the researchers. The identity of each researcher, one a white U.S. American and the other from Northern Ghana, may have skewed the level of trust which was cultivated and participants’ openness to answering. The participation rate was almost identical for each field researcher, but there may have been differences in communication and distinct types of desirability bias. While this study sought to be as self-reflexive as possible, social dynamics, problematic histories of white researchers, and axes of privilege may have shaped responses and our subsequent interpretations. This study recognizes that responses may have been biased by these dynamics, and results should be interpreted in that lens. Any extrapolation of these findings is limited by its status as research operating at a distance from the experiences of those directly affected. These findings are offered as only one possible interpretation of complex dynamics, cultivated through a research setting rather than firsthand lived experiences.

The subjective nature of some survey questions may have skewed responses, particularly if they morphed slightly or were interpreted differently by respondents. The questionnaire was designed to build upon and corroborate answers to interrelated questions, but the potential for misinterpretation and mistranscription remains. Some responses may have been more anecdotal than representative if recent experiences determined what was most salient to shopkeepers and prone to be reported. Shopkeepers’ beliefs about consumers’ behaviors after purchasing medications and leaving their shop may be inaccurate.

Research in this context builds on an extensive history of problematic practices, and this presence as a white researcher may perpetuate colonial hierarchies. No analysis would be complete without contextualizing the lack of healthcare accessibility in Ghana today at its historical, colonially-driven source, and this study should be interpreted in this larger context. If shopkeepers are ill-informed or face challenges because their healthcare system is fragmented, it may not necessarily be the fault of individual shopkeepers or the healthcare system itself, but rather the colonially broken foundations and conditions imposed by international systems [37].

Future directions

Replicating the present survey in a variety of contexts can improve broader global understanding of antimicrobial distribution. Within Accra, surveying more chemical shops and pharmacies across a wider range of neighborhoods, supplemented with longer-term observational studies, could help validate the quantitative findings of this limited sample size. Laboratory testing to determine the efficacy and quality of the ingredients in available medications would offer essential insights into how supply chains and medicines are performing.

Pinpointing the context-specific drivers of antimicrobial misuse can help allocate resources to target specific practices shown to accelerate drug resistance. Antimicrobials are critically important life-saving medications, but because of heavy reliance and the lack of new innovation, medicine has been losing the race to microbes evolving resistance. To promote stewardship, it is essential to fully understand the challenges plaguing grassroots distributors of antimicrobial medications. The capacity-building of community medicine distributors has been relatively neglected and should be studied further. For contexts struggling with neglected tropical diseases that can be treated with straightforward regimens, existing community health distributors may be valuable stakeholders with extensive potential to improve community health. Expanding safe diagnostic capacities to these informal community health providers should be investigated for viability as a measure to alleviate the burden on crowded hospitals, improve treatment outcomes of the general population, and better inform the prudent use of antimicrobial medications.

With high percentages of customers expected to live in the neighborhood surrounding each shop, shopkeepers may provide a substantiated glimpse into the public health situation at the community level. Broader challenges faced in the surrounding community, such as limited healthcare access and prohibitive costs of formal healthcare institutions, directly shape the experiences of these medicine enterprises (as similarly discussed by Buor and colleagues [88]. Shopkeepers’ reports suggested that they are intrinsically embedded in the communities they serve on a daily basis, thus establishing rapport, hearing concerns, and learning of treatment outcomes. Confirmatory studies should examine long-serving medical shopkeepers’ knowledge of recurring trends in symptoms and treatment patterns to determine how and whether they may wish to be mobilized as key informants of epidemiological surveillance (as in the ABACUS project by Wertheim and colleagues [89]).