ABSTRACT
Introduction The utilization of high fidelity simulations across medical school campuses has grown in recent years as simulation is a useful tool in allowing students to practice real life scenarios in a safe space, as well as providing exposure to rarer cases in medicine. This study evaluated second and third-year medical students’ recognition and management of a postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) due to a retained placenta in SimMom®. The objective was to describe the methods and procedures used in PPH simulation to educate these students across two geographically separated medical school campuses. It became apparent that there is a need to standardize medical simulation to maintain the quality of medical education.
Methods A case-scenario simulation with retained tissue had a run-time of 10 minutes. Times were marked when students identified the retained placental tissue was the cause of hemorrhage and when students extracted the fragment. A debrief with faculty followed the scenario regarding performance and education about the “4 T’s”of post-partum hemorrhage differential diagnosis (Tone, Trauma, Tissue, Thrombin), and the students’ feelings towards the simulation were evaluated with a post simulation survey.
Results Despite efforts to maintain consistent simulations between the two campuses, there was a significant difference of timing between the two campuses to successful completion of the simulation, as well as in the number of students that did not successfully complete the goals of the simulation. However, the post-simulation survey did show that students on both campuses found value in participating in the simulation.
Discussion The performance across the two campuses was statistically different, which illustrates a need to standardize simulation education experiences across medical school campuses. However, this protocol was an effective way to educate students and allow students to have hands-on experience in diagnosing and treating a rare but deadly complication of childbirth. This initial study may facilitate expansion on this particular, topic, as well as suggest more simulation education delivery within the medical school curriculum.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Rocky Vista University, Institutional Review Board
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
First author changed her legal name, the revision only addresses that.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
