Abstract
Background Dominantly inherited GAA repeat expansions in FGF14 are a common cause of spinocerebellar ataxia (GAA-FGF14 ataxia; SCA27B, late-onset). Molecular confirmation of FGF14 GAA repeat expansions has thus far mostly relied on long-read sequencing, a technology that is not yet widely available in clinical laboratories.
Methods We developed and validated a strategy to detect FGF14 GAA repeat expansions using long-range PCR, bidirectional repeat-primed PCRs, and Sanger sequencing. We compared this strategy to targeted nanopore sequencing in a cohort of 22 French Canadian patients and next validated it in a cohort of 53 French index patients with unsolved ataxia.
Results Diagnosis was accurately confirmed for all 22 French Canadian patients using this strategy. Method comparison showed that capillary electrophoresis of long-range PCR products significantly underestimated expansion sizes compared to nanopore sequencing (slope, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81 to 0.93]; intercept, 14.58 [95% CI, -2.48 to 31.12]) and gel electrophoresis (slope, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.97]; intercept, 21.34 [95% CI, -27.66 to 40.22]). The latter techniques yielded similar size estimates. Following calibration with internal controls, expansion size estimates were similar between capillary electrophoresis and nanopore sequencing (slope: 0.98 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.04]; intercept: 10.62 [95% CI, -7.49 to 27.71]), and gel electrophoresis (slope: 0.94 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.09]; intercept: 18.81 [95% CI, -41.93 to 39.15]). We identified 9 French patients (9/53; 17%) and 2 of their relatives who carried an FGF14 (GAA)≥250 expansion.
Conclusion This novel strategy reliably detected and sized FGF14 GAA expansions. It compared favorably to long-read sequencing and can readily be implemented in clinical laboratories.
Competing Interest Statement
Matthis Synofzik has received consultancy honoraria from Janssen, Ionis, Orphazyme, Servier, Reata, GenOrph, and AviadoBio, all unrelated to the present manuscript. Stephan Zuchner is consultant on drug targets for Aeglea BioTherapeutics and consultant on clinical trial design for Applied Therapeutics, all of them unrelated to the work in the present manuscript. Other authors have no relevant financial interests to disclose.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Fondation Groupe Monaco and the Montreal General Hospital Foundation (grant PT79418). The funders had no role in the conduct of this study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The institutional review board of the McGill University Health Centre (MPE-CUSM-15-915) and of the Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Nancy (2020PI220) gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data analyzed in this study can be accessed upon reasonable request to the corresponding authors.
