Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Costs and cost-effectiveness of nurse staffing in acute hospital: a systematic review

View ORCID ProfilePeter Griffiths, View ORCID ProfileChristina Saville, View ORCID ProfileJane Ball, View ORCID ProfileChiara Dall’Ora, View ORCID ProfilePaul Meredith, View ORCID ProfileLesley Turner, View ORCID ProfileJeremy Jones
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.03.23285139
Peter Griffiths
1Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
2Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
3School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peter Griffiths
  • For correspondence: peter.griffiths{at}soton.ac.uk
Christina Saville
1Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
3School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christina Saville
Jane Ball
1Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
3School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jane Ball
Chiara Dall’Ora
1Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
3School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chiara Dall’Ora
Paul Meredith
1Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
2Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Paul Meredith
Lesley Turner
1Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
3School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lesley Turner
Jeremy Jones
3School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jeremy Jones
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Extensive research shows associations between increased nurse staffing, skill mix and patient outcomes. However, showing that improved staffing levels are linked to improved outcomes is not sufficient to provide a case for increasing them. This review of economic studies in acute hospitals aims to identify costs and consequences associated with different nurse staffing configurations in hospitals.

Methods We included economic studies exploring the effect of variation in nurse staffing. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Embase Econlit, Cochrane library, DARE, NHS EED and the INAHTA website. Risk of bias was assessed using a framework based on the NICE guidance for public health reviews and Henrikson’s framework for economic evaluations. Inclusion, data extraction and critical appraisal were undertaken by pairs of reviewers with disagreements resolved by a third. Results were synthesised using a hierarchical matrix to summarise findings of economic evaluations

Results We found 22 observational studies conducted in the USA (15), Australia, Belgium, China, South Korea and the United Kingdom (3). Fourteen had high risk of bias and eight moderate. Six studies clearly favoured increased registered nurse staffing with improved outcomes and reduced or unchanged net costs, but most showed increased costs and outcomes. Studies undertaken outside the USA showed that increased nurse staffing was likely to be cost-effective at a per capita GDP threshold or lower. Three studies of skill mix favoured increased registered nurse skill mix, with reduced net cost and similar or improved outcomes.

Discussion Despite the risk of bias, evidence is largely consistent and strongly favours increased skill mix. Evidence for the cost-effectiveness of increases in registered nurse staffing is less certain although it is likely to be cost-effective. In an era of registered nurse scarcity, the results strongly favour investment in registered nurse supply as opposed to using lesser qualified staff as substitutes.

What is already known?

  • Higher registered nurse staffing levels and skill mix in acute hospitals are associated with improved care quality and patient outcomes, most notably reduced risk of death

  • Previous reviews of evidence strongly support a causal interpretation, but reviews of economic evidence have failed to reach firm conclusions.

What is study adds

  • Despite limitations in the evidence, results favour a richer registered nurse skill mix in the nursing workforce as an economically dominant strategy and increases in registered nurse staffing could be cost effective at a low threshold

How this study might affect research practice or policy

  • Workforce substitution is unlikely to provide a cost-effective solution to registered nurse shortages.

  • More incremental cost effectiveness studies are required to guide decision making in context as specific results do not generalise

CREDiT (author contributions) Jane Ball, Chiara Dall’Ora, Peter Griffiths, Jeremy Jones, Paul Meredith acquired funding for the study Peter Griffiths, Jeremy Jones, Christina Saville designed the review and wrote the protocol

Christina Saville undertook the searches

Jane Ball, Jeremy Jones, Paul Meredith, Lesley Turner, Christina Saville undertook screening and application of the inclusion criteria

Jane Ball, Chiara Dall’Ora, Peter Griffiths, Jeremy Jones, Paul Meredith, Lesley Turner, Christina Saville undertook data extraction and critical appraisal of included studies

Christina Saville and Peter Griffiths prepared the first draft of the paper

Peter Griffiths undertook data synthesis and drafted results

Jane Ball, Chiara Dall’Ora, Peter Griffiths, Jeremy Jones, Paul Meredith, Lesley Turner, Christina Saville reviewed the first draft and provided critical comment and contribution to the discussion / suggested revisions.

All reviewed the final draft

Registration PROSPERO (CRD42021281202).

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Protocols

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021281202

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the NIHR [Health and Social Care Delivery Research (award NIHR128056)] and the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Wessex.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • (peter.griffiths{at}soton.ac.uk)

  • (C.E.Saville{at}soton.ac.uk)

  • (jane.ball{at}soton.ac.uk)

  • (C.Dallora{at}soton.ac.uk)

  • (p.f.meredith{at}soton.ac.uk)

  • (L.Y.Turner{at}soton.ac.uk)

  • (jeremy.jones{at}soton.ac.uk)

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 03, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Costs and cost-effectiveness of nurse staffing in acute hospital: a systematic review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Costs and cost-effectiveness of nurse staffing in acute hospital: a systematic review
Peter Griffiths, Christina Saville, Jane Ball, Chiara Dall’Ora, Paul Meredith, Lesley Turner, Jeremy Jones
medRxiv 2023.02.03.23285139; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.03.23285139
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Costs and cost-effectiveness of nurse staffing in acute hospital: a systematic review
Peter Griffiths, Christina Saville, Jane Ball, Chiara Dall’Ora, Paul Meredith, Lesley Turner, Jeremy Jones
medRxiv 2023.02.03.23285139; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.03.23285139

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Economics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)