Abstract
Background A promising treatment option for adolescents with treatment-resistant depression is high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC). Conventional coil placement strategies for rTMS in adults include the 5-cm rule, the Beam F3 method, and the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) neuronavigation method. The purpose of this study was to compare the three targeting approaches to a computational E-field optimization coil placement method in depressed adolescents.
Methods Ten consenting and assenting depressed adolescents (4 females, age: 15.9 ± 1.1) participated in an open-label rTMS treatment study. Participants were offered MRI-guided rTMS 5 times per week over 6–8 weeks. To compute the induced E-field, a head model was generated based on MRI images, and a figure-8 TMS coil (Neuronetics) was placed over the L-DLPFC using the four targeting approaches.
Results Results show that there was a significant difference in the induced E-field at the L-DLPFC between the four targeting methods (χ2 = 24.7, p < 0.001). Post hoc pairwise comparisons show that there was a significant difference between any two of the targeting methods (Holm adjusted p < 0.05), with the 5-cm rule producing the weakest E-field (46.0 ± 17.4 V/m), followed by the F3 method (87.4 ± 35.4 V/m), followed by the MRI-guided (112.1 ± 14.6 V/m), and followed by the computationally optimized method (130.1 ± 18.1 V/m). The Bartlett test of homogeneity of variances show that there was a significant difference in sample variance between the groups (K2 = 8.0, p < 0.05), with F3 having the largest variance. In participants who completed the full course of treatment, the median E-field strength in the L-DLPFC was correlated with the change in depression severity (r = –0.77, p < 0.05).
Conclusions The E-field models revealed inadequacies of scalp-based targeting methods compared to MRI-guidance. Computational optimization may further enhance E-field dose delivery to the treatment target.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT01502033
Funding Statement
Z.-D. Deng, P. Robins, and M. Dannhauer are supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Intramural Research Program (ZIAMH002955). P. Croarkin is supported by the NIMH R01MH113700 grant: Glutamatergic and GABAergic Biomarkers in TMS for Adolescent Depression. The study was also supported by the O'Shaughnessy (Woolls') Foundation. Neuronetics provided equipment support and Senstar shields through an investigator-initiated trial program to Dr. Croarkin.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This open-label rTMS study was conducted under an Investigational Device Exemption (#G110091) from the United States Food and Drug Administration and approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
E-mail: zhi-de.deng{at}nih.gov
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
