Abstract
Background Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) is a non-atherosclerotic arteriopathy associated with stenosis, aneurysm, and dissection. We aimed to characterize racial differences in clinical presentation and diagnosis among patients with FMD at our institution.
Methods We utilized an ambulatory FMD database to review demographics, clinical presentation, and diagnostic assessments of patients diagnosed with FMD within a university-affiliated healthcare system. Patients were classified as White or Non-White based on self-identified race. We evaluated race-specific differences in diagnosis and disease manifestations.
Results A total of 208 patients (White: n=160 (77%); Non-White; n=48 (23%)) were included in the analysis. The time from initial FMD symptom to diagnosis was longer in Non-Whites than Whites (5.5 vs. 1.5 yrs; p<0.001), yet time from diagnosis to Emory specialist center visit was longer in Whites (3.2 vs. 1.2 yrs; p=0.035). Whites were more likely to undergo ≥ 5 multi-imaging diagnostic assessments than Non-Whites (89% vs. 73%; p=0.002). History of hypertension, stroke, & chronic kidney disease were more common in Non-Whites. FMD involvement of the internal carotid artery and upper extremity vessels were more common in Non-Whites, while Whites had more renal artery involvement.
Conclusion We found racial differences in the diagnosis of FMD. The time from symptom onset to diagnosis was longer in Non-White than White FMD patients. Multimodality diagnostic imaging was more often utilized in Whites than Non-Whites. Research is needed to investigate these racial differences.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
NA
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of Emory University gave ethical approval for this work. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained prior to the initiation of the retrospective chart review. Approval was received under expedited review. An expedited review procedure consists of a review of research involving human subjects by the Institutional Review Board chairperson or by one or more experienced reviewers designated by the chairperson from among members of the Institutional Review Board. The project posed minimal risk and therefore fit the expedited review category. No annual review is required by the Institutional Review Board. A complete waiver of HIPAA authorization and informed consent was granted by the Emory University Institutional Review Board.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, AM, upon reasonable request.
