ABSTRACT
Objectives To quantitatively test the quality of randomised controlled trials reported to international scientific meetings through a critical analysis of randomisation outcomes.
Design and Main Outcome Measures All randomised controlled trials presented at international surgical and urological congresses using simple randomisation were identified. Primary analysis of randomisation technique was performed by comparing the observed and expected numbers of trials with equal numbers of participants in each arm. Sensitivity analyses compared study design, type of study and presence of external sponsorship. All abstracts were assessed according to the CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts checklist.
Results 345 studies met the inclusion criteria. 148 studies reported simple randomisation to allocate 26,510 patients. Randomisation technique could not be identified in 104 studies. Primary and all secondary analyses demonstrated a probability of p<0.0001 that simple randomisation was used for participant allocation in all studies. Mean consort score was 9.4
Conclusions It is extremely unlikely that simple randomisation was performed as reported in a significant proportion of the 148 RCTs in this study. These results raise concerning questions of the veracity and reliability of current medical research. There needs to be a greater awareness of the potential for methodological inaccuracy and error.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files
