Abstract
Objectives
To ascertain the referral pattern and the awareness about clinical conditions treated in the Department of Hand Surgery among the triage staff.
To determine if is there a difference between the triaging by the doctors and by the junior (less than 5 years in service) and the senior nurses (more than 5 years in service) with reference to clinical conditions which are treated in the Hand surgery Department.
Materials and methods This was a cross-sectional observational study which was conducted in a tertiary care center in India. The study involved a total of 115 participants with junior nurses, senior nurses and doctors working in the triage service of the hospital.
All participants were shown a semi-structured tool with clinical scenarios which had photographs and clinical information in text, on a computer screen using Microsoft PowerPoint. The clinical scenario was also narrated to them. The referral pattern was noted down and tabulated.
Results It is interesting to note that,
Only in 1 out of the 20 scenarios, hand surgery was the most frequently referred department.
Most of the Bony injuries of the hand and the forearm were mainly referred to orthopaedics.
Burns and raw areas of the forearm were frequently referred to plastic surgery.
Hand deformities were commonly referred to either plastic surgery or orthopaedics.
Nerve injuries were referred to neurology and orthopaedics typically.
Orthopaedics was the most referred department.
The average reference percentage of the junior nurse was 3.91%, senior nurse was 21.9% and doctors was 23.95%. Junior nurses performed exceedingly poor in referring cases to the department of hand surgery as compared to the other two subgroups.
Conclusion This study shows us the drawbacks in our present triaging system emphasizing the need for training our staff on new departments referral pattern, the advancements, and updated protocols.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IEC-NI/21/OCT/80/136. Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research - Institutional ethical Committee approves the project
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Ph : +919791193230, Email : d334102{at}gmail.com
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
