Weather variation in objectively measured physical activity: results of four Brazilian cohorts

Rafaela Costa Martins; Cauane Blumenberg; Andrea T Wendt; Werner de Andrade Müller; Iná S Santos; Alicia Matijasevich; Marlos Domingues; Andréa D Bertoldi; Helen Gonçalves; Fernando C. Wehrmeister; Felipe Fossati Reichert

doi:10.1101/2023.03.02.23285008

ABSTRACT

Background The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship of objectively measured physical activity and weather variables in different stages of life course.

Methods This study used data from four Brazilian cohorts (mean ages: 10.9, 22.6, 30.2, and 70.5 years). The exposure was weather variation, using temperature, rain, humidity, and wind velocity. The outcome measured was accelerometer based physical activity in three ways: overall, 5-minute bouts, and 10-minute bouts physical activity. Both exposure and outcome were collected from the same period. Crude and adjusted analyses were fitted using a two-part model.

Results Among 9,966 individuals from different ages evaluated, physical activity levels were low, especially in older adults. Rain and mean wind velocity were not associated physical activity of individuals, however, the probability of children being inactive was higher during humid days. After mutually adjusting the models for weather variables, only mean temperature and humidity were associated with higher and lower physical activity levels in children, respectively.

Conclusions Weather variables are not key indicators to be accounted when modelling physical activity studies in almost all ages. However, this study helps to identify specifically exposures, regardless of the physical activity operationalization.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The Wellcome Trust supported the 1982 and 2004 birth cohorts: grant numbers are 086974/Z/08/Z and 086974/Z/08/Z, respectively.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the Federal University of Pelotas, affiliated with the Brazilian National Council for Research Ethics (CONEP) of the Ministry of Health, approved all cohort follow-ups (2004 Cohort: 889.753; 1993 Cohort: 1.250.366; 1982 Cohort: 16/2012; COMO VAI? study: 201324538513.1.0000.5317).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes