Abstract
Background It has been taught as a fundamental value that for skin sutures and wound closure, non-absorbable sutures should be used without many research papers supporting its higher efficacy with decreased would infection, decreased wound dehiscence and decreased skin scarring. The optimal suture material type still remains a myth.
Objective This study aimed to compare the outcomes of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure
Methods A Systemic-review was performed with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Cohort studies that compared outcomes of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure.
Results A total of 5096 patients in 27 RCTs analyzed. There was no significant difference between absorbable sutures and non-absorbable sutures in the incidence of wound infections, scar formation and wound dehiscence. The results of both groups are quite comparable with nil heterogeneity.
Conclusions Absorbable sutures for skin closure were not inferior to nonabsorbable sutures. It should be recommended due to its great cost and time savings. Well-designed RCTs with sufficient follow-ups are needed to adequately clarify whether better cosmetic results can be achieved using intradermal absorbable sutures.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Contact no:- +91 9173655551, Email address:- devhdesai01{at}gmail.com
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
