Abstract
Objective Patient involvement is used to describe the inclusion of patients as active participants in healthcare decision-making and research. This study aimed to investigate incoming Year 1 medical (MBChB) students’ attitudes and opinions regarding patient involvement in this context.
Methods We established a staff-student partnership to formulate the design of an online research survey, which included Likert scale questions and three short vignette scenarios designed to probe student attitudes towards patient involvement linked to existing legal precedent. Incoming Year 1 medical students (n = 333) were invited to participate in the survey before formal teaching commenced.
Results Survey data (49 participants) indicate that students were broadly familiar with, and supportive of, patient involvement in medical treatment. There was least support for patient involvement in conducting (22.4%), contributing to (34.7%) or communicating research (30.6%), whereas there was unanimous support for patients choosing treatment from a selection of options (100%).
Conclusion Incoming members of the medical profession demonstrate awareness of the need to actively involve patients in healthcare decision-making but are unfamiliar with the utility and value of such involvement in research. Further empirical studies are required to examine attitudes to patient involvement in healthcare.
Manuscript Revision
This pre-print represents the third version of this manuscript, which has been submitted for peer-review and publication. Further changes are likely to be made before it is published.
Summary of minor changes made to version 2
Changed of title to focus on ‘healthcare’ research and decision-making.
Revised the introduction to focus on patient and public involvement (PPI) over ethical themes.
Changed order of Table 1 and 2 to align with appearance in the text.
Revised the discussion to focus on PPI, removed of specific results/ percentages, removed references to micro/macro healthcare.
Reduced and consolidated the strengths and limitations section.
Edits to general formatting to align with publisher guidelines.
Added/removed references in line with aforementioned changes to the body of the manuscript.
Amended spelling (from US English to UK English) and changed to Vancouver Referencing Style in line with publisher guidelines.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Approval for this study was obtained from the University of Glasgow College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences (MVLS) Ethics Committee for Non-clinical Research Involving Human Participants [No: 200210131] and the informed consent of all participants obtained.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Summary of minor changes made to version 2: Changed of title to focus on healthcare research and decision-making. Revised the introduction to focus on patient and public involvement (PPI) over ethical themes. Changed order of Table 1 and 2 to align with appearance in the text. Revised the discussion to focus on PPI, removed of specific results/ percentages/ removed references to micro/macro healthcare. Reduced and consolidated the strengths and limitations section. Edits to general formatting to align with publisher guidelines. Added/removed references in line with aforementioned changes to the body of the manuscript. Amended spelling (from US English to UK English) and changed to Vancouver Referencing Style in line with publisher guidelines.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
