“Whenever I tell her to wear slippers, she turns a deaf ear. She never listens” : a qualitative descriptive research on the barriers to basic lymphedema management and quality of life in lymphatic filariasis patients in a rural block of eastern India

Symptoms and signs of the disease

Patients had experienced fever, pain, and discomfort in their whole body; pain, burning sensations, and swelling in the lower limbs, including the ankles; red eyes; vomiting; weakness; and complications such as hydrocele. Thus, these multiple symptoms made the patients unable to maintain their health and increased their hardships in life, as quoted by two participants below:

“In a month, fever comes four times. Only on sweating it becomes alright.” (patient, homemaker in her 40s)

“Once fever came. It was so severe that my legs were swelled up, it was even more severe compared to current swelling. And blisters appeared … it was like blisters that appear after burn…. There was severe burning sensation, that I couldn’t sleep due to this.” (patient, Anganwadi worker for 15 years)

All these symptoms not only had a great effect on the quality of life but also portrayed symptoms that caused severe suffering due to ADLA. Their persistence over multiple years had added to the difficulty faced during the disease. Sometimes the disease was resistant to the usual treatment, and this made the condition chronic over the years, as quoted by the patient:

“In 2013, I went to see the doctor (at) hospital… they prescribed an injection from there. I do not remember the name. They gave 12 injections daily at morning and evening. At that time some swelling diminished, but after that gradually swelling appeared (again).” (patient, Anganwadi worker for 15 years)

Seasonal factors

Bihar has a very high temperature of around 40 degrees Celsius during the summer season, a heavy monsoon during the months of June to September, and a harsh winter ranging from November to February. A wide variation in the occurrence of ADLA has been noted, with difficulty mainly occurring during the summer.

“In winter discomfort used to be less, but in summer the discomfort increases. Swelling also increases in summer. The burning sensation in my legs become more severe and sometimes my whole body becomes swollen… in one leg, swelling persists throughout the year but in another leg, swelling occurs only in the summer. During winter season, this leg (showing her leg that swells in summer and currently swollen) becomes normal, but in summer it becomes like this (by showing her other swollen leg).” (patient, Anganwadi worker for 15 years)

There was reporting of a high fever and a flare-up of swelling in the lower limbs in two patients during the winter. The cold weather is unfavorable for the development of microfilariae but favorable for the breeding conditions of the vector mosquito, and vice versa. This results in more injection of microfilariae into the bloodstream and accumulation of the pathogen in the lymphatic system, which may explain the discomfort felt by these patients in our study during the winter.

“(Swelling of leg) creates more problem for him in winter, and less in summer… He doesn’t have any problem doing anything in summer. But if he overexerts himself, then everything swells up.” (caregiver of vegetable seller in her 30s)

Low awareness in patients and relatives

The participants had some basic knowledge about the nature of the disease; however, around half of the respondents did not have awareness about prevention and treatment available in the community, and the health facilities were lacking. One respondent reasoned that she was not formally educated, even though she was an Anganwadi worker.

“Not much information about filaria… Nowadays, social media is there. Like, whenever pain is there, I open YouTube and see, what could be done.” (caregiver, a hospital attendant)

The caregiver was also unaware about how to maintain hygiene of the affected limb of the patient:

“Whenever I tell her to wear slippers, she turns a deaf ear. She never listens… (I know) nothing regarding cleaning her leg.”

Regarding the MDA programme, their low trust in government services had led them to find other options, one of which was buying over-the-counter medicines and self-medicating without a doctor’s prescription. They had been slowly discouraged from taking the MDA supply because of false information about their effectiveness, which has clearly deterred the implementation of the programme.

“I have not been to any doctor. (I have taken) medicines, like, these small tablets, something like that.” (patient, farmer in his 40s)

“No, I didn’t take it. Earlier where I used to live, I had taken the medicines. I remember. I ate once or twice the drug for Filaria. You know, ASHA and ANMs; they only gave the drugs.” (caregiver, a hospital attendant)

“Some people go to medical shops and show their drug there and that shop owner says that the drug is of no use and he gives another drug telling his drug would work better.” (health care worker)

Low adherence

The low adherence was in relation to preventive chemotherapy (MDA). There was a lack of trust in the government’s supply of free MDA drugs. Some revealed straightaway that they did not consume the medicine given to them biannually by healthcare workers. This problem has been shown from a patient’s, a relative’s, and a health care worker’s perspective:

“I was taking another medication, how could I take another? When they gave medicine (MDA), I thought I will take, but the same night I got fever and chills.” (patient, homemaker in her 70s)

“He doesn’t listen (to anyone). He says it (MDA) doesn’t work. Taking only those medicines (from private) work. If it’s for deworming, then he takes (from Government supply).” (caregiver of vegetable seller in her 30s)

“When I meet those people, I ask them whether they took the drug or not… few reply yes while rest say no…most people don’t take it in front of me, and I don’t know what they did with the drug.” (health care worker)

Low health-seeking behaviour in modern medicine

There was an overall low health-seeking behaviour among the patients. It could have been due to self-medication, as mentioned before. It could also be rooted in some barriers to receiving adequate treatment, such as the high cost of private healthcare services. Some patients tried alternative therapy for filarial lymphedema. But they eventually faced failure in getting cured, which has further aggravated their suffering:

“I tried in ayurvedic, allopathy, homeopathy. Everywhere, but it wasn’t successfully treated… no medicines are available. I don’t have such information.” (caregiver, a hospital attendant)

The management of complications such as hydrocele in a patient gave an insight into how these factors can affect their decision to avail healthcare services related to lymphadenitis.

“He never used to go for consultation. I forcefully took him, and they did an ultrasound. He was diagnosed with ripe filaria. Then only we went for surgery, it took around forty to fifty thousand rupees. Then he took 6 months rest. Then only (the treatment) worked.” (caregiver of vegetable seller in her 30s)

Hopelessness from not getting cured

Because of all these barriers affecting the patients’ suffering, they experienced strong feelings of dissatisfaction about never getting cured of filariasis and ADLA. Different modes of therapy had failed in the end to improve the quality of life for some of the patients.

“There was a Homeopathic doctor in the colony. Many people used to say that the treatment is effective, but it didn’t work for me. There was another doctor who used to give some zaributi (plant-based) medicine, he told not take food throughout the day after taking the medicine, and to take curd in the evening. The whole day I had to starve. But nothing happened. Then I became tired of it and left it… the disease was not cured, so how one could be satisfied?” (patient, Anganwadi worker for 15 years)

This could adversely impact their mental well-being, affecting even the caregivers, who had spent a great proportion of their time caring for the disabled individuals. They had witnessed the pain and suffering of their loved ones, which rendered them disgruntled and hopeless about the whole situation.

“See, some disease has no cure, like AIDS. (It’s possible) only if you take precautions. I know this disease (Filariasis) can’t be cured. But treatment must cure the pain. Like, pain occurs as if it may kill you. So, to avoid that, government should do something, to reduce the pain.” (caregiver, a hospital attendant)

Hopelessness led to expectations for better intervention from the government. This situation points to the existing gap between guidelines and the reach of successful ground-level interventions of the MDA-MMDP programme, which had not managed to prevent the occurrence of filariasis in the community.

Not maintaining personal hygiene

Some patients in the community were not using soap to clean the affected limbs, even though a water supply was present in their household. Instead, they were using ashes to care for the infected leg. Another necessity was taking adequate rest. But most of them were either involved in doing work without any break or not fulfilling the basic requirements of foot care, skin care, exercise, and leg elevation.

“It becomes very difficult to do farming in the cold… I go without (slippers).” (patient, farmer in his 40s)

“This thing, I always tell her. That whenever you sit, wherever you sit, always have your legs raised up… She never listens.” (caregiver, a hospital attendant)

Maintaining hygiene is the most important need for ADLA patients who are suffering for prolonged periods of time. This aspect had been very much neglected by most of the respondents, which continued to add to the healthcare costs and burden of filariasis in the community.

Hampered activities of daily living

Patients reported difficulty in maintaining balance, walking, standing up or sitting down, or doing the basic household chores like cooking, washing, or cleaning. The main culprits were pain and swelling of the lower limbs, which hampered the normal movements of the patients. One of the patients expressed her plight in facing severe difficulty in doing chores at home, with no one to help her at all:

“I am not able to do cold related work. What else! …Like, work related with water, have to do it irrespective of other family members at home or not. Even if I worry, what can I do! If there are no daughters or daughter-in-law at home, one has to do it. At least cooking and cleaning have to be done, who will do all these things? No one is here.” (patient, homemaker in her 70s)

Psychosocial difficulty

Few respondents reported that they had decreased socializing in their neighbourhood because of physical difficulty. One respondent informed about financial difficulty with filariasis in the past while his children were still dependent. Though there was no stigma in the study community regarding filariasis and ADLA, some patients seemed to go into recluse or even delve into addiction once they were known to be afflicted with this disease.

A caregiver reported that the patient did not consume MDA given by ASHA and only took medicine from a private facility, even though his whole family took MDA. He also didn’t care for his lymphedema in the lower limb. However, since he had filariasis, the main problem reported was his addiction to alcohol:

“He stays outside, goes to village. Now he goes astray, and then drinks (alcohol). Now when he drinks, only that can bring some relief. This is the main problem, nothing else. If only his alcohol addiction was managed, then there would be no problem.” (caregiver of vegetable seller in her 30s)

Perhaps the consumption of alcohol by this patient reflected a much deeper problem in this setting. The feeling of never getting out of the ‘abyss’ of filariasis can negatively impact the quality of life of whole families, not just the patients.

Lack of capacity building for grassroots workers

The reason healthcare workers are not taking adequate care of patients could be attributed to infrequent training regarding the disease. One grassroots healthcare worker, when asked if she had attended any meeting or training on filariasis, replied that she had attended only one meeting regarding managing filariasis in the community:

“Yes, long time ago, but I don’t remember much about it now… I tell them (patients) to keep wet warm cloth over the limb, but it has not been told how long they should do it.” (health care worker)

Unfortunately, there had been no formal training programme for capacity building of the healthcare workers on the management of filariasis and ADLA in the community. The only time ‘meetings’ were held were on “surveys regarding how many patients are positive” for filariasis.

Lack of receipt of regular incentives for grassroots workers

One of the major problems in managing patients with filariasis was a lack of motivation and disappointment, which stemmed from the fact that healthcare workers were not getting any incentives for taking filariasis patients to health facilities.

“Yes, if we will get something for filariasis obviously we would pay more attention to those patients and will bring them to BPHC.” (health care worker)

“No incentive for taking patient to hospital. We get incentive during program, for house to house, mass drug administration in people starting from more than two year old.” (health care worker)

On the contrary, the block health manager of the same block told a different story:

“Yes, a hundred rupees for bringing patient… yesterday all ASHA who brought patient, they all got hundred rupees. They get incentives for all work.”

Because of the lack of regular incentives for healthcare workers, some patients reported very few visits from the grassroots workers. Even if they mobilized the patients, all they did was give the MMDP kits to the patients at the BPHC every Monday. They did not have any information on how to clean the ADLA-affected limbs to decrease the chances of ADLA attacks.

Unavailability of laboratory diagnosis of filariasis at health facility

Laboratory diagnosis of LF by examination of blood at night is an important follow-up method for detecting any active traces of infection in patients. The investigation by microscopic examination was not available at any nearby health center or even the BPHC, while management of the disease was based mainly on clinical diagnosis. The need for laboratory diagnosis and advice for management of the disease sequelae was very much felt at the village level by the patients and their relatives.

“No such test was there. As you people are saying, there is no treatment for filaria. Doctor said, there’s no any internal problem. So, we didn’t do anything else. They didn’t tell anything as such (about taking care of swollen leg).” (caregiver, a hospital attendant)

Unavailability of management of complications of filariasis at health facility

Treatment of complications was not available at the BPHC. On OPD visits, they were not given advice regarding how to take care of the affected limb at home. Thus, patients had to travel long distances to a tertiary health center to avail of such services, which made even the healthcare workers apprehensive.

“Most people don’t go to block, even at my home there are two patients of filariasis but they don’t go to hospital. It would be better if more facilities for treatment will be provided at the center!” (health care worker)

This was a dangerous precedent for the growing burden of complications in the community. An urgent need was felt to scale up the services and initiate minor surgical and dressing procedures in the peripheral health facilities of the area for care of the affected limbs and complications like ADLA and hydrocele.

Inconsistent drug supply in the community and health facility

The treatment component of filariasis was mostly symptomatic among the respondents. diethylcarbamazine, ivermectin, and albendazole had not been administered to many patients because of their inconsistent availability at the BPHC. A relative remembered that besides not getting tested in a laboratory, the patient also did not receive the main chemotherapeutic management of the disease from a tertiary hospital, which was quite alarming.

“One year back, I sought treatment (for patient). We got only calcium. Nothing else. Calcium and BP.” (caregiver, a hospital attendant)

The block health manager though, recounted differently:

“Filariasis is very common here. Yesterday we distributed kits, as many patients came. Patient presents with fever, cough, swelling of limbs. Even if slight swelling is there, we start DEC 6mg/kg. Suppose 70kg male presents with swelling then dose will be 420mg. So we give 100mg thrice daily with Levocetirizine which prevents drug allergy.”

The healthcare workers took the patients to the BPHC, where they received adequate treatment only when there was a supply of diethylcarbamazine and albendazole. There could be certain areas in the community that had been missed during the MDA implementation too. One patient in the study area complained about not receiving the MDA drugs from the healthcare workers during the biannual deworming days.

No financial assistance

Most of the patients had to buy preventive measures like long-lasting insecticide nets (LLINs) from shops, although they were supposed to receive them from the public distribution system or from the health facility under NVBDCP. But both the healthcare workers and the block health manager corroborated that the BPHC did not receive any supply for the LLINs.

“Mosquito nets they (patients) have to purchase.” (health care worker)

“They do not get LLINs from here. They get from government supply. They just get medicines, bath tub, mug, antifungal, soap and povidone iodine from here.” (block health manager)

This was an added burden for those who could not even afford three meals every day, as the majority of the filariasis patients in the study area belonged to very poor socioeconomic class. Both patients and grassroots workers complained that the afflicted are not benefited by any means by attending the BPHC. Because of the dearth of so many services in government health facilities, some patients were forced to resort to treatment in the private sector.

“We went (to doctor) in 2016 only. Did ultrasound, and then did operation (for hydrocele). Yes it’s private. We take medicines from private. They give medicine of hundred or fifty rupees, only then he becomes fine, otherwise not.” (caregiver of vegetable seller in her 30s)

All these factors contributed to increased out-of-pocket expenditures. Households with patients with LF can incur huge costs, especially if they are in the low-income group or if they are seeking medical care in the private sector instead of a government health facility.