Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Building and validating 5-feature models to predict preeclampsia onset time from electronic health record data

Hailey K Ballard, Xiaotong Yang, Aditya Mahadevan, Dominick J Lemas, Lana X Garmire
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.23.23287655
Hailey K Ballard
1Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
2Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaotong Yang
1Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aditya Mahadevan
4Center for Research in Perinatal Outcomes, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
5Department of Physiology and Aging, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dominick J Lemas
2Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
3Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
4Center for Research in Perinatal Outcomes, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lana X Garmire
1Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lgarmire{at}umich.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Preeclampsia is a potentially fatal complication during pregnancy, characterized by high blood pressure and presence of proteins in the urine. Due to its complexity, prediction of preeclampsia onset is often difficult and inaccurate.

Methods This study aims to create quantitative models to predict the onset gestational age of preeclampsia using electronic health records. We retrospectively collected 1178 preeclamptic pregnancy records from the University of Michigan Health System(UM) as the discovery cohort, and 881 records from the University of Florida Health System(UF) as the validation cohort. We constructed two Cox-proportional hazards models with Lasso regularization: one baseline model utilizing maternal and pregnancy characteristics, and the other full model with additional lab results, vital signs, and medications in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. We built the models using 80% of the UM data and subsequently tested them on the remaining 20% UM data and validated with UF data. We further stratified the patients into high and low risk groups for preeclampsia onset risk assessment.

Findings The baseline model reached C-indices of 0·64 and 0·61 in the 20% UM testing data and the UF validation data, respectively, while the full model increased these C-indices to 0·69 and 0·61 respectively. Both the baseline and full models contain five selective features, among which number of fetuses in the pregnancy, hypertension and parity are shared between the two models with similar hazard ratios. In the baseline model, history of complicated type II diabetes and a mood/anxiety disorder during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy were important. In the full model, maximum diastolic blood pressure in early pregnancy was the predominant feature.

Interpretation Electronic health record data provide useful information to predict gestational age of preeclampsia onset. Stratification of the cohorts using five-predictor Cox-PH models provide clinicians with convenient tools to assess the patients’ onset time of preeclampsia.

Funding This study was supported by grants through the NIEHS, NICHD, NIDDK, and NCATS.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

LXG was supported by grants K01ES025434 awarded by NIEHS through funds provided by the trans-NIH Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K) initiative (www.bd2k.nih.gov), R01 LM012373 and LM012907 awarded by NLM, R01 HD084633 awarded by NICHD. DJL was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K01DK115632) and the University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UL1TR001427). AM is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (5TL1TR001428). Additionally, the research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under the University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Award UL1TR001427.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Institutional Review Board of the University of Michigan Medical School (HUM#00168171) gave ethical approval for this work. The Institutional Review Board of the University of Florida (#201601899) gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Updated author order

Data Availability

Data sharing is restricted. Access can be requested via the IRBs.

Data Availability

Data sharing is restricted. Access can be requested via the IRBs.

  • List of Abbreviations

    (PE)
    Preeclampsia
    (EMRs)
    Electronic medical records
    (C-index)
    Concordance index
    (EOPE)
    Early-onset preeclampsia
    (LOPE)
    Late-onset preeclampsia
    (Cox-PH)
    Cox proportional hazards
    (ICD)
    International Classification of Diseases
    (BMI)
    Body mass index
    (UF)
    University of Florida
    (HR)
    Hazard Ratio
    (PI)
    Prognosis Index
    (WBCC)
    White Blood Cell Count
    (MCHC)
    Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration
    (MPV)
    Mean platelet volume
    (NSAIDs)
    Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted March 27, 2023.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Building and validating 5-feature models to predict preeclampsia onset time from electronic health record data
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Building and validating 5-feature models to predict preeclampsia onset time from electronic health record data
    Hailey K Ballard, Xiaotong Yang, Aditya Mahadevan, Dominick J Lemas, Lana X Garmire
    medRxiv 2023.03.23.23287655; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.23.23287655
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Building and validating 5-feature models to predict preeclampsia onset time from electronic health record data
    Hailey K Ballard, Xiaotong Yang, Aditya Mahadevan, Dominick J Lemas, Lana X Garmire
    medRxiv 2023.03.23.23287655; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.23.23287655

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Health Informatics
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)