A New Vaccination Assessment Method and Strategy for COVID-19

James Michaelson
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.14.23288579

Abstract

Optimizing vaccination to reduce COVID-19 death remains a challenge. A new method, Gompertzian Analysis, examines numbers of infectious disease cases and deaths, by age, on log graphs, capturing COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) by the Gompertz Mortality Equation. Gompertzian Analysis revealed that each of the first 4 Vaccination Events (primary and boosters) led to a ∼1/3rd reduction in COVID-19 Lethality. These vaccination reductions in COVID-19 Lethality were cumulative, persistent, and undiminished by variants, while vaccination’s impact on COVID-19 Infectivity (Cases/Population) was fleeting. Primary vaccination and 3 boosters gave an ∼85% reduction in COVID-19 Lethality, with projections suggesting ∼68% fewer deaths (∼267,000 to ∼85,000). Projections also suggest that 6 boosters may offer a ∼96% reduction in COVID-19 Lethality, to the familiar level of influenza, with a ∼91% reduction in COVID-19 deaths, to ∼25,000, fewer than automobile deaths. Gompertzian Analysis provides rational vaccination guidelines by age. Gompertzian Analysis points to a strategy molded by multiple vaccinations reducing COVID-19 Lethality, which is persistent, rather than focusing on reducing COVID-19 Infectivity, which is fleeting. Such a strategy, based on accumulating the necessary number of vaccinations (∼7), and possibly no more, would accept vaccination’s limited ability to prevent infection in exchange for its power to prevent death.

INTRODUCTION

How might COVID-19 be brought under control? Here, a new method, Gompertzian Analysis, is outlined, which uses data on the numbers of infectious disease cases and deaths to reveal hidden insights into how vaccines can be more effectively utilized to save many more lives.

METHODS

Let us call the examination of numbers of infectious disease cases and deaths on log graphs, Gompertzian Analysis, taking advantage of the ∼10,000-fold exponential increase in the risk of COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) from infancy to old age (FIGURE 1). This relationship between COVID-19 Lethality (D) and age (t) can be captured mathematically by the Gompertz Mortality Equation, and visualized graphically by sorting patients by age, and then examining deaths and cases on log graphs, yielding straight rows of data points, called here Gompertz Lines (FIGURE 1). Values for the two parameters of the Gompertz Mortality Equation, the Gompertzian Slope, Gs, and the Gompertzian Height”, GH, emerge by fitting the data to the exponential equation.

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.

COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) in the Pre-Vaccination era, visualizes the Gompertz Mortality Equation: log(D) = (GS · t) + log (GH), which is equivalent to Embedded Image, for the relationship between COVID-19 Lethality, D, the risk of death if infected, that is, (Deaths/Cases), vs age, t, captured by the parameters of the Gompertzian Slope, Gs (the rate of increase with age), and Gompertzian Height, GH (the location of the Gompertz Line on the log graph, up or down).3

For values from various datasets, see the APPENDIX.

As we shall see here, and in detail in the APPENDIX, Gompertzian Analysis of many datasets has revealed that vaccination, and other forces, do not appear to make a marked impact on the Gompertzian Slope, Gs, of the Gompertz Mortality Equation, of COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases), giving us a simple single number, GH, the Gompertzian Height, with which we can examine, predict, and test, the combined impacts of morbidity factors, Vaccination Events, infections, and age, into a single measure of COVID-19 Lethality. The cellular mechanism behind this exponential quality of mortality is examined in the companion manuscript to this communication1.

The results of Gompertzian Analysis described were from publicly available datasets, which can be found in the references here, and in the APPENDIX. For the terminology used here, see the APPENDIX.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

COVID-19’s Gompertzian Force of Mortality

The exponential relationship between age and risk of death, discovered for All-Cause Mortality by Gompertz in 18252 and for COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) by Levin and colleagues in 2020,3 and confirmed by others,4-9 is captured by the Gompertz Mortality Equation, appearing as straight Gompertz Lines on log graphs (FIGURE 1, left). On linear graphs, they appear as exponential curves, whose values from the pre-vaccination era reveal COVID-19’s shocking age bias, with individuals stealthily accumulating less than 1% chance of death from infancy to age 60, followed by the disease’s progressively more catastrophic, exponential, increase in COVID-19 lethality rising to about 3% at age 70, to almost 10% at 80, to about 25% at 90, and to about 80% at 100.

Each Vaccination Event decreased COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) by about 1/3rd

In FIGURE 2 are the values for COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases), by age, for groups of Israeli patients: “unvaccinated”; or “Only primary vaccination”; or “primary vaccination +1 booster”; or “primary vaccination +2 boosters”.10 For each Vaccination Event, the Gompertz Line, and thus Gompertzian Height, GH, of COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases), declined cumulatively (FIGURE 2, APPENDIX FIGURES 23-41, APPENDIX-TABLE I). Patients who had had only primary vaccination received a ∼36% reduction in COVID-19 Lethality, captured by GH, relative to the unvaccinated (+/-0.4%). Those with the first booster received yet an additional ∼36% reduction (+/-0.2%). Those with a second booster received one more additional reduction of ∼32%, for a total accumulated reduction in COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases), across all ages, of ∼75% (+/-0.6%).

FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.

COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases), by age, for groups of Israeli patients who have chosen one of four opportunities for vaccination: those who are “unvaccinated”; those who have had “Only primary vaccination”; or “primary vaccination +1 booster”; or “primary vaccination +2 boosters. This dataset excludes patients who have had infections, thus containing the impact of only vaccination on COVID-19 Lethality.

Similar datasets from multiple countries show similar declines in COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) with each Vaccination Event (See APPENDIX). This can be seen in data from Hungary11 (APPENDIX FIGURES 40-41), and from the USA, for 65 million patients, March 2022-July 2022.12 (APPENDIX FIGURES 33-39). Recently, data from the USA show a cumulative decline for all 3 boosters, the last of which was the Bivalent formulation (APPENDIX-FIGURES-41 and 42).13 Subtle differences between these various datasets are presented and discussed in the APPENDIX. Examination of the underlying cellular basis of COVID-19 Lethality, the mathematics for which is outlined in the companion communication to this manuscript,1 also suggests that the cellular changes induced by each sequential Vaccination Event would be expected to lead to a roughly equivalent, and additive, reduction in the Gompertzian Height, GH, of the Gompertz Mortality Equation (Michaelson and Huang, unpublished).

COVID-19 Lethality and Infectivity: 2021-2022

In FIGURE 3 are shown values provided by the CDC for approximately 70% of all COVID-19 cases in the USA for each week from April 2021 to June 2022, for both the vaccinated and unvaccinated, for individuals of age 50-64.12 Similar images for the other age groups can be seen in APPENDIX-FIGURE 19. This information makes it possible to chart the evolution of COVID-19 Infectivity (Cases/Population) and COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases), the features of which we shall examine in the next two sections.

FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.

COVID-19 Infectivity (Cases/Population) and COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases), USA April 2021 to June 2022, vaccinated and unvaccinated, age 50-64.12

COVID-19 Lethality is persistent

As can be seen in FIGURE 3 (and APPENDIX-FIGURE 19), not only was there no sign of fading of vaccine-induced reduction in COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) over the 15-months from April 2021 to June 2022, COVID-19 Lethality continued to decline, no doubt, by boosters and breakthrough infections. For the unvaccinated, COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) also declined, no doubt, by immunization by infection, at the sad price of lives lost (APPENDIX-FIGURE 18, APPENDIX-FIGURE 22).

For both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated, COVID-19 Lethality went up and down mildly over the 15 months, with small waves that varied several-fold in height. However, over the long term, COVID-19 Lethality declined roughly 10-fold from April 2021 to June 2022. These data provide us with a picture of vaccination’s impact on COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) being persistent and cumulative, with no sign of waning with time.

The persistence of COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases), and its cumulative reduction by vaccination, appears again and again in the data. Indeed, I have yet to find a convincing example of fading of COVID-19 Lethality. These many examples can be seen throughout the APPENDIX.

COVID-19 Infectivity is fleeting

While vaccinated individuals had lower levels of COVID-19 Infectivity (Cases/Population) than unvaccinated, over the 15-month period, this faded, with vaccinated individuals twice reaching the same level of infection as unvaccinated individuals (FIGURE 3, APPENDIX-FIGURE 19). Considerable additional data, from a great variety of populations and datasets, support this image, as can be found in exhaustive detail in the APPENDIX.

For both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, COVID-19 Infectivity (Cases/Population) went up and down wildly with time, with the huge waves, varying over a hundred+-fold difference in height, and displaying, over the long term, a roughly a 10-fold increase in the chance of infection from April 2021 to June 2022 (FIGURE 3, APPENDIX-FIGURE 19). Vaccinated people had lower rates of COVID-19 Infectivity (Cases/Population) than unvaccinated people, but the virus kept defeating the vaccines. These data provide us with a picture of vaccination’s impact on COVID-19 Infectivity as being fleeting, eventually waning with time.

The fleeting nature of COVID-19 Infectivity (Cases/Population), despite its temporary reduction by vaccination, however welcome, appears again and again in the data. These many examples can be seen throughout the APPENDIX.

What can be expected from sequential vaccinations: COVID-19 Lethality to negligible levels

What can be expected from sequential Vaccination Opportunities ? As we have seen above, for each of the first four Vaccination Opportunities (primary vaccination, 1st booster, 2nd booster, and 3rd booster) there have been cumulative reductions in COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases). The Gompertz Mortality Equations for each of these Vaccination Events, and their observed reductions in COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) are shown in FIGURES 4 and 5 and TABLE 1. These values show, across the ages, that primary vaccination leads to a ∼36% reduction in COVID-19 Lethality, in comparison to the unvaccinated. Primary vaccination plus 1 booster results in a ∼65% reduction, in comparison to the unvaccinated. Primary vaccination plus 2 boosters give an ∼75% reduction, while primary vaccination plus 3 boosters was likely to have led to an ∼85% reduction. (The precise value of this last reduction awaits the release of data on patients sorted by the number of Vaccination Events up to the bivalent booster: see APPENDIX for details).

FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.

Observed and expected cumulative declines COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) with each Vaccination Event, as captured by the Gompertz Mortality Equation. ∼ 1/3rd reductions for each Vaccination Event have been observed for the first 3 Vaccination Events (FIGURE 2, and other data: see APPENDIX). The precise value of the 4th Vaccination Event (Bivalent booster) has yet to be measured precisely, due to incomplete data, but appears to approximately this v alue.13 Also shown is the Gompertz Line for patients with influenza.16

FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.

Observed and expected cumulative declines COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases), graphed by the number of Vaccination Events. See FIGURE 4 for details.

The number of lives that can be saved by higher utilization of vaccination

How do these COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) values (FIGURES 4 and 5, TABLE 1) translate into lives saved? In 2022, 13% of Americans had had no COVID-19 vaccination, 31% were vaccinated without boosters, 39% had one booster, 17% had two boosters,12 and there were ∼267,000 COVID-19 deaths.14 The COVID-19 Lethality values described above, derived by Gompertzian Analysis from actual data, make it possible to calculate how many deaths would have been prevented, and can be prevented in the future, with greater use of vaccination (FIGURE 6, APPENDIX-FIGURE-46, and APPENDIX TABLE V). The practical execution of these calculations is straightforward; details can be found in the APPENDIX (APPENDIX-TABLES V and VI).

FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.

Calculation of USA deaths, ascribable to reductions in COVID-19 Lethality, had there been more vaccinations in 2022.

View this table:
TABLE 1.

Deaths/Million Infections (Values taken from FIGURE 4)

Even without taking into account vaccination’s reduction in infection, that is, reduction in COVID-19 Infectivity (Cases/Population), had all Americans utilized at least primary vaccination, the reduction in COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) would have resulted in the ∼267,000 COVID-19 deaths that occurred in 2022 being cut by ∼13% to ∼232,00 deaths (FIGURE 6). Had all Americans utilized at least primary vaccination and 1 booster, then COVID-19 deaths that occurred in 2022 would have been cut by ∼29% to ∼189,00. Had all Americans utilized at least primary vaccination and 2 boosters, then death would have been cut by ∼52% to ∼129,00. Had all Americans utilized primary vaccination and 3 boosters, then lives lost would likely have been cut by ∼68% to ∼85,00 deaths.

Gompertzian Analysis gives us rational vaccination guidelines for people of all ages

The findings of Gompertzian Analysis (FIGURE 4) make it possible to create rational, data-driven, age-specific vaccination guidelines for reducing the risk of COVID-19 death, as Offit has suggested.15 For example, most Americans accept the risk of driving: ∼120 automotive deaths/million-Americans/year. Should this risk level define our choices for vaccination, then primary vaccination and 1st booster would be wise if ∼age 20 or older, and the 2nd and 3rd boosters if ∼age 40 or older (TABLE 2). Not only would such a guideline allocate vaccines to those who would benefit, it would also save more than 99% of the lives that would be saved had people of every age been vaccinated. For a deeper look at such calculations, see APPENDIX.

View this table:
TABLE 2.

Deaths Prevented, by Last Vaccination Event/Million Infections; Recommended Vaccinations Highlighted

Future Vaccination Opportunities

An additional Vaccination Opportunity has been approved by the FDA for the Fall of 2023. One might wonder what impact that this vaccination, and others in the future, could have on COVID-19 outcome. We can project what might be the result, if each of these leads to the 1/3rd reduction in COVID-19 Lethality that occurred for the previous Vaccination Opportunities. As noted above, such a possibility is biologically and mathematically the most likely expectation of future impacts of vaccination, and is also soundly based on previous experience, but, as of yet, we lack data to know with certainty what the future might bring. Nonetheless, whether such projected reductions in fact repeat as more Vaccination Opportunities are made available can be known rapidly by using Gompertzian Analysis to monitor cases and deaths, and appropriate adjustments in policy can be made as we move forward.

In FIGURES 4 and 5, the Gompertz Mortality Equations for 4th, 5th and 6th boosters are shown, based on the possibility of additional 1/3rd reductions in COVID-19 Lethality for each booster. These projected values suggest that 4 boosters might offer the possibility of a ∼91% reduction in COVID-19 Lethality, in comparison to the unvaccinated, while the calculation for 5 boosters yields a value of a ∼94% reduction, and 6 boosters a ∼96% reduction.

The Gompertz Mortality Equation for influenza16 is also shown in FIGURES 4 and 5. Influenza’s Lethality (Deaths/Cases) lies essentially where the calculated COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) would roughly be after 7 Vaccination Events, that is, after a 6th booster. COVID-19 Lethality would be slightly lower than Influenza’s Lethality with just one more booster. This raises the possibility that additional Vaccination Opportunities might bring the lethal burden of COVID-19 down to, or even below, the familiar level we see for influenza.

These projected values can also be comprehended in terms of lives that might have been saved if more vaccinations had been utilized. As shown in FIGURE 6, these calculations suggest that a total of 6 boosters yields a value of a ∼91% reduction in lives lost, to ∼25,000 deaths, far fewer lives than are lost each year in automobile accidents.

These possibilities appear to merit examination by trial, whose outcomes could be assessed by Gompertzian Analysis. Gompertzian Analysis could also provide the basis for constructing rational vaccination guidelines by age, as described above, for allocating additional vaccines for optimal effect, as well as for ongoing monitoring of a strategy based on this approach, should it be put into practice.

Once a finite number of Vaccination Events are achieved (7?), no more may be required

Gompertzian Analysis suggests that once we avail ourselves of a finite number of Vaccination Opportunities, perhaps 7, we may need no more for the rest of our lives. The reduction in death, potentially down to levels lower than are caused by automobile accidents (FIGURE 6), and the reduction in the risk of death once infected, potentially down to a level lower than that for influenza (FIGURES 4 and 5), may well be sustained permanently, without ever requiring any more vaccinations.

While vaccination’s reduction in COVID-19 Infectivity (Cases/Population) has proven to be short lived, it’s reduction in COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) has been persistent, as we have seen in FIGURE 3 and in many other examples outlined in the APPENDIX. SARS-CoV-2 infection may well continue, but by accumulating enough Vaccination Events, possibly primary vaccination followed by 6 boosters, and then no more, the virus’s ability to cause death may be permanently reduced to levels vastly lower than what we see now.

Of course, continued monitoring will be essential to assess whether we ever do reach such a permanent state of negligible levels of COVID-19 death. However, the prospect of such a favorable future must be borne in mind as a possibility that may be achievable. In short, Gompertzian Analysis of the data seem to be telling us that with a few more vaccinations now, and hopefully no more vaccinations in the future, we may well bring COVID-19’s loss of life under control.

The Cellular Mechanisms Behind COVID-19 Lethality and Infectivity

Why do vaccines reduce the chance of COVID-19 Infectivity (Cases/Population)? Why do they reduce the chance of COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases), pushing down the Gompertzian Height, GH, of the exponential Gompertz Mortality Equation ? Behind these macroscopic manifestations of COVID-19 infection, death, and prevention, lie the microscopic worlds of cells. In the companion manuscript to this communication, 1 my colleagues and I have outlined how, by examining growth and development in units of numbers of cells, N,17-24 an approach we have called Cellular Phylodynamic Analysis23, the Gompertz Mortality Equation, affecting both aging’s impact on mortality generally, and COVID-19 Lethality specifically, can be traced to the slowing of growth that marks maturity. A likely explanation for this finding is that cell division makes us grow, but it also keeps us well, since biological materials decay with time, a toxic problem that is reversed when cells divide and replace at least half of their components anew.25,26 For the purposes of the issues examined in this report, this means that changes in numbers of cells as we age should allow us to trace the origin of COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) that marks old age to the loss of specific cells of the immune system. Counting these cells, in individuals who have had boosters, could estimate vaccination’s impact on the decline in COVID-19 Lethality, without having to rely on death data. Here, I have spared the reader this mathematics, but it can be found in this manuscript’s companions communication,1 and in abundance in the APPENDIX to that communication.

The same Cellular Phylodynamic math that could trace age-related COVID-19 Lethality to the cells in the immune system that fail as we age can also be used to track the cells in the other side of the immune system, which creates the reduction in COVID-19 Infectivity (Cases/Population) that prevents infection. Such math could be used to examine numbers of immune system cells making antibodies, and thus be put to work optimizing vaccine implementation (dose, schedule, adjuvant, etc.). Again, the methods for generating the math for accomplishing this task can be found in Reference 1.

Different vaccines have different reductions in COVID-19 Infectivity and lethality

Gompertzian Analysis of a variety of datasets has found that different vaccines have different reductions in COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) and COVID-19 Infectivity (Cases/Population) (APPENDIX TABLES I & II, APPENDIX FIGURE 12). In one population, vaccines with the highest and lowest reductions in COVID-19 Infectivity (Cases/Population) differed more than 5-fold.27 This information could be used to select vaccines with the greatest potential for reducing COVID-19 Infectivity (Cases/Population) and Lethality (Deaths/Cases).

In the APPENDIX, a third measure, Malthusian Lethality (Deaths/Population), captures the aggregate outcome of COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) and Infectivity (Cases/Population). This provides a way to optimize vaccine selection and implementation for the greatest possible reduction in death.

Since Gompertzian Analysis has measured the degree to which different vaccines lead to different reductions in COVID-19 Lethality and Infectivity, the possibility of examining, in parallel, the changes in cell numbers in the immune system that could be identified by Cellular Phylodynamic math noted above, is appealing. Such an approach offers the possibility of in vitro assays for COVID-19 Lethality and Infectivity, and their reductions by vaccination, and for COVID-19 Infectivity, the status of its persistence or fading with time.

The separateness of COVID-19 Lethality and Infectivity

Key to the Gompertzian Analysis described here has been the examination of COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases) and COVID-19 Infectivity (Cases/Population), separately. This has not only proved essential from a practical standpoint, it is also reasonable biologically, as infection is the result of the interaction of the virus with the surface of the mucosa, while death is the result of the massive proliferation of the virus throughout the body, as has been made clear by recent autopsy and virological studies. 28,29 It has been argued, and admirably supported by laboratory study, that vaccine protection against infection is principally accomplished by B-cells, and the antibodies that they make, while vaccine protection against death is principally accomplished by T-cells, and the cell-mediated responses that they make.30 As noted above, Cellular Phylodynamic math gives us a chance to track COVID-19 Lethality and COVID-19 Infectivity to the T- and B-cells that affect virus impact and count how they change upon immunization.

Variants

Gompertzian Analysis of two datasets of patients (UK31 and USA32) infected by different variants has revealed a lower level of COVID-19 Lethality (Deaths/Cases), in each age group, for delta, and a lower level yet for omicron (APPENDIX-FIGURES 48 & 49). In contrast, COVID-19 Infectivity (Cases/Population) increased with each new variant. Viral Darwinism would be expected to select for variants that become more infectious (COVID-19 Infectivity), but not necessarily more deadly (COVID-19 Lethality), and that is what appears to have been the case so far (APPENDIX-FIGURES 48 & 49).

Not only would it seem likely that COVID-19 Infectivity and COVID-19 Lethality, and their reductions by vaccination, to be separate things, it would also seem likely that the antigens on the spike protein to which COVID-19 Infectivity and Lethality react would be separate as well, with COVID-19 Infectivity B-Cell epitopes being subject to selection, in contrast to COVID-19 Lethality T-Cell epitopes, for which there is no reason for selection. Viruses may not care whether they kill or not, but Darwinism provides no selective reward for mutations that just increase the chance of death. This provides a motivation for the laboratory search for these suspected Infectivity and Lethality epitopes.

The Evolution of COVID-19

Monto and colleagues have shown that the four ordinary coronaviruses cause mild illnesses, early in life, and continue throughout life, with remarkably high numbers of reinfections.33 Of 1004 such infections, occurring in the 3418 individuals studied over an eight - year period, of whom 1378 were followed for 3 or more years, 30% were reinfections, ranging from 1 to 13 per individual. It appears likely that nearly all of these infections were reinfections from earlier points in time. One might hypothesize that the reason why these four ordinary coronaviruses are so harmless is that, from our early childhood onward, we have accumulated, at ages when the Gompertz Mortality Equation renders these infections innocuous, immunological protection against death for the rest of our lives. In contrast, the reason why SARS-CoV-2 is so harmful, is that it has arrived to us at ages when the Gompertz Mortality Equation has rendered it monstrously dangerous, without the immunological protection which childhood infection could have built for our present ages. Gompertzian Analysis also seems to be telling us that we might be able to create, in adult life, this missed childhood acquisition of resistance to COVID-19 death by sequential COVID-19 vaccination. These various notions can be tested, and indeed cry out to be tested, with the highest degree of skepticism. Indeed, all of the first findings of Gompertzian Analysis described here, and all of the possible actions that these findings suggest, can, and should, be tested, and monitored, by this approach, before any actions might be taken.

The Future of COVID-19

The findings of Gompertzian Analysis suggest that we will gradually evolve towards resistance to COVID-19 death by sequential immunization, either by infection, at the sad cost of lives lost, or by vaccination. The data suggest that in the developed world, this appears achievable by more of us getting more injections. For the world as a whole, this might be achieved by creating vaccines that yield a greater reduction in COVID-19 Lethality with each injection, and, one might hope, with a single injection. In this regard, current interest in creating nasal vaccines, and other advancements, are challenged by the need to combine improved suppression of COVID-19 Infectivity while maintaining, and hopefully also, strengthening, suppression of COVID-19 Lethality. As Morens, Taubenberger and Fauci have noted, “Apart from preventing initial infection, it is also important to consider the role of host immunity in limiting viral spread once infection has been established … preventing severe disease”34.

Gompertzian Analysis can aid in the formation of COVID-19 vaccination policy

An examination of COVID-19 vaccination policy statements, thoughtfully created by a number of national and international authorities, makes clear that a single approach for identifying which individuals, at which ages, should receive which vaccines, has yet to emerge.35-42 Gompertzian Analysis thus gives a method for molding population-wide policy so as to achieve the greatest possible reduction in COVID-19 deaths, as well as to create methods for tracking individual’s accumulation of Vaccination Events, to monitor the success of such efforts, and to modify guidance if policy does not achieve the goals expected.

A Strategy for COVID-19

Our vaccines have not been created, assessed, or approved for their capacity to reduce death, but for their capacity to reduce infection. The findings of Gompertzian Analysis suggest that we might be better off focusing on the achievable goal of reducing deaths rather than focusing on the goal, possibly unattainable, of eliminating infection. Gompertzian Analysis has already revealed that the data tell us that the use of all of the four approved Vaccination Opportunities (primary + 3 boosters) by more citizens can cut the number of COVID-19 deaths by 2/3rds. Gompertzian Analysis has further enticed us with the possibility of pushing the risk of COVID-19 death to a level lower than that of influenza, and the numbers of COVID-19 deaths to a level lower than automobile deaths. The key to reaching for such a goal may lie not in getting the latest vaccination, or even the best vaccine for reducing the chance of infection, but in acquiring the necessary number of vaccinations needed to build our resistance to COVID-19 death. Gompertzian Analysis provides us with a tool for reaching that goal.

Note: this study has not been peer reviewed, and the findings could change.

Data Availability

The results described were from publicly available datasets, which can be found in the references here

Acknowledgments

Many thanks for the excellent advice and suggestions by my colleagues, Michael Lynes, Luke Huang, and Samuel Preston.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Citi L, Su, J, Huang, L, Michaelson, J. Counting Cells By Age Tells Us How, and Why, and When, We Grow, and Become Old and Ill. 2023. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.01.05.23284244v1.
  2. ↵
    Gompertz, B. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 115: 513–585. (1825). “doi:10.1098/rstl.1825.0026 S2CID 145157003.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    Levin AT, Hanage WP, Owusu-Boaitey N, Cochran KB, Walsh SP, Meyerowitz-Katz G. Assessing the age specificity of infection fatality rates for COVID-19: systematic review, meta-analysis, and public policy implications. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;35(12):1123–1138. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00698-1. Epub 2020 Dec 8. PMID: 33289900; PMCID: PMC7721859.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Brazeau NF, Verity R, Jenks S, Fu H, Whittaker C, Winskill P, Dorigatti I, Walker PGT, Riley S, Schnekenberg RP, Hoeltgebaum H, Mellan TA, Mishra S, Unwin HJT, Watson OJ, Cucunubá ZM, Baguelin M, Whittles L, Bhatt S, Ghani AC, Ferguson NM, Okell LC. Estimating the COVID-19 infection fatality ratio accounting for seroreversion using statistical modelling. Commun Med (Lond). 2022 May 19;2:54. doi: 10.1038/s43856-022-00106-7. PMID: 35603270; PMCID: PMC9120146.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. O’Driscoll M, Ribeiro Dos Santos G, Wang L, Cummings DAT, Azman AS, Paireau J, Fontanet A, Cauchemez S, Salje H. Age-specific mortality and immunity patterns of SARS-CoV-2. Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7844):140–145. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2918-0. Epub 2020 Nov 2. PMID: 33137809.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. Verity R, Okell LC, Dorigatti I, Winskill P, Whittaker C, Imai N, Cuomo-Dannenburg G, Thompson H, Walker PGT, Fu H, Dighe A, Griffin JT, Baguelin M, Bhati a S, Boonyasiri A, Cori A, Cucunubá Z, FitzJohn R, Gaythorpe K, Green W, Hamlet A, Hinsley W, Laydon D, Nedjati-Gilani G, Riley S, van Elsland S, Volz E, Wang H, Wang Y, Xi X, Donnelly CA, Ghani AC, Ferguson NM. Estimates of the severity of coronavirus dis ease 2019: a model-based analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):669–677. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30243-7. Epub 2020 Mar 30. Erratum in: Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 15;:
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    Erratum in: Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May 4;: PMID: 32240634; PMCID: PMC7158570.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. Wood SN, Wit EC, Fasiolo M, Green PJ. COVID-19 and the difficulty of inferring epidemiological parameters from clinical data. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;21(1):27–28. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30437-0. Epub 2020 May 28. PMID: 32473661; PMCID: PMC725570 8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. Levin AT, Owusu-Boaitey N, Pugh S, Fosdick BK, Zwi AB, Malani A, Soman S, Besançon L, Kashnitsky I, Ganesh S, McLaughlin A, Song G, Uhm R, Herrera-Esposito D, de Los Campos G, Peçanha Antonio ACP, Tadese EB, Meyerowitz-Katz G. Assessing the burden of COVID-19 in developing countries: systematic review, meta-analysis and public policy implications. BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(5):e008477. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008477. PMID: 35618305; PMCID: PMC9136695.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Elo IT, Luck A, Stokes AC, Hempstead K, Xie W, Preston SH. Evaluation of Age Patterns of COVID-19 Mortality by Race and Ethnicity From March 2020 to October 2021 in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2212686. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12686
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    Erratum in: JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2228383. PMID: 35579900; PMCID: PMC9115616.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    Saban M, Myers V, Wilf-Miron R. Changes in infectivity, severity and vaccine effectiveness against delta COVID-19 variant ten months into the vaccination program: The Israeli case. Prev Med. 2022 Jan;154:106890. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106890. Epub 2021 Nov 17. PMID: 34800471; PMCID: PMC8596646.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Vokó Z, Kiss Z, Surján G, Surján O, Barcza Z, Pályi B, Formanek-Balku E, Molnár GA, Herczeg R, Gyenesei A, Miseta A, Kollár L, Wittmann I, Müller C, Kásler M. Na tionwide effectiveness of five SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in Hungary-the HUN-VE study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 Mar;28(3):398–404. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Nov 25. PMID: 34838783; PMCID: PMC8612758.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    CDC. Rates of COVID-19 Cases or Deaths by Age Group and Vaccination Status and Booster Dose; https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#rates-by-vaccine-status; Updated 9/20/2022: Contact Dr Michaelson for dataset downloaded on that date; https://data.cdc.gov/Public-Health-Surveillance/Rates-of-COVID-19-Cases-or-Deaths-by-Age-Group-and/d6p8-wqjm
  13. ↵
    Johnson AG, Linde L, Ali AR, DeSantis A, Shi M, Adam C, Armstrong B, Armstrong B, Asbell M, Auche S, Bayoumi NS, Bingay B, Chasse M, Christofferson S, Cima M, Cue to K, Cunningham S, Delgadillo J, Dorabawila V, Drenzek C, Dupervil B, Durant T, Fleischauer A, Hamilton R, Harrington P, Hicks L, Hodis JD, Hoefer D, Horrocks S, Hoskins M, Husain S, Ingram LA, Jara A, Jones A, Kanishka FNU, Kaur R, Khan SI, Kirkendall S, Lauro P, Lyons S, Mansfield J, Markelz A, Masarik J 3rd., McCormick D, Mendoza E, Morris KJ, Omoike E, Patel K, Pike MA, Pilishvili T, Praetorius K, Reed IG, Severson RL, Sigalo N, Stanislawski E, Stich S, Tilakaratne BP, Turner KA, Wiedeman C, Zaldivar A, Silk BJ, Scobie HM. COVID-19 Incidence and Mortality Among Unvaccinated and Vaccinated Persons Aged ≥12 Years by Receipt of Bivalent Booster Doses and Time Since Vaccination- 24 U.S. Jurisdictions, October 3, 2021-December 24, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023 Feb 10;72(6):145–152. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7206a3. PMID: 36757865; PMCID: PMC9925136.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/
  15. ↵
    Offit PA. Bivalent Covid-19 Vaccines - A Cautionary Tale. N Engl J Med. 2023 Feb 9;388(6):481–483. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2215780. Epub 2023 Jan 11. PMID: 36630616.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    CDC. Flu-Related Illnesses, Medical Visits, Hospitalizations, Deaths 2017 –2018 Flu Season. 2018 https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/2017-2018.htm
  17. ↵
    Michaelson J. Cell selection in development. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1987 May;62(2):115–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1987.tb01264.x. PMID: 3300794.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. Michaelson J. The role of molecular discreteness in normal and cancerous growth. Anticancer Res. 1999 Nov-Dec;19(6A):4853–67. PMID: 10697599.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. Chen LL, Nolan ME, Silverstein MJ, Mihm MC Jr., Sober AJ, Tanabe KK, Smith BL, Younger J, Michaelson JS. The impact of primary tumor size, lymph node status, and other prognostic factors on the risk of cancer death. Cancer. 2009 Nov 1;115(21):5071–83. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24565. PMID: 19658184.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. Michaelson JS, Cheongsiatmoy JA, Dewey F, Silverstein MJ, Sgroi D, Smith B, Tanabe KK. Spread of human cancer cells occurs with probabilities indicative of a nongenetic mechanism. Br J Cancer. 2005 Nov 28;93(11):1244–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602848. PMID: 16278668; PMCID: PMC2361524.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. Michaelson JS, Chen LL, Bush D, Fong A, Sm ith B, Younger J. Improved web-based calculators for predicting breast carcinoma outcomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Aug;128(3):827–35. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1366-9. Epub 2011 Feb 15. PMID: 21327471.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. Oeffinger KC, Fontham ET, Etzioni R, Herzig A, Michaelson JS, Shih YC, Walter LC, Church TR, Flowers CR, LaMonte SJ, Wolf AM, DeSantis C, Lortet-Tieulent J, Andrews K, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Saslow D, Smith RA, Brawley OW, Wender R; American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average R isk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society. JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1599–614. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12783
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    Erratum in: JAMA. 2016 Apr 5;315(13):1406. PMID: 26501536; PMCID: PMC4831582.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    Stadler T, Pybus OG, Stumpf MPH. Phylodynamics fo r cell biologists. Science. 2021 Jan 15;371(6526): eaah6266. doi: 10.1126/science.aah6266. PMID: 33446527
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Michaelson J. Cellular selection in the genesis of multicellular organization. Lab Invest. 1993 Aug;69(2):136–51. PMID: 8350596.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    Gladyshev VN et al. Molecular damage in aging. Nature Aging. volume 1, pages 1096–106 (2021)
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    Gladyshev VN. On the cause of aging and control of lifespan: heterogeneity leads to inevitable damage accumulation, causing aging; control of damage composition and rate of ac cumulation define lifespan. Bioessays. 2012 Nov;34(11):925–9. doi: 10.1002/bies.201200092. Epub 2012 Aug 23. PMID: 22915358; PMCID: PMC3804916
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Vokó Z, Kiss Z, Surján G, Surján O, Barcza Z, Pályi B, Formanek-Balku E, Molnár GA, Herczeg R, Gyenesei A, Miseta A, Kollár L, Wittmann I, Müller C, Kásler M. Nationwide effectiveness of five SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in Hungary-the HUN-VE study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 Mar;28(3):398–404. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Nov 25. PMID: 34838783; PMCID: PMC8612758.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Stein SR, Ramelli SC, Grazioli A, Chung JY, Singh M, Yinda CK, Winkler CW, Sun J, Dickey JM, Ylaya K, Ko SH, Platt AP, Burbelo PD, Quezado M, Pittaluga S, Purcell M, Munster VJ, Belinky F, Ramos-Benitez MJ, Boritz EA, Lach IA, Herr DL, Rabin J, Saharia KK, Madathil RJ, Tabatabai A, Soherwardi S, McCurdy MT; NIH COVID-19 Autopsy Consortium; Peterson KE, Cohen JI, de Wit E, Vannella KM, Hewitt SM, Kleiner DE, Chertow DS. SARS-CoV-2 infection and persistence in the human body and brain at autopsy. Nature. 2022 Dec;612(7941):758–763. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05542-y. Epub 2022 Dec 14. PMID: 36517603; PMCID: PMC9749650.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Cardeñoso Domingo L, Roy Vallejo E, Zurita Cruz ND, Chicot Llano M, Ávalos Pérez-Urria E, Barrios A, Hernando Santos J, Ortiz J, Rodríguez García SC, Martín Ramírez A, Ciudad Sañudo M, Marcos C, García Castillo E, Fontán García-Rodrigo L, González B, Méndez R, Iturrate I, Sanz García A, Villa A, Sánchez Azofra A, Quicios B, Arribas D, Álvarez Rodríguez J, Patiño P, Trigue ros M, Uriarte M, Triguero Martínez A, Arévalo C, Galván Román JM, García-Vicuña R, Ancochea J, Soriano JB, Canabal A, Muñoz Calleja C, De la Cámara R, Suarez Fernández C, González Álvaro I, Rodríguez-Serrano DA; PREDINMUN-COVID Group. Relevant SARS-CoV-2 viremia is associated with COVID-19 severity: Prospective cohort study and validation cohort. J Med Virol. 2022 Nov;94(11):5260–5270. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27989. Epub 2022 Aug 9. PMID: 35811284; PMCID: PMC9349374.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Wherry EJ, Barouch DH. T cell immunity to C OVID-19 vaccines. Science. 2022 Aug 19;377(6608):821–822. doi: 10.1126/science.add2897. Epub 2022 Aug 18. PMID: 35981045
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Nyberg T, Ferguson NM, Nash SG, Webster HH, Flaxman S, Andrews N, Hinsley W, Bernal JL, Kall M, Bhatt S, Blomquist P, Zaidi A, Volz E, Aziz NA, Harman K, Funk S, Abbott S; COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) consortium, Hope R, Charlett A, Chand M, Ghani AC, Se aman SR, Dabrera G, De Angelis D, Presanis AM, Thelwall S. Comparative analysis of the risks of hospitalisation and death associated with SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) and delta (B.1.617.2) variants in England: a cohort study. Lancet. 2022 Apr 2;399(10332):1303–1312. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00462-7. Epub 2022 Mar 16. PMID: 35305296; PMCID: PMC8926413
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Skarbinski J, Wood MS, Chervo TC, Schapiro JM, Elkin EP, Valice E, Amsden LB, Hsiao C, Quesenberry C, Corley DA, Kushi LH. Risk of severe clinical outco mes among persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection with differing levels of vaccination during widespread Omicron (B.1.1.529) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variant circulation in Northern California: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Aug;12:100297. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100297. Epub 2022 Jun 16. PMID: 35756977; PMCID: PMC9212563.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Petrie JG, Bazzi LA, McDermott AB, Follmann D, Esposito D, Hatcher C, Mateja A, Narpala SR, O’Connell SE, Martin ET, Monto AS. Coronavirus Occurrence in the Household Influenza Vaccine Evaluation (HIVE) Cohort of Michigan Households: Reinfection Frequency and Serologic Responses to Seasonal and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronaviruses. J Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 2;224(1):49–59. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab161. PMID: 337 55731; PMCID: PMC8083771.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Morens DM, Taubenberger JK, Fauci AS. Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenzaviruses, and other respiratory viruses. Cell Host Microbe. 2023 Jan 11;31(1):146–157. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.11.016. PMID: 36634620; PMCID: PMC9832587
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    FDA. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Authorizes Second Booster Dose of Two COVID-19 Vaccines for Older and Immunocompromised Individuals. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-authorizes-second-booster-dose-two-covid-19-vaccines-older-and
  36. FDA. COVID-19 Bivalent Vaccine Boosters. https://www.fda.gov/emergen cy-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/covid-19-bivalent-vaccine-boosters
  37. CDC. Frequently Asked Questions about COVID-19 Vaccination. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/faq.html
  39. WHO. Highlights from the Meeting of the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization 20-22 march 2023. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/immunization/sage/2023/march-2023/sage_march_2023_meeting_highlights.pdf?sfvrsn=a8e5be9_4
  40. An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS). National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI). Guidance on an additional COVID-19 booster dose in. the spring of 2023 for individuals at high risk of severe illness due to COVID-19. March 3, 2023. https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/services/publications/vaccines-immunization/national-advisory-committee-immunization-guidance-additional-covid-19-booster-dose-spring-2023-individuals-high-risk-severe-illness-due-covid-19/statement.pdf
  42. ↵
Back to top
Posted April 15, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
A New Vaccination Assessment Method and Strategy for COVID-19
James Michaelson
medRxiv 2023.04.14.23288579; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.14.23288579
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area