Abstract
Introduction Results of the CLARITY-AD and GRADUATE I and II trials rekindled discussion on the impact of amyloid-targeting drugs. We use a Bayesian approach to quantify how a rational observer would have updated their prior beliefs based on new trial results.
Methods We used publicly available data from the CLARITY-AD and GRADUATE I & II trials to estimate the effect of reducing amyloid on CDR-SB score. A range of prior positions were then updated according to Bayes Theorem using these estimates.
Results After updating with new trial data, a wide range of starting positions resulted in credible intervals that did not include no effect of amyloid reduction on CDR-SB.
Discussion For a range of starting beliefs and assuming veracity of underlying data, rational observers would conclude there is a small benefit of amyloid-reductions on cognition. This benefit must be weighed against opportunity cost and side effect risk.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Institute of Aging (NIA) under award numbers R01AG057869 (MMG, MCP), K99AG073454 (SFA), and K00AG068431 (RC).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used ONLY openly available summary statistics.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
