Abstract
Introduction A multisystem inflammatory illness-sarcoidosis is characterized by organ failure, noncaseating granuloma development, and inflammation. The most frequently affected tissues are the lungs and pulmonary lymph nodes, although other tissues can also be affected including the heart. Cardiac Sarcoidosis can be lethal and result in conduction abnormalities, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. As endocardial biopsy is invasive, Advanced imaging techniques, such as cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) could be used to diagnose cardiac sarcoidosis and evaluate prognosis. Small and focal cardiac abnormalities have been successfully identified by (DE)-MRI. This comprehensive study and meta-analysis was carried out to aid in the CS diagnosis.
Methodology Using a strategy based on the search terms-sarcoidosis and CMR/MRI separately, we searched-Pubmed, Google Scholar, Embose, Cochrane Library. Studies were disqualified if they lacked enough data to fill out a 2*2 contingency table. We strictly adhered to the Japanese criteria for diagnosing cases. Data from 12 studies with a total of 785 cases with TP of 212 was included.
Results We found the cardiac MRI Sensitivity= 0.934 (95% CI = 0.904 to 0.964), Specificity = 0.875 (95% CI = 0.826 to 0.923), PPV= 0.752 (95% CI = 0.682 to 0.822), Younden index= 0.808 and AUC (Area under curve) for ROC plot= 0.904 with a Diagnostic accuracy of 0.892 for detecting sarcoidosis.
Conclusion Cardiac MRI is a good and reliable screening and diagnostic tool that can be employed as a non-interventional method for diagnosis of Cardiac Sarcoidosis and future prognosis. Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac sarcoidosis using MRI, a meta-analysis.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The article is a met analysis has all the papers used in the analysis present in the reference section
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Email: Sabuwalanaqeeya{at}gmail.com
Email: dwijaraval2005{at}gmail.com
Email: hetvip2808{at}gmail.com
Email: falaksaiyad2000{at}gmail.com
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
