Abstract
Background Occupational short-latency respiratory disease (SLRD; predominantly asthma, rhinitis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and occupational infections) prevalence is difficult to determine but certain occupations may be associated with increased susceptibility.
Aims This study aimed to examine which occupations and industries are currently at high risk for SLRD and determine their respective suspected causal agents based on cases reported by physicians to the Surveillance of Work-related and Occupational Respiratory Disease (SWORD) scheme in the UK.
Methods SLRD cases reported to the SWORD scheme between 1999 and 2019 were analysed to determine directly standardised rate ratios (SRR) by occupation against the average rate for all other occupations combined.
Results Bakers and flour confectioners showed significantly raised SRR for occupational rhinitis (234.4 [95% CI, 200.5 - 274.0]) and asthma (59.9 [95% CI, 51.6 - 69.5]). Chemical and related process operatives also presented raised SRR values for these two conditions, with SRR of 29.5 [95% CI, 24.3 - 35.7] and 21.0 [95% CI, 16.9 - 26.1] for rhinitis and asthma, respectively. SRR were also significantly raised for vehicle spray painters when considering occupational asthma (63.5 [95% CI, 51.5 - 78.3]) alone, and laboratory technicians were also amongst the top three increased SRR for rhinitis (18.7 [95% CI, 15.1 - 23.1]). The suspected agents most frequently associated with these occupations and conditions were flour, isocyanates, and laboratory animals and insects. Metal machining setters and setter-operators showed increased SRR for occupational hypersensitivity pneumonitis (42.0 [95% CI, 29.3 - 60.3]), largely due to cutting/soluble oils. The occupation mostly affected by infectious disease was welding trades (12.9 [95% CI, 5.7 - 29.3]) and the suspected causal agent predominantly reported for this condition was pathogens and microorganisms, with a predominance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Conclusions This study identified the occupational groups at increased risk of developing a SLRD based on data recorded over a recent two-decade period in the UK. Asthma and rhinitis were identified as the prevailing conditions and hypersensitivity pneumonitis as a potentially rising respiratory problem in the metalworking industry.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The Health and Occupation Research (THOR) network has been supported by grants from the Health and Safety Executive in the UK (contract number PRJ500). The funders/sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The information, views and opinion set out in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official view of the Health and Safety Executive or that of HSE policy makers.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Health and Occupation Research (THOR) network (including EPIDERM and SWORD) has National Health Service ethics approval given by the Northwest (Haydock) Research Ethics Committee (22/NW/0082).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
