Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large-scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets

Anja L Frei, Anthony McGuigan, Ritik RAK Sinha, Mark A Glaire, Faiz Jabbar, Luciana Gneo, Tijana Tomasevic, Andrea Harkin, Tim J Iveson, Mark Saunders, Karin Oein, Noori Maka, Francesco Pezella, Leticia Campo, Jennifer Hay, Joanne Edwards, Owen Sansom, Caroline Kelly, Ian Tomlinson, Wanja Kildal, Rachel S Kerr, David J Kerr, Håvard E Danielsen, Enric Domingo, TransSCOT consortium, David N Church, View ORCID ProfileViktor H Koelzer
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.19.23290216
Anja L Frei
1Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
2Life Science Zurich Graduate School, PhD Program in Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony McGuigan
3Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ritik RAK Sinha
3Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark A Glaire
3Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Faiz Jabbar
3Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luciana Gneo
3Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tijana Tomasevic
3Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Harkin
4Cancer Research UK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tim J Iveson
5Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Saunders
6The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karin Oein
7Glasgow Tissue Research Facility, University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noori Maka
7Glasgow Tissue Research Facility, University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesco Pezella
8Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leticia Campo
9Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Hay
7Glasgow Tissue Research Facility, University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanne Edwards
10School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Owen Sansom
10School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
11Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, UK
12Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Kelly
4Cancer Research UK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian Tomlinson
9Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wanja Kildal
13Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel S Kerr
9Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J Kerr
8Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Håvard E Danielsen
8Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
13Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
14Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Enric Domingo
9Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
12Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David N Church
3Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
15Oxford NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: david.church{at}well.ox.ac.uk viktor.koelzer{at}usz.ch
Viktor H Koelzer
1Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
3Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
9Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Viktor H Koelzer
  • For correspondence: david.church{at}well.ox.ac.uk viktor.koelzer{at}usz.ch
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) imaging can provide comprehensive quantitative and spatial information for multiple immune markers for tumour immunoprofiling. However, application at scale to clinical trial samples sourced from multiple institutions is challenging due to pre-analytical heterogeneity. This study reports an analytical approach to the largest multiparameter immunoprofiling study of clinical trial samples to date. We analysed 12,592 tissue microarray (TMA) spots from 3,545 colorectal cancers (CRC) sourced from more than 240 institutions in two clinical trials (QUASAR 2 and SCOT) stained for CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, FoxP3, pan-cytokeratin and DAPI by mIF. TMA slides were multi-spectrally imaged and analysed by cell-based and pixel-based marker analysis. We developed an adaptive thresholding method to account for inter- and intra-slide intensity variation in TMA analysis. Applying this method effectively ameliorated inter- and intra-slide intensity variation improving the image analysis results compared to methods using a single global threshold. Correlation of CD8 data derived by our mIF analysis approach with single-plex chromogenic immunohistochemistry (IHC) CD8 data derived from subsequent sections indicates the validity of our method (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients ρ between 0.63 and 0.66, p-value ≪ 0.01) as compared to current gold standard analysis approach. Evaluation of correlation between cell-based and pixel-based analysis results confirms equivalency (ρ > 0.8, p ≪ 0.01, except for CD20 in epithelium region) of both analytical approaches. These data suggests that our adaptive thresholding approach can enable analysis of mIF-stained clinical trial TMA datasets by digital pathology at scale for precision immunoprofiling.

Competing Interest Statement

DNC has participated in advisory boards for MSD and has received research funding on behalf of the TransSCOT consortium from HalioDx for analyses independent of this study. VHK has served as an invited speaker on behalf of Indica Labs and Sharing Progress in Cancer Care (SPCC), is on an advisory board of Takeda and has received project-based research funding from The Image Analysis Group and Roche outside of the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Funding Statement

The SCOT trial was funded by the Medical Research Council (transferred to NETSCC - Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation) (Grant Ref: G0601705), the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme (Grant Ref: 14/140/84), Cancer Research UK (CRUK) Core Clinical Trials Unit Glasgow Funding (Funding Ref: C6716/A9894), and the Swedish Cancer Society. The TransSCOT sample collection was funded by a CRUK Clinical Trials Awards and Advisory Committee - Sample Collection (Grant Ref: C6716/A13941). The QUASAR2 trial was funded by an unrestricted educational grant to DJK from Roche. This study was funded by the Oxford NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, a CRUK Advanced Clinician Scientist Fellowship (Ref: C26642/A27963) to DNC, a CRUK award (Ref: A25142) to the CRUK Glasgow Centre and core funding to VHK by the University of Zurich. VHK acknowledges funding by the Promedica Foundation (Ref: F-87701-41-01). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval for patient recruitment and sample collection in the SCOT and QUASAR 2 trial was obtained centrally and at all recruiting centres (REC reference number 07/S0703/136 and 04/MRE/11/18). Ethical approval for anonymised tumour molecular analysis was granted by Oxfordshire Research Ethics Committee B (REC 05\Q1605\66).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Abstract revised; small revisions in manuscript; Figure 5A updated

Data Availability

The datasets pertaining to the SCOT trial used during the current study are available from the TransSCOT collaboration on reasonable request. Applications for analysis of TransSCOT samples are welcome and should be addressed to JH: Jennifer.Hay{at}glasgow.ac.uk. Datasets and samples from the QUASAR2 trial are available upon reasonable request and should be addressed to DNC: david.church{at}well.ox.ac.uk

  • List of abbreviations

    CRC
    colorectal cancer
    IF
    immunofluorescence
    IHC
    immunohistochemistry
    mIF
    multiplex immunofluorescence
    QC
    quality control
    Q2
    QUASAR 2
    SITC
    Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer
    TMA
    tissue microarray
    WSI
    whole slide image
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted August 16, 2023.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large-scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large-scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets
    Anja L Frei, Anthony McGuigan, Ritik RAK Sinha, Mark A Glaire, Faiz Jabbar, Luciana Gneo, Tijana Tomasevic, Andrea Harkin, Tim J Iveson, Mark Saunders, Karin Oein, Noori Maka, Francesco Pezella, Leticia Campo, Jennifer Hay, Joanne Edwards, Owen Sansom, Caroline Kelly, Ian Tomlinson, Wanja Kildal, Rachel S Kerr, David J Kerr, Håvard E Danielsen, Enric Domingo, TransSCOT consortium, David N Church, Viktor H Koelzer
    medRxiv 2023.05.19.23290216; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.19.23290216
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large-scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets
    Anja L Frei, Anthony McGuigan, Ritik RAK Sinha, Mark A Glaire, Faiz Jabbar, Luciana Gneo, Tijana Tomasevic, Andrea Harkin, Tim J Iveson, Mark Saunders, Karin Oein, Noori Maka, Francesco Pezella, Leticia Campo, Jennifer Hay, Joanne Edwards, Owen Sansom, Caroline Kelly, Ian Tomlinson, Wanja Kildal, Rachel S Kerr, David J Kerr, Håvard E Danielsen, Enric Domingo, TransSCOT consortium, David N Church, Viktor H Koelzer
    medRxiv 2023.05.19.23290216; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.19.23290216

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Pathology
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)