Abstract
Interoceptive mismatch is a perceptual discrepancy between ascending bodily signals and higher-order representation of anticipated physiological state. Inspired by predictive coding models, we present autonomic perceptual mismatch as a measure of this discrepancy for clinical application to brain-body interactions. Joint hypermobility is disproportionately found in individuals with anxiety disorders. Previous work has shown atypical autonomic reactivity represents a likely mediating mechanism consequent of altered connective tissue in the vasculature and nervous system.
This fMRI study investigates the neural substrates of autonomic perceptual mismatch on affective processing in the hypermobility-anxiety interaction. We compared regional brain activity during emotional face processing in participants with and without hypermobility and generalized anxiety disorder diagnosis, then tested association with perceptual mismatch.
In the brain, autonomic perceptual mismatch correlated with enhanced activation in emotion processing and autonomic control regions, notably anterior cingulate cortex. Anxious individuals exhibited increased mid-insula cortex activity in relation to perceptual mismatch. Activity was decreased within the inferior frontal gyrus, a region implicated in cognitive control. Dysautonomia mediated the link between hypermobility and anxiety.
Together, these findings support a neural basis of an autonomic perceptual mismatch model in a clinical sample. This is supported by the engagement of neural systems for emotion-cognition and interoception. This work highlights convergent aspects of neurodiversity, mental health, connective tissue disorders and brain-body interactions relevant to precision healthcare.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding for this project came via a fellowship to JAE (MRC MR/K002643/1). JAE was also supported by MQ Transforming Mental Health and Versus Arthritis (MQF 17/19).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Brighton and Hove National Research Ethics Service (NREC) committee gave ethical approval for this work (ref 12/LO/1942).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Manuscript abstract and introduction revised
Data Availability
All data in the study can be found in the supplementary materials or are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
