Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the spread of denialist messages regarding COVID-19 in Brazil, specifically examining how social inequalities contributed to the misconception of chloroquine having a protective effect against the virus.
Study design: Three countrywide population-based studies were conducted in 2020 (May 14-21, June 4-7, and June 21-24), including 133 Brazilian cities (n=88,772).
Methods: Participants were asked whether they believed in chloroquine’s protective effect against infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus (no/yes/don’t know). A jeopardy index score to assess cumulative social deprivation was calculated based on gender, racial and socioeconomic variables. Descriptive analysis and inequality measures (Slope Index of Inequality – SII; and Concentration Index – CIX) were used to evaluate the main association under investigation. Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate 3-category outcome according to independent variables.
Results: Overall, 47.9% of participants either believed that chloroquine prevented against COVID-19 or said, “I don’t know”. Misbelief and lack of knowledge about chloroquine were greater among the most vulnerable (lowest levels of education and socioeconomic status). Absolute and relative inequalities were observed according to jeopardy index. Lack of knowledge was 2.49 greater among women than among men. Race/ethnicity minorities, those with low education and low socioeconomic status were more likely to erroneously believe that chloroquine prevented against COVID-19. The highest absolute inequality was observed for the category “I don’t know” (SII = -14.3).
Conclusions: Misbelief of chloroquine’s protective effect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus was high in Brazil. People with greater social vulnerability were more likely to wrongly believe chloroquine prevented against COVID-19
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by the Brazilian Ministry of Health, Instituto Serrapilheira, Brazilian Collective Health Association and JBS Fazer o Bem Faz Bem. The funder has no role in study design, data collection/analysis, interpretation of findings, or manuscript writing.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study complied with all ethical precepts and legislation governing research with human beings and was approved by the National Research Ethics Commission (CAAE 30721520.7.1001.5313). All participants signed an informed consent form.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests.
Data Availability
The EPICOVID19 datasets are freely available online.
