Abstract
Background and Objectives Different forms of phosphorylated tau (p-tau) have shown high potential as Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) biomarkers in both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma. Hence, we hypothesized that tau peptides showing concomitant phosphorylation at two different sites may provide an increased diagnostic value. We therefore developed and validated a new Simoa® immunoassay detecting tau simultaneously phosphorylated at T181 and T231 (C231D181) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma.
Methods Technical validation of the C231D181 Simoa® assay included standard curve development, assessment of antibodies cross-reactivity, dilutional linearity, sensitivity, as well as intra- and inter-assay precision. Subsequently, we measured CSF C231D181, p-tau181, and p-tau231 in two cohorts: discovery (MCI-AD n=21, AD dementia n=19, CTRL n=15) and validation (preclinical AD n=19, MCI-AD n=20, AD dementia n=16, frontotemporal dementia n=39, CTRL n=24). Additionally, in the discovery cohort, C231D181, p-tau181, and p-tau231 levels were measured in matched plasma samples.
Results Specificity of the assay was assessed using a synthetic peptide simultaneously phosphorylated at T181 and T231, while cross-reactivity was excluded with a mix of single-site phosphorylated peptides (T181 or T231). Both in discovery and validation cohorts, CSF C231D181, p-tau181, and p-tau231 levels were significantly elevated in all AD groups vs. CTRL. As assessed in discovery cohort, plasma p-tau231 and p-tau181 levels enabled effective discrimination of AD continuum groups from CTRL (AUC plasma p-tau231: CTRL vs. MCI-AD=0.925, CTRL vs. AD-dem=0.947; AUC plasma p-tau181: CTRL vs. MCI-AD=0.877, CTRL vs. AD-dem=0.943) while plasma C231D181 did not change among clinical groups.
Discussion A new ultrasensitive immunoassay detecting tau simultaneously phosphorylated at T181 and T231 was developed and validated. While we found this phosphorylated tau form to be significantly elevated across the AD continuum in CSF, in plasma it did not show changes among the diagnostic groups. The differences between CSF and plasma suggest matrix-specific protein processing. Our findings support evidence for qualitative and quantitative importance of tau phosphorylation across AD continuum and warrant further investigation, including assessment of tau simultaneously phosphorylated at multiple sites.
Competing Interest Statement
At the time of the project, DS was employed by Quanterix Corporation (Billerica, MA, USA). LP served as Member of Advisory Boards for Fujirebio, IBL, Roche, and Merck. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding Statement
This project has received funding from the European Union′s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 860197 (ALW, LP). GB is supported by the Postdoctoral Fellowship for Basic Scientists grant of the Parkinson′s Foundation (Award ID: PF-PRF-934916).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All the procedures were performed in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki and International Conference on Harmonization guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. All the patients and/or their legal representatives gave informed written consent for the lumbar puncture and the inclusion in the study that was approved by the local Ethics Committee (Comitato Etico Aziende Sanitarie Regione Umbria 19369/AV and 20942/21/OV).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
