Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance in various natural language processing tasks, utilizing their language generation capabilities and knowledge acquisition potential from unstructured text. However, when applied to the biomedical domain, LLMs encounter limitations, resulting in erroneous and inconsistent answers. Knowledge Graphs (KGs) have emerged as valuable resources for structured information representation and organization. Specifically, Biomedical Knowledge Graphs (BKGs) have attracted significant interest in managing large-scale and heterogeneous biomedical knowledge. This study evaluates the capabilities of ChatGPT and existing BKGs in question answering, knowledge discovery, and reasoning. Results indicate that while ChatGPT with GPT-4.0 surpasses both GPT-3.5 and BKGs in providing existing information, BKGs demonstrate superior information reliability. Additionally, ChatGPT exhibits limitations in performing novel discoveries and reasoning, particularly in establishing structured links between entities compared to BKGs. To overcome these limitations, future research should focus on integrating LLMs and BKGs to leverage their respective strengths. Such an integrated approach would optimize task performance and mitigate potential risks, thereby advancing knowledge in the biomedical field and contributing to overall well-being.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute On Aging (NIA) and NIH/National Center For Complementary & Integrative Health (NCCIH).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced are available online
