Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Deep Learning in Automating Breast Cancer Diagnosis from Microscopy Images

View ORCID ProfileQiangqiang Gu, Naresh Prodduturi, View ORCID ProfileSteven N. Hart
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.15.23291437
Qiangqiang Gu
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Qiangqiang Gu
Naresh Prodduturi
2Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven N. Hart
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905
2Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905
Ph.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Steven N. Hart
  • For correspondence: Hart.Steven{at}mayo.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women. With early diagnosis, some breast cancers are highly curable. However, the concordance rate of breast cancer diagnosis from histology slides by pathologists is unacceptably low. Classifying normal versus tumor breast tissues from microscopy images of breast histology is an ideal case to use for deep learning and could help to more reproducibly diagnose breast cancer. Since data preprocessing and hyperparameter configurations have impacts on breast cancer classification accuracies of deep learning models, training a deep learning classifier with appropriate data preprocessing approaches and optimized hyperparameter configurations could improve breast cancer classification accuracy.

Methods and Material Using 12 combinations of deep learning model architectures (i.e., including 5 non-specialized and 7 digital pathology-specialized model architectures), image data preprocessing, and hyperparameter configurations, the validation accuracy of tumor versus normal classification were calculated using the BreAst Cancer Histology (BACH) dataset.

Results The DenseNet201, a non-specialized model architecture, with transfer learning approach achieved 98.61% validation accuracy compared to only 64.00% for the digital pathology-specialized model architecture.

Conclusions The combination of image data preprocessing approaches and hyperparameter configurations have a profound impact on the performance of deep neural networks for image classification. To identify a well-performing deep neural network to classify tumor versus normal breast histology, researchers should not only focus on developing new models specifically for digital pathology, since hyperparameter tuning for existing deep neural networks in the computer vision field could also achieve a high (often better) prediction accuracy.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the University of Minnesota Graduate School Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship for the year of 2022-2023, and the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology at the Mayo Clinic.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 16, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Deep Learning in Automating Breast Cancer Diagnosis from Microscopy Images
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Deep Learning in Automating Breast Cancer Diagnosis from Microscopy Images
Qiangqiang Gu, Naresh Prodduturi, Steven N. Hart
medRxiv 2023.06.15.23291437; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.15.23291437
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Deep Learning in Automating Breast Cancer Diagnosis from Microscopy Images
Qiangqiang Gu, Naresh Prodduturi, Steven N. Hart
medRxiv 2023.06.15.23291437; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.15.23291437

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Pathology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)