Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Automating intended target identification for paraphasias in discourse using a large language model

View ORCID ProfileAlexandra C. Salem, Robert C. Gale, Mikala Fleegle, Gerasimos Fergadiotis, Steven Bedrick
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.18.23291555
Alexandra C. Salem
1Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alexandra C. Salem
  • For correspondence: salem{at}ohsu.edu
Robert C. Gale
1Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mikala Fleegle
2Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Portland State University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerasimos Fergadiotis
2Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Portland State University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Bedrick
1Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose To date there are no automated tools for the identification and fine-grained classification of paraphasias within discourse, the production of which is the hallmark characteristic of most people with aphasia (PWA). In this work we fine-tune a large language model (LLM) to automatically predict paraphasia targets in Cinderella story retellings.

Method Data consisted of 353 Cinderella story retellings containing 2,489 paraphasias from PWA, for which research assistants identified their intended targets. We supplemented this training data with 256 sessions from control participants, to which we added 2,427 synthetic paraphasias. We conducted four experiments using different training data configurations to fine-tune the LLM to automatically “fill in the blank” of the paraphasia with a predicted target, given the context of the rest of the story retelling. We tested the experiments’ predictions against our human-identified targets and stratified our results by ambiguity of the targets and clinical factors.

Results The model trained on controls and PWA achieved 46.8% accuracy at exactly matching the human-identified target. Fine-tuning on PWA data, with or without controls, led to comparable performance. The model performed better on targets with less human ambiguity, and on paraphasias from participants with less severe or fluent aphasia.

Conclusion We were able to automatically identify the intended target of paraphasias in discourse using just the surrounding language about half of the time. These findings take us a step closer to automatic aphasic discourse analysis. In future work, we will incorporate phonological information from the paraphasia to further improve predictive utility.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grant R01DC015999 (Principal Investigators: Steven Bedrick and Gerasimos Fergadiotis).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Data is available from AphasiaBank to all members of the AphasiaBank consortium group (https://aphasia.talkbank.org/).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Conflict of Interest Statement We have no known conflict of interest to disclose.

  • Funding Statement This work was supported by National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grant R01DC015999 (Principal Investigators: Steven Bedrick and Gerasimos Fergadiotis).

Data Availability

Data is available from AphasiaBank to all members of the AphasiaBank consortium group (https://aphasia.talkbank.org/).

https://aphasia.talkbank.org/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 22, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Automating intended target identification for paraphasias in discourse using a large language model
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Automating intended target identification for paraphasias in discourse using a large language model
Alexandra C. Salem, Robert C. Gale, Mikala Fleegle, Gerasimos Fergadiotis, Steven Bedrick
medRxiv 2023.06.18.23291555; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.18.23291555
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Automating intended target identification for paraphasias in discourse using a large language model
Alexandra C. Salem, Robert C. Gale, Mikala Fleegle, Gerasimos Fergadiotis, Steven Bedrick
medRxiv 2023.06.18.23291555; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.18.23291555

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neurology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)