Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol

View ORCID ProfileMeredith Vanstone, View ORCID ProfileRebecca H. Correia, Michelle Howard, Elizabeth Darling, Hamideh Bayrampour, View ORCID ProfileAndrea Carruthers, Amie Davis, Dima Hadid, View ORCID ProfileErin Hetherington, View ORCID ProfileAaron Jones, Sujane Kandasamy, Cassandra Kuyvenhoven, Jessica Liauw, View ORCID ProfileSarah D. McDonald, Caroline Mniszak, Monica L. Molinaro, Manisha Pahwa, Tejal Patel, Marina Sadik, Njideka Sanya, Katrina Shen, View ORCID ProfileDevon Greyson
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.10.23292463
Meredith Vanstone
1Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Meredith Vanstone
  • For correspondence: vanstomg{at}mcamster.ca
Rebecca H. Correia
2Health Research Methodology graduate program, McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rebecca H. Correia
Michelle Howard
1Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Darling
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hamideh Bayrampour
4Midwifery Program, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Carruthers
1Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrea Carruthers
Amie Davis
1Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dima Hadid
5Health Policy PhD program, McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erin Hetherington
6Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Occupational Health, McGill University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Erin Hetherington
Aaron Jones
10Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aaron Jones
Sujane Kandasamy
7Department of Child and Youth Health, Brock University
8Department of Medicine, McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cassandra Kuyvenhoven
1Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica Liauw
9Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah D. McDonald
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University
10Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University
11Department of Radiology, McMaster University
12Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sarah D. McDonald
Caroline Mniszak
13School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monica L. Molinaro
1Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manisha Pahwa
5Health Policy PhD program, McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tejal Patel
1Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marina Sadik
1Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Njideka Sanya
1Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katrina Shen
1Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Devon Greyson
13School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Devon Greyson
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Pregnant people have a higher risk of severe COVID-19 disease. They have been disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 infection control policies, which exacerbated conditions resulting in intimate partner violence, healthcare access, and mental health distress. This project examines the impact of accumulated individual health decisions and describes how perinatal care and health outcomes changed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objectives

  1. Quantitative strand: Describe differences between 2019, 2021, and 2022 birth groups related to maternal vaccination, perinatal care, and mental health care. Examine the differential impacts on racialized and low-income pregnant people.

  2. Qualitative strand: Understand how pregnant people’s perceptions of COVID-19 risk influenced their decision-making about vaccination, perinatal care, social support, and mental health.

Methods and analysis This is a Canadian convergent parallel mixed-methods study. The quantitative strand uses a retrospective cohort design to assess birth group differences in rates of Tdap and COVID-19 vaccination, gestational diabetes screening, length of post-partum hospital stay, and onset of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder, using administrative data from ICES, formerly the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Ontario) and PopulationData BC (PopData) (British Columbia). Differences by socioeconomic and ethnocultural status will also be examined. The qualitative strand employs qualitative description to interview people who gave birth between May 2020-December 2021 about their COVID-19 risk perception and health decision-making process. Data integration will occur during design and interpretation.

Ethics and dissemination This study received ethical approval from McMaster University and the University of British Columbia. Findings will be disseminated via manuscripts, presentations, and patient-facing infographics.

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • Population-based administrative data cohorts are very large, ensuring that analyses are high-powered.

  • Mixed-methods design will allow us to offer explanation for changes in healthcare use observed through administrative data.

  • Cross-provincial design permits examination of the potential impacts of COVID-19 infection prevention and control policies on pregnant people’s health.

  • Use of Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation will allow us to examine differences in healthcare use according to economic, racial, and immigration factors.

  • Team includes 5 co-investigators with lived experience of pandemic pregnancies.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

Our study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, (NCT05663762).

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research grant number 179921. SDM and MV are supported by a Tier 2 Canada Research Chairs. MM is supported by a Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (HiREB) has reviewed and approved the study (14632, 15100C). The University of British Columbia Research Ethics Board has also reviewed and approved the study (H22-01905). Written consent will be obtained for each qualitative study participant.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT05663762

Data Availability

Qualitative data are not available for sharing when participants consented to participate in the study, they did not consent to access transcripts or data beyond what is reported within this report. The dataset for the quantitative portion of this study is held securely in coded form at ICES and PopData BC. While legal data sharing agreements between these data stewards and data providers prohibit ICES and PopData BC from making the dataset publicly available, access may be granted to those who meet pre-specified criteria for confidential access. Readers are welcome to contact the research team for further information.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 12, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol
Meredith Vanstone, Rebecca H. Correia, Michelle Howard, Elizabeth Darling, Hamideh Bayrampour, Andrea Carruthers, Amie Davis, Dima Hadid, Erin Hetherington, Aaron Jones, Sujane Kandasamy, Cassandra Kuyvenhoven, Jessica Liauw, Sarah D. McDonald, Caroline Mniszak, Monica L. Molinaro, Manisha Pahwa, Tejal Patel, Marina Sadik, Njideka Sanya, Katrina Shen, Devon Greyson
medRxiv 2023.07.10.23292463; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.10.23292463
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol
Meredith Vanstone, Rebecca H. Correia, Michelle Howard, Elizabeth Darling, Hamideh Bayrampour, Andrea Carruthers, Amie Davis, Dima Hadid, Erin Hetherington, Aaron Jones, Sujane Kandasamy, Cassandra Kuyvenhoven, Jessica Liauw, Sarah D. McDonald, Caroline Mniszak, Monica L. Molinaro, Manisha Pahwa, Tejal Patel, Marina Sadik, Njideka Sanya, Katrina Shen, Devon Greyson
medRxiv 2023.07.10.23292463; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.10.23292463

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)