Abstract
Aim To characterize practice patterns of low vision services among Optometrists in Ghana.
Methods The nationwide cross-sectional survey identified entities through the Ghana Optometrists Association (GOA) registry and utilized a semi-structured questionnaire to consolidate survey information that comprises practitioners’ demographics, available services, diagnostic equipment, barriers to service provision and utilization, and interventions.
Results 300 Optometrists were identified, with 213 surveyed (71% response rate). About fifty percent (52.6%) were in private practice, and more than two-thirds (77%) did not provide low vision services. Most (≥ 70%) established lack of assistive devices, and basic eye care examination kits as the main barriers to low vision service provision. Similarly, practitioners reported unawareness of the presence of low vision centres (76.1%), and high cost of low vision aids (75.1%) as the prime perceived barriers for patients to utilize low vision services. Continuous professional development and public education (89-90%) were suggestive interventions to improve the uptake of low vision services. After statistical adjustment, private facility type (Adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.35, p = 0.010) and lack of basic eye examination kits (AOR = 0.32, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with reduced odds of low vision service provision. Conversely, 15-19 years of work experience (AOR = 8.49, p = 0.022) were significantly associated with increased odds of low vision service provision.
Conclusion Overall, the results indicate inadequate low vision coverage and service delivery. Government policies must be directed towards equipping practitioners with equipment and subsidize patient cost of treatment to optimize low vision care.
What is already known on this topic?Fewer past studies have reported poor low vision service delivery in selected regions and hospitals in Ghana. However, this evidence is an under-representation of the coverage of low vision service delivery in the country and warrants a more robust design to obtain comprehensive estimates.
What this study adds The current study extends the existing literature by providing extensive evidence on the practice pattern of low vision services, barriers, and interventions in Ghana.
How this study might affect research, practice, or policy?The unmet needs of low vision service delivery for residual vision necessitate institutionalizing pragmatic strategies to augment low vision service delivery, uptake, and delivery in the region.
Synopsis/Precis This paper highlights the scope of low vision practice in Ghana. The findings show an unmet low vision coverage, significantly influenced by practice settings, years of work experience, and rudimentary eye examination equipment.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Committee on Human Research, Publication and Ethics, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana (CHRPE/AP/286/22).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data availability statement
The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
