Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Can computer simulation support strategic service planning? Modelling a large integrated mental health system on recovery from COVID-19

Livia Pierotti, Jennifer Cooper, View ORCID ProfileCharlotte James, Kenah Cassels, Emma Gara, Rachel Denholm, Richard Wood
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.19.23292289
Livia Pierotti
1NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, University of Bristol
2NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Livia.pierotti{at}bristol.ac.uk
Jennifer Cooper
1NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, University of Bristol
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charlotte James
1NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, University of Bristol
3Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Integrated Care Board, UK National Health Service
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Charlotte James
Kenah Cassels
3Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Integrated Care Board, UK National Health Service
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emma Gara
3Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Integrated Care Board, UK National Health Service
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel Denholm
1NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, University of Bristol
4HDR UK Southwest
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Wood
3Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Integrated Care Board, UK National Health Service
4HDR UK Southwest
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background COVID-19 has had a significant impact on people’s mental health and mental health services. During the first year of the pandemic, existing demand was not fully met while new demand was generated, resulting in large numbers of people requiring support. To support mental health services to recover without being overwhelmed, it was important to know where services will experience increased pressure, and what strategies could be implemented to mitigate this.

Methods We implemented a computer simulation model of patient flow through an integrated mental health service in Southwest England covering General Practice (GP), community-based ‘talking therapies’ (IAPT), acute hospital care, and specialist care settings. The model was calibrated on data from 1 April 2019 to 1 April 2021. Model parameters included patient demand, service-level length of stay, and probabilities of transitioning to other care settings. We used the model to compare ‘do nothing’ (baseline) scenarios to ‘what if’ (mitigation) scenarios, including increasing capacity and reducing length of stay, for two future demand trajectories from 1 April 2021 onwards.

Results The results from the simulation model suggest that, without mitigation, the impact of COVID-19 will be an increase in pressure on GP and specialist community based services by 50% and 50-100% respectively. Simulating the impact of possible mitigation strategies, results show that increasing capacity in lower-acuity services, such as GP, results in demand being shifted to other parts of the mental health system while decreasing length of stay in higher acuity services is insufficient to mitigate the impact of increased demand.

Conclusion In capturing the interrelation of patient flow related dynamics between various mental health care settings, we demonstrate the value of computer simulation for assessing the impact of interventions on system flow.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was partially supported by Elizabeth Blackwell Institute.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Yorkshire & The Humber Leeds East Research Ethics Committee granted NHS HRA Research Database approval for the Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire (BNSSG) system-wide database in 2020 (REC Reference Number: 20/YH/0185, date: 28 July 2020). Ethical approval is given for processing of personal data by the research database team for research conducted on COVID-19-related priority areas identified by the wider health and care system (in accordance with the Health Service Control of Patient Information Regulations 2002 (COPI) directive for COVID-19-related analyses). Under General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the data controller was BNSSG Clinical Commissioning Group. The data from general practice electronic medical records were extracted according to existing data sharing agreements and in line with GDPR and Caldicott principles under pandemic conditions and in accordance with government guidelines and the COPI directive.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

No data are available. This study used a discrete event simulation tool purpose built for modelling patient pathways. Model code used for this study is freely available at https://github.com/nhs-bnssg-analytics.

https://github.com/nhs-bnssg-analytics/simulation-dts-renege

  • List of abbreviations

    NHS
    National Health Scotland
    BNSSG ICS
    Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire healthcare Integrated Care System
    SWD
    System Wide Dataset
    MH
    mental health
    AWP
    Avon and Wilshire Mental Health Partnership NHS trust
    MHP
    Mental Health Provide
    IAPT
    Improving Access to Physiological Therapy
    GP
    general practice
    CI
    Confidence Intervals
    DTS
    Discrete time simulation.
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted July 23, 2023.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Can computer simulation support strategic service planning? Modelling a large integrated mental health system on recovery from COVID-19
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Can computer simulation support strategic service planning? Modelling a large integrated mental health system on recovery from COVID-19
    Livia Pierotti, Jennifer Cooper, Charlotte James, Kenah Cassels, Emma Gara, Rachel Denholm, Richard Wood
    medRxiv 2023.07.19.23292289; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.19.23292289
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Can computer simulation support strategic service planning? Modelling a large integrated mental health system on recovery from COVID-19
    Livia Pierotti, Jennifer Cooper, Charlotte James, Kenah Cassels, Emma Gara, Rachel Denholm, Richard Wood
    medRxiv 2023.07.19.23292289; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.19.23292289

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)