Abstract
Background COVID-19 has had a significant impact on people’s mental health and mental health services. During the first year of the pandemic, existing demand was not fully met while new demand was generated, resulting in large numbers of people requiring support. To support mental health services to recover without being overwhelmed, it was important to know where services will experience increased pressure, and what strategies could be implemented to mitigate this.
Methods We implemented a computer simulation model of patient flow through an integrated mental health service in Southwest England covering General Practice (GP), community-based ‘talking therapies’ (IAPT), acute hospital care, and specialist care settings. The model was calibrated on data from 1 April 2019 to 1 April 2021. Model parameters included patient demand, service-level length of stay, and probabilities of transitioning to other care settings. We used the model to compare ‘do nothing’ (baseline) scenarios to ‘what if’ (mitigation) scenarios, including increasing capacity and reducing length of stay, for two future demand trajectories from 1 April 2021 onwards.
Results The results from the simulation model suggest that, without mitigation, the impact of COVID-19 will be an increase in pressure on GP and specialist community based services by 50% and 50-100% respectively. Simulating the impact of possible mitigation strategies, results show that increasing capacity in lower-acuity services, such as GP, results in demand being shifted to other parts of the mental health system while decreasing length of stay in higher acuity services is insufficient to mitigate the impact of increased demand.
Conclusion In capturing the interrelation of patient flow related dynamics between various mental health care settings, we demonstrate the value of computer simulation for assessing the impact of interventions on system flow.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was partially supported by Elizabeth Blackwell Institute.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Yorkshire & The Humber Leeds East Research Ethics Committee granted NHS HRA Research Database approval for the Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire (BNSSG) system-wide database in 2020 (REC Reference Number: 20/YH/0185, date: 28 July 2020). Ethical approval is given for processing of personal data by the research database team for research conducted on COVID-19-related priority areas identified by the wider health and care system (in accordance with the Health Service Control of Patient Information Regulations 2002 (COPI) directive for COVID-19-related analyses). Under General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the data controller was BNSSG Clinical Commissioning Group. The data from general practice electronic medical records were extracted according to existing data sharing agreements and in line with GDPR and Caldicott principles under pandemic conditions and in accordance with government guidelines and the COPI directive.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
No data are available. This study used a discrete event simulation tool purpose built for modelling patient pathways. Model code used for this study is freely available at https://github.com/nhs-bnssg-analytics.
https://github.com/nhs-bnssg-analytics/simulation-dts-renege
List of abbreviations
- NHS
- National Health Scotland
- BNSSG ICS
- Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire healthcare Integrated Care System
- SWD
- System Wide Dataset
- MH
- mental health
- AWP
- Avon and Wilshire Mental Health Partnership NHS trust
- MHP
- Mental Health Provide
- IAPT
- Improving Access to Physiological Therapy
- GP
- general practice
- CI
- Confidence Intervals
- DTS
- Discrete time simulation.
