Abstract
Background Accurate and fast measurement of physical activity is important for surveillance. Even though many physical activity questionnaires (PAQ) are currently used in research, it is unclear which of them is the most reliable, valid, and easy to use. This systematic review aimed to identify existing brief PAQs, describe and compare their measurement properties, and assess their level of readability.
Methods We performed a systematic review based on the PRISMA statement. Literature searches were conducted in six scientific databases in March 2022. Articles were included if they evaluated validity and/or reliability of brief (i.e., with a maximum of three questions) physical activity or exercise questionnaires intended for healthy adults. Due to the heterogeneity of studies, data were summarized narratively. The level of readability was calculated according to the Flesch-Kincaid formula.
Results In total, 34 articles published in English or Spanish were included, evaluating 31 distinct brief PAQs. The studies indicated moderate to good levels of reliability for the PAQs. However, the majority of results showed weak validity when validated against objective measurements and demonstrated weak to moderate validity when validated against other PAQs. Most of the assessed PAQs met the criterion of being "short," allowing respondents to complete them in less than one minute either by themselves or with an interviewer. However, only 17 questionnaires had a readability level that indicates that the PAQ is easy to understand for the majority of the population.
Conclusions This review identified a variety of brief PAQs, but most of them were evaluated in only a single study. The methods used to assess measurement properties varied widely across studies, limiting the comparability between different PAQs and making it challenging to identify a single tool as the most suitable. Furthermore, PAQs employed different concepts for measuring physical activity, necessitating consideration of measurement properties and assessment goals when selecting a specific tool. None of the evaluated brief PAQs allowed for the measurement of whether a person fulfills the main WHO physical activity recommendations. Future development or adaptation of PAQs should prioritize readability as an important factor to enhance their usability.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was conducted as part of projects funded by the German Federal Ministry of Health (ZMI5-2522WHO001, ZMI5-2523WHO001). The ministry was neither involved in writing this manuscript nor in the decision to submit the article for publication. Furthermore, we acknowledge financial support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg within the funding programme "Open Access Publication Funding".
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Figures and tables have been added to the manuscript text.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
List of abbreviations:
- BPAAT
- Brief Physical Activity Assessment Tool
- EHIS-PAQ
- European Health Interview Survey Physical Activity Questionnaire
- GPAQ
- Global Physical Activity Questionnaire
- IPAQ
- International Physical Activity Questionnaire
- JACC
- Japan Collaborative Cohort Questionnaire
- L-CAT
- The Stanford Leisure-Time Activity Categorical Item
- NPAQ-short
- The Nordic Physical Activity Questionnaire-short
- PA
- physical activity
- PAQ
- physical activity questionnaire
- SIPAM
- Single Item Physical Activity Measure
- SR-PA L7
- The Seven-level Single-Question Scale for Self-Reported Leisure Time Physical Activity
- TAM
- Total Activity Measure
