Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Validity, reliability, and readability of single-item and short physical activity questionnaires for use in surveillance: a systematic review

View ORCID ProfileAntonina Tcymbal, Sven Messing, Rachel Mait, Roberto Galindo Perez, Taiyeba Akter, Ivo Rakovac, Peter Gelius, Karim Abu-Omar
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.19.23292870
Antonina Tcymbal
1Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Gebbertstr. 123b, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Antonina Tcymbal
  • For correspondence: antonina.tcymbal{at}fau.de
Sven Messing
1Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Gebbertstr. 123b, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel Mait
1Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Gebbertstr. 123b, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto Galindo Perez
1Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Gebbertstr. 123b, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Taiyeba Akter
1Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Gebbertstr. 123b, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivo Rakovac
2World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Marmorvej 51, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Gelius
1Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Gebbertstr. 123b, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karim Abu-Omar
1Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Gebbertstr. 123b, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Accurate and fast measurement of physical activity is important for surveillance. Even though many physical activity questionnaires (PAQ) are currently used in research, it is unclear which of them is the most reliable, valid, and easy to use. This systematic review aimed to identify existing brief PAQs, describe and compare their measurement properties, and assess their level of readability.

Methods We performed a systematic review based on the PRISMA statement. Literature searches were conducted in six scientific databases in March 2022. Articles were included if they evaluated validity and/or reliability of brief (i.e., with a maximum of three questions) physical activity or exercise questionnaires intended for healthy adults. Due to the heterogeneity of studies, data were summarized narratively. The level of readability was calculated according to the Flesch-Kincaid formula.

Results In total, 34 articles published in English or Spanish were included, evaluating 31 distinct brief PAQs. The studies indicated moderate to good levels of reliability for the PAQs. However, the majority of results showed weak validity when validated against objective measurements and demonstrated weak to moderate validity when validated against other PAQs. Most of the assessed PAQs met the criterion of being "short," allowing respondents to complete them in less than one minute either by themselves or with an interviewer. However, only 17 questionnaires had a readability level that indicates that the PAQ is easy to understand for the majority of the population.

Conclusions This review identified a variety of brief PAQs, but most of them were evaluated in only a single study. The methods used to assess measurement properties varied widely across studies, limiting the comparability between different PAQs and making it challenging to identify a single tool as the most suitable. Furthermore, PAQs employed different concepts for measuring physical activity, necessitating consideration of measurement properties and assessment goals when selecting a specific tool. None of the evaluated brief PAQs allowed for the measurement of whether a person fulfills the main WHO physical activity recommendations. Future development or adaptation of PAQs should prioritize readability as an important factor to enhance their usability.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research was conducted as part of projects funded by the German Federal Ministry of Health (ZMI5-2522WHO001, ZMI5-2523WHO001). The ministry was neither involved in writing this manuscript nor in the decision to submit the article for publication. Furthermore, we acknowledge financial support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg within the funding programme "Open Access Publication Funding".

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Figures and tables have been added to the manuscript text.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

  • List of abbreviations:

    BPAAT
    Brief Physical Activity Assessment Tool
    EHIS-PAQ
    European Health Interview Survey Physical Activity Questionnaire
    GPAQ
    Global Physical Activity Questionnaire
    IPAQ
    International Physical Activity Questionnaire
    JACC
    Japan Collaborative Cohort Questionnaire
    L-CAT
    The Stanford Leisure-Time Activity Categorical Item
    NPAQ-short
    The Nordic Physical Activity Questionnaire-short
    PA
    physical activity
    PAQ
    physical activity questionnaire
    SIPAM
    Single Item Physical Activity Measure
    SR-PA L7
    The Seven-level Single-Question Scale for Self-Reported Leisure Time Physical Activity
    TAM
    Total Activity Measure
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted July 24, 2023.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Validity, reliability, and readability of single-item and short physical activity questionnaires for use in surveillance: a systematic review
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Validity, reliability, and readability of single-item and short physical activity questionnaires for use in surveillance: a systematic review
    Antonina Tcymbal, Sven Messing, Rachel Mait, Roberto Galindo Perez, Taiyeba Akter, Ivo Rakovac, Peter Gelius, Karim Abu-Omar
    medRxiv 2023.07.19.23292870; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.19.23292870
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Validity, reliability, and readability of single-item and short physical activity questionnaires for use in surveillance: a systematic review
    Antonina Tcymbal, Sven Messing, Rachel Mait, Roberto Galindo Perez, Taiyeba Akter, Ivo Rakovac, Peter Gelius, Karim Abu-Omar
    medRxiv 2023.07.19.23292870; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.19.23292870

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Public and Global Health
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)