Machine learning fairness analysis on clinical data of The EMory BrEast imaging Dataset (EMBED)

Vikas Ramachandra; Mohit Sethi

doi:10.1101/2023.07.23.23293043

Abstract

This paper explores the use of machine learning (ML) for predictive modeling on clinical data from the EMory BrEast imaging Dataset (EMBED) [1] with a focus on ML model fairness analysis. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate fair machine learning models that can accurately predict breast cancer risk. We trained and tested various machine-learning models. Our findings show that machine learning can be effective for predicting breast cancer risk or diagnosing breast cancer, and that fairness considerations are crucial in the development of such models. Overall, our study highlights the potential of machine learning for clinical applications while emphasizing the need for ethical and fair practices in this field.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes