Abstract
Background Preconception and interconception care improves the health outcomes of women and communities.
Problem Little is known about how prepared and willing Australian midwives are to provide preconception and interconception care.
Aim The aim of this study was to explore midwives’ knowledge, perspectives and learning needs, and barriers and enablers to delivering preconception and interconception care.
Methods We conducted a cross-sectional exploratory study of midwives working in any Australian maternity setting. An online survey was administered that included items measuring midwives’ self-rated knowledge; education needs and preferences; attitudes and perceptions towards the pre and interconception care; and views on future service and workforce planning.
Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and demographic characteristics (e.g., years of experience, model of care) associated with knowledge and attitudes regarding pre- and inter-conception care were examined using univariate logistic regression analysis. Qualitative data were captured through open-ended questions and analysed using inductive content analysis.
Findings We collected responses from (n=338) out of 355 midwives who were eligible for this study working across all Australian models of care (completion rate 96%). Most participants (n=290; 85%) rated their overall knowledge about pre and interconception health for women as excellent, above average or average. The only variable associated with overall knowledge was years of experience, with participants more than 11 years of experience more likely to report above average to excellent knowledge (OR 3.11; 95% CI 1.09, 8.85). The majority (n=257; 76%) were interested in providing pre and interconception care more regularly within their role. Low prioritisation in service planning/budgeting was the most frequently selected barrier to providing preconception and interconception care.
Implications Findings revealed that midwives are prepared and willing to provide preconception and interconception care. Pre and post registration professional development; service and funding reform; and policy development are critical to enable Australian midwives’ provision of pre and interconception care.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Dr Zoe Bradfield (ZB) is a recipient of a CRE HiPP Capacity Building Award which has resourced this research (https://hipp.org.au). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Human Research Ethical approval was granted through Curtin University (HRE2022-0565).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
