Abstract
Early sport specialization (ESS) is common among adolescent athletes due to desire of reaching elite status; however, the long-term impact of ESS on sports injury (SI) rates is not fully understood. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the effect of ESS on SI rates during elite sport participation. Search included PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, ERIC, and Medline databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify published peer-reviewed articles from inception to 23 March 2023. Eligible studies reported numbers of elite athletes in collegiate, national, and professional teams in ESS and their counterpart category, as well as the portion of each group with at least one SI. Studies on concussion or non-contact injuries, or without explicit injury reports during elite sprot participation were excluded. Five articles were included in the review; 3 reported SIs on collegiate and 2 reported on professional athletes. A total of 3087 athletes were included (ESS = 45%). The overall effect was not significant and demonstrated that ESS athletes had a lower odd (OR=0.7) of a SI during elite sport participation. Articles with clear reports are scarce, and thus limit the impact of the findings in this study. High heterogeneity was evident in this analysis, largely due to lack of standardized terminology, evaluation, and data representation. Prospective studies that consider diverse athlete population of the same sport are warranted.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the peer-reviewed literature. Five studies' data were included in this review. This study did not include any other human data accessible online (except the peer-reviewed published manuscript).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Not available for contributing authors.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
