Characteristics of Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome (CCAS) in patients with acute cerebellar stroke and its impact on outcome

Introduction

The cerebellum influences motor functions, such as walk, balance, and coordinated movement; however, until recently, its function in language, cognition, and affect has not received much attention [1]. In the 1980s, Schmahmann [2] defined a new clinical symptom, cerebellar cognitive-affective syndrome (CCAS), a cognitive impairment as a result of damage to the cerebellum. CCAS is characterized by four domains: executive dysfunction, visuospatial cognitive impairment, language dysfunction, and affective disorders. The connection between the cerebellum and cognition has become clearer with advances in research related to anatomical aspects of CCAS, functional imaging of healthy individuals, and neuropsychological aspects of patients with cerebellar lesions. In stroke patients, the incidences of cognitive impairment and personality disorders are high at 86% and 64%, respectively [3]. However, owing to the low awareness of CCAS in clinical practice, mild cognitive dysfunction is often overlooked [4]. This can be attributed to the absence of a strict definition or diagnostic model for CCAS, leaving the diagnosis at the clinician’s discretion, usually based on a comprehensive neuropsychological examination. In addition, the wide variety of CCAS symptoms require extensive and time-consuming assessment. Many studies have identified efficient assessment methods, however, they vary across studies and are inconsistent [5–7]. In 2018, Hoche et al. [8] developed the CCAS Scale (CCAS-S), a screening test for CCAS, that consists of 10 neuropsychological items and requires 12–15 min for assessment. In recent years, the number of studies using the CCAS-S has increased, but most have been conducted in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia or Friedreich’s ataxia (FRDA) [9, 10]. In contrast, very few studies utilizing the CCAS-S in acute stroke patients have been conducted, and only one has investigated the prevalence of CCAS and utility of CCAS-S in stroke patients [11]. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the characteristics of CCAS in acute cerebellar stroke patients using the CCAS-S. In addition, we investigated relationship between the CCAS-S and physical function, activities of daily living (ADL), length of hospital stay, and outcome.

Methods

Results

During the research period, 301 acute stroke patients were admitted to our hospital, 14 of whom met the inclusion criteria. After excluding one patient as their assessment was impeded due to comorbid acute myocardial infarction, thirteen cases were included in the final analysis. All the patients underwent rehabilitation during hospitalization.

Patient characteristics of both the study groups are shown in Table 1. The median age was 75 years (IQR:73–79). Cerebellar lesions were ischemic in seven, hemorrhagic in six, left-sided in five, right-sided in seven, and bilateral in one patient. The affected vascular territories were the superior cerebellar artery (SCA) in 8 cases, the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) in 1 case, and the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) in 4 cases. A week after the onset, the median CCAS-S, MMSE, and SARA score was 72 (IQR: 66–80), 28 (IQR: 26–29), 6 (IQR: 2–15), respectively. At discharge, the median FIM and BI was 96 (IQR: 85–113) and 80 (IQR: 70–100), respectively. The median hospitalization days was 18 days (IQR: 13–21). Nine patients were directly discharged from the hospital and four were transferred to a rehabilitation centre.

Discussion

This study investigated the characteristics of CCAS in patients experiencing their first acute cerebellar infarction. Based on the CCAS-S, 11/13 patients (84.6%) showed cognitive impairment due to cerebellar lesions; however, their MMSE score was within the normal range. The most frequently failed items in the CCAS-S were semantic fluency, category switching, and similarities compared with age-matched controls, and CCAS was more severe in SCA territory stroke than in AICA/PICA stroke. Despite the high frequency of CCAS in acute cerebellar stroke, it did not affect the outcome.

The CCAS-S is useful as a screening assessment for CCAS associated with cerebellar lesions [8]; however very few studies have used CCAS-S in patients with stroke, and only one study has reported the CCAS prevalence and used CCAS-S in acute stroke patients [11]. In a study conducted by Abderrakib et al., 25 patients with acute cerebellar stroke were evaluated with CCAS-S within one week of onset, and 1, 3, and 21 patients were classified as having possible, probable, and definite CCAS, respectively. In our study, 10/13 (76.9%) patients had definite CCAS, indicating that cognitive dysfunction is common in acute cerebellar stroke patients. Considering that the MMSE scores were normal in all our patients, the CCAS-S was useful in detecting CCAS.

Using the original cutoff value [8], the most frequently failed items were phonemic fluency (77%), verbal recall (69%), category switching (62%), semantic fluency (54%), and similarities (46%). However, this cutoff value has been criticized for not considering age and education [15]. Therefore, in this study, we compared these results with those of age-matched healthy controls. The CCAS-S items showing abnormalities included category switching, semantic fluency, and similarity. Low scores on the phonemic fluency and verbal recall items may be due to advanced age. In a previous study by Abderrakib et al. [11], category switching and backward digit span were the most commonly failed items, followed by phonemic fluency and verbal recall. The mean age was 64 years, which is younger than that in our study, and the results were based on the original cutoff value.

The advantage of the CCAS-S is that the severity and extent of CCAS can be compared between studies. In a study on spinocerebellar ataxia type 3, 22 patients with age of 51.9 ± 10.0 years were analyzed and the average total CCAS-S score was 81.9 ± 9.2 [16]. Regarding spinocerebellar ataxia type 2, 64 patients with a mean age of 48.77 ± 12.02 years showed a mean total CCAS-S score of 69.95 ± 13.48 [17]. Regarding chronic cerebellar stroke, 22 patients with age of 47.27 ± 13.10 years showed a mean total CCAS-S score of 88.18 ± 2.88 [18]. Considering the similar age of the patients in these three studies, CCAS might be most severe in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 patients. This may be because the cerebellum and brainstem is affected in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. Cognitive decline has been reported to occur even during the prodromal phase and is more pronounced in patients with severe motor activity in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 [19]. The median total CCAS-S score for our patients was 72, which is similar to that of the spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 patients described above. Considering that the SARA score was higher in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 patients than in our study, the similar total CCAS-S scores may be due to the advanced age of the patients.

In the above three studies, age- and sex-matched healthy participants were independently examined and compared with a patient group to determine which CCAS-S items were impaired. The spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 study revealed five failed items, including affect [16], and the spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 study found 10 failed items, including affect [17]. The chronic cerebellar stroke study found abnormalities in nine items, excluding affect [18]. In congruence, our study reported three failed items except for affect; degenerative diseases such as spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 and type 3 are more likely impair the affect item than cerebellar stroke. However, the use of independent healthy controls in each study may have introduced a bias; therefore, it would be desirable to establish a worldwide reference value for each age group.

The cerebellum is divided into 10 lobules based on the nomenclature introduced by Larsell [20], with lobules I–V as the anterior lobe, lobules VI–IX as the posterior lobe, and lobule X as the flocculonodular lobe. Lobule VII is further divided into lobules VIIa (crusts I and II) and VIIb. Previous studies have shown that the foci of CCAS are located in the posterior lobe (lobules VII and VIII, and mainly in the DN); specifically, in lobules VII and VIII for executive function, in VIIa and right lobule VIII for visuospatial cognition, and in the right VIIa and lobule IX for language function [21]. Other studies have indicated that the right posterolateral region is responsible for CCAS [18]. In the present study, the DN and lobes VI, VII, and VIII tended to be injured more frequently, supporting the results of previous studies.

The cerebrum and cerebellum are interconnected via neural networks. Strong connections have been established between the cerebellum and various regions including the prefrontal cortex, posterior parietal lobe, superior temporal lobe, and temporal lobe, indicating the cerebellar involvement in higher cognitive networks [22, 23]. The association between the cerebellum and brain can be categorized into motor and cognitive loop. In the context of CCAS, it is believed that the condition arises from a disruption in the cognitive loop, specifically involving the prefrontal cortex, bridge nucleus, cerebellar hemisphere/DN, and contralateral thalamus - dorsomedial nucleus of prefrontal cortex [24, 25]. A study reported that cerebellar lesions patients exhibited decreased cerebral blood flow and metabolism, particularly in premotor areas contralateral to the lesion [26]. Furthermore, a SPECT study revealed that, in cases where there was no damage to the brain regions under the tentorium, reduced blood flow in the contralateral medial frontal lobe resulting from a cerebellar lesion could potentially account for symptoms such as executive dysfunction, apathy, and impaired inhibition [27].

Although cognitive dysfunction and depression are known to affect outcomes after stroke [28–31], whether CCAS affects the outcomes of acute cerebellar stroke has not been examined. In our study, motor symptoms rather than CCAS were the factors affecting outcome; although CCAS was detected by the CCAS-S, the MMSE was normal in all patients, reflecting that cognitive impairment due to acute cerebellar stroke was not severe. In addition, studies of spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 and FRDA have reported an inverse association between CCAS-S and SARA. However, no significant correlation between CCAS-S and SARA was found in this study. This may be partly because, unlike patients with degenerative diseases, patients with cerebellar stroke experience only partial damage to the cerebellum.

There are a few limitations in this study. Firstly, the study was conducted at a single center and the number of patients was small. Secondly, the CCAS-S was administered in Japanese; thus, it could not be validated. Thirdly, the CCAS-S score of patients with acute cerebellar stroke was compared with healthy controls, as in previous studies.

Conclusions

Despite the high frequency of CCAS in acute cerebellar stroke patients, it did not affect the outcome. In addition, the CCAS-S was useful in patients with acute cerebellar infarction, as most patients with acute cerebellar infarction in the present study had clear CCAS. Future studies should be conducted on a larger scale to examine the relationship with other neuropsychological tests. And since this study was conducted during a short acute period, the long-term prognosis of CCAS should also be investigated.

Non-standard abbreviations and acronyms

Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS)

Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome-scale (CCAS-S)

Activities of daily life (ADL)

Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)

Functional Independence measure (FIM)

Barthel Index (BI)

Friedreich’s ataxia (FRDA)

Superior, Anterior inferior, and Posterior inferior cerebellar arteries (SCA, AICA, and PICA)

Sources of Funding

None.

Disclosures

None.

Conflict of interest

None.