Abstract
The pressing need for objective measures in the evaluation of chronic pain both in research and practice highlights the role that neuro information systems (NeuorIS) research plays in designing smart clinical decision support systems. A first step in such a research agenda is identifying practical stimuli-task paradigms that can reliably detect chronic pain from physiological measures such as eye movements. In this study, we propose and test a new stimuli-task paradigm. Our results show that our proposed stimuli-task paradigm can detect differences in information processing behavior of people with and without chronic pain. The results also show that our proposed stimuli-task paradigm can reliably predict a person’s reported subjective pain experience from his/her eye movements. These findings provide support for our proposed stimuli-task paradigm. They also show that the eye-tracking variables that we selected to test our proposed paradigm are effective in capturing the impact of chronic pain on visual attention and suggest that eye movements have the potential to serve as reliable biomarkers of chronic pain. In other words, our results provide support for the potential of eye movements to facilitate the development of smart information systems that can detect the presence and/or the severity of chronic pain from an individual’s ocular behavior.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of Worcester Polytechnic Institute gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work not available to share.
