Summary
Background Existing studies on contextual health effects struggle to account for selection bias, limiting causal interpretation. We use refugee dispersal in Germany as natural experiment to study the effect of small-area deprivation on mental and physical health, while considering the potential mediating role of housing and social context.
Methods Refugees subject to dispersal (n=1400) are selected from a nation-wide longitudinal refugee study (IAB-SOEP-BAMF Panel; 2016-2018). Multi-level linear regression models, adjusted for age, sex, education, region of origin, federal state, asylum status and length of residence in Germany, are fitted to the change in mental and physical health subscales of the SF-12 depending on quintiles (Q1 – Q5) of district-level socioeconomic deprivation (German Index of Socio-Economic Deprivation, GISD). This is followed by mediation analyses (for housing and social context) and sensitivity analyses.
Findings Residency in districts with moderate-high deprivation (Q4) has a negative impact on physical health (coef·: -2·2, 95%CI: -4·1;-0·2) compared to lowest deprivation (Q1). Moderate-high deprivation (Q4) also has a positive impact on mental health, but the effect is statistically insignificant following covariate adjustment (coef·: 2·5, 95%CI: -0·7;5·6). Comparisons with other deprivation quintiles are statistically insignificant.
Interpretation The results point to gaps in health and social service provision for refugees living in the most deprived regions. Further efforts should be made to support integration of refugees into health and social systems in resource-poor regions, including improved interpreting services, specifically trained social workers and diversity-sensitive information offerings. Further research using longer timeframes and larger sample sizes are required to confirm results.
Funding German Science Foundation (FOR: 2928/ GZ: BO5233/1-1).
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the German Science Foundation (DFG) in the scope of the NEXUS project as part of the PH-LENS Research Unit (FOR 2928 / GZ: BO 5233/1-1). The funder had no influence on the design of the study, analysis or decision to publish.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used ONLY openly available human data that can be requested via via soepmail{at}diw.de.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data of the Socioeconomic Panel is publicly available for individuals at research institutions subject to eligibility requirements and data sharing agreements. Requests can be made via soepmail{at}diw.de.
