Abstract
Background Repolarization alternans, defined as period-2 oscillation in the repolarization phase of the action potentials, provides a mechanistic link between cellular dynamics and ventricular fibrillation (VF). Theoretically, higher-order periodicities (e.g., periods 4, 6, 8,…) are expected but have minimal experimental evidence.
Methods We studied explanted human hearts obtained from recipients of heart transplantation at the time of surgery. Optical mapping of the transmembrane potential was performed after staining the hearts with voltage-sensitive fluorescent dyes. Hearts were stimulated at an increasing rate until VF was induced. Signals recorded from the right ventricle endocardial surface prior to induction of VF and in the presence of 1:1 conduction were processed using the Principal Component Analysis and a combinatorial algorithm to detect and quantify higher-order dynamics. Results were correlated to the underlying electrophysiological characteristics as quantified by restitution curves and conduction velocity.
Results A prominent and statistically significant global 1:4 peak (corresponding to period-4 dynamics) was seen in three of the six studied hearts. Local (pixel-wise) analysis revealed the spatially heterogeneous distribution of periods 4, 6, and 8, with the regional presence of periods greater than two in all the hearts. There was no significant correlation between the underlying restitution properties and the period of each pixel.
Discussion We present evidence of higher-order periodicities and the co-existence of such regions with stable non-chaotic areas in ex-vivo human hearts. We infer from the independence of the period to the underlying restitution properties that the oscillation of the excitation-contraction coupling and calcium cycling mechanisms is the primary mechanism of higher-order dynamics. These higher-order regions may act as niduses of instability that can degenerate into chaotic fibrillation and may provide targets for substrate-based ablation of VF.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was partly supported by the NIH under grant 1R01HL143450-01 and the NSF under CMMI-1762553.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was approved by the Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology Institutional Review Boards.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding This study was partly supported by the NIH under grant 1R01HL143450-01 and the NSF under CMMI-1762553.
Data Availability
The de-identified processed data products, analysis results, and software code are available upon request.
