Cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity among children and adolescents with diabetes: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

Hannah Steinman De Visser, Isaak Fast, Nicole Brunton, Edward Arevalo, Nicole Askin, Rasheda Rabbani, Ahmed M. Abou-Setta, Jonathan McGavock
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.18.23294290

Abstract

Background It is unclear if cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and physical activity (PA) are lower among youth with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) compared to youth without diabetes. The objective of this study was to describe the magnitude, precision and constancy of the differences in CRF and PA between youth with and without diabetes.

Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus from 2000 to May 2022 for cross sectional studies that included measures of CRF and PA in children and adolescents with and without T1D or T2D. The main outcomes were objectively measured CRF obtained from a graded maximal exercise test and subjective or objective measures of PA. Three reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed studies for bias. Random effects meta-analysis model was used to estimate differences in main outcomes. The pooled effect estimate was measured as standardized mean differences (SMD) with its 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022329303) and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline.

Results Of 7857 unique citations retrieved, we included 9 studies (n = 755 participants) with measures of CRF and 9 studies (n = 1233 participants) with measures of PA for youth with T2D, as well as 23 studies (n = 2082 participants) and 36 studies (n = 12,196 participants) for youth with T1D. Random effects models revealed that directly measured CRF was lower in youth with T2D [SMD = - 1.06; 95% CI: -1.57 to -0.56, I2=84%, n=9 studies; n=781 youth] and in youth with T1D compared to controls [SMD = -0.39; 95% CI: -0.70 to -0.09, I2=89%, n=22 studies; n=2082 youth]. Random effects models revealed that daily PA was marginally lower in youth with T1D [SMD= -0.29, 95% CI −0.46 to -0.11, I2=89%, n=32 studies; n = 12196 youth] but not different among youth with T2D compared to controls [SMD= -0.56, 95% CI −1.28 to +0.16, I2=91%, n=9 studies; n=1233 youth]. When analyses were restricted to studies with objective measures, PA was significantly lower in youth with T2D [SMD -0.71, 95% CI −1.36 to -0.05; I2=23%, n=3 studies; n=332 youth] and T1D [SMD -0.67, 95% CI –1.17 to -0.17; I2=93%; n=12 studies; n=1357 youth] compared to controls.

Conclusions Children and adolescents living with T1D and T2D display lower CRF and objectively measured PA compared to controls without diabetes. Deficits in CRF, but not PA are larger and more consistent in youth with T2D, compared to youth with T1D. These data may contribute to the increased risk for cardiovascular disease-related morbidity observed in adolescents with diabetes, particularly those with T2D.

Funding This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research

INTRODUCTION

Cardiorespiratory fitness1,2 and daily physical activity3,4 are important modifiable determinants of pediatric and adult cardiometabolic disease, including mortality5. Adolescents with high cardiorespiratory fitness6,7 and those that engage in regular daily physical activity3,4 display lower blood pressure, lower central and overall obesity and are less likely to develop cardiovascular disease-related morbidity in adulthood. Accordingly, engaging in regular physical activity8,9, and by extension, increasing cardiorespiratory fitness10 are consistent recommendations for optimal growth and health for children and adolescents, including those living with diabetes11–15.

Current clinical practice and expert guidelines argue that children and adolescents (referred to herein as youth) with type 1 and type 2 diabetes are less active and have lower cardiorespiratory fitness than their peers without diabetes11–15. Despite these claims, the evidence is mixed. Some studies have documented large deficits in physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness in youth with type 2 diabetes16 while others suggest differences are less profound17. Among youth with type 1 diabetes, some studies found lower levels of physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness18, while many suggest no difference19 and in some cases, higher levels of physical activity20. In the absence of a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies, the consistency, magnitude and precision of these differences remain unclear. More accurate estimates of the differences in physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness among youth living with chronic diseases is a priority among researchers in this area21 and the magnitude of these differences could help tailor behavioural interventions to improve health outcomes for youth living with diabetes.

To address these gaps in pediatric diabetes, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to answer the following questions: Are cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity lower among youth with diabetes compared to youth without diabetes? What is the overall quality of studies that describe differences in cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity among youth with diabetes and controls without diabetes?

METHODS

Data sources, search strategy, and eligibility criteria

This review was conducted according to the Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Reviews and reported according to the PRISMA guidelines22. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost). Controlled vocabulary and free text terms were utilized. A search for cross sectional and cohort studies was conducted from January 1, 2000 to May 1, 2022 (Supplementary eTables 1). The systematic review followed a priori eligibility criteria and the protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD:42022329303). Institutional ethics approval was not required for this systematic review and meta-analysis as individual-level data were not used for this analysis.

Study inclusion criteria

We included cross sectional and cohort studies that compared measures of cardiorespiratory fitness or physical activity between youth with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes and controls without diabetes. The inclusion criteria for data extraction and meta-analyses were: studies of youth aged 0 to 18yrs of age, cases of youth with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes, a comparison group without diabetes, published estimates of differences and variance for physical activity or cardiorespiratory fitness between youth with diabetes and controls without diabetes. We excluded experimental studies, studies that included data from adults (over the age of 18), studies that compared youth with type 1 and type 2 diabetes directly without a comparison group without diabetes, and studies published in languages other than English.

Classification of diabetes-types

We applied definitions established by Diabetes Canada23 and the American Diabetes Association24 to define type 2 diabetes and type 1 diabetes in youth.

Study selection

Abstracts and titles of relevant citations were independently screened by three reviewers (HSD, EA, IF) to determine eligibility. Prior to the full screen, a preliminary screen of 30 titles and abstracts was conducted to determine a preliminary agreement rating. As the preliminary agreement rate was adequate (28/30 abstracts were in agreement), the same reviewers independently screened all remaining titles and abstracts. Two reviewers (HSD, IF) independently assessed the eligibility of full-text articles of citations using a standardized pre-piloted form outlining the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Disagreements were resolved by consensus or with the involvement of a third reviewer (JMc).

Data extraction

Data were extracted independently by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved by consensus or with the involvement of a third reviewer. Two authors extracted data for study population demographics (age, sex, weight status, ethnicity, duration of diabetes, ethnicity, socio-economic status) and outcome measures. We also created binary variables for the methods used to collect physical activity (objective vs subjective) and cardiorespiratory fitness (field vs lab) and within the measure of cardiorespiratory fitness whether the tests were maximal or sub-maximal. Objective methods included pedometer or accelerometer-based quantification of daily physical activity, while subjective methods included a range of self-reported tools. Lab-based methods to quantify cardiorespiratory fitness included graded maximal tests to exhaustion and sub-maximal tests with measured rates of oxygen consumption. Field tests of cardiorespiratory fitness included graded maximal tests to exhaustion (i.e. shuttle run tests) that reported predicted peak rates of oxygen consumption or time to exhaustion.

Outcome and subgroup analyses

Cardiorespiratory fitness was reported as the maximal rate of oxygen consumption relative to body weight (mL/kg/min) or fat free mass mass (ml/kg-FFM/min) or time to exhaustion at the end of a graded maximal exercise test. Physical activity was reported as minutes of physical activity per day, minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity per day, METS, MET-mins and MET-hours per week. As there was significant heterogeneity for the methods and reporting of both cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity, we used the J correction factor for an unbiased estimate of the standard mean difference (SMD) between youth with and without diabetes25.

Risk of bias assessment

We evaluated the internal validity of included studies using a modified version of a risk of bias tool used in a previous meta-analysis of cross sectional studies of physical activity for youth living with chronic diseases19 (Appendix eTable 1). This risk of bias tool consists of several domains specific to measurements of physical activity: type of measurement (objective vs subjective), time of year for data collection, data collection and reduction of physical activity data, and criteria used to define a valid file for physical activity data. We also included several domains specific to the design of cross-sectional studies including a description of the sampling recruitment for cases and controls, eligibility criteria for controls, identifying and matching for potential sources of confounding, sex disaggregated analyses, and reporting of and matching for ethnicity. For studies of cardiorespiratory fitness, we also included a domain for reporting criteria for determining if a maximal effort was achieved and a score for the overall risk of bias. Each domain was judged as yes or no and given a score of 1 or 0 for the presence or absence of each potential source of bias. The overall risk of bias score was based on the responses to individual domains.

Statistical analyses

The primary outcomes for the meta-analyses were standardized mean differences in physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness. When at least 2 studies of similar populations, methods, and outcomes were available, inverse-variance weighted random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) between youth with and without diabetes. We initially calculated standardized mean differences with 95% CI for all studies that met inclusion criteria. Absolute mean differences with 95% CI were calculated for differences in the main outcomes for sub-group analyses of studies that used identical tools to quantify outcome measures between youth with and without diabetes. The range of differences and the inconsistency index (I2) were both used to quantify heterogeneity among studies25,26. Subgroup analyses were performed to determine if differences in outcomes were influenced by: (A) the methods used to assess the main outcomes of interest (direct vs indirect measures for cardiorespiratory fitness and subjective vs objective measures for physical activity), and (B) the type of control population studied (healthy weight vs weight matched). We also performed sensitivity analyses by removing extreme outliers. Funnel plots were used to investigate publication bias with the Egger test and visual inspection to assess plot asymmetry for all four meta-analyses. The meta-analyses were conducted using the general meta and metafor package27 in RStudio version 2022.07.2+576, R version 4.2.2 (R Project for Statistical Computing).

RESULTS

After systemic searches of each database, 7857 unique individual citations were included in a preliminary screen. At the end of the title and abstract screening, 7400 papers were excluded, 52 were included, and 405 were in conflict across the three reviewers. There was a 94.8% agreement rate between the reviewers for the title and abstract screen. The 405 papers with conflicting scores were resolved by the 3 screeners and one investigator (JMc) to determine consensus for eligibility for full paper screening and data extraction (see eTables 2 and 3 for references). After all the conflicts were resolved, 130 papers were included for the full paper screen and 55 studies were included for data extraction1,5,6,16–18,20,28–77 (eFigure 1 appendix). Details for each individual study are presented in eTables 2 through 5 of the appendix.

For studies of pediatric type 2 diabetes, most studies of physical activity (8/9) and cardiorespiratory fitness (8/9) were performed exclusively with adolescents. Among studies of cardiorespiratory fitness among youth with type 2 diabetes, the proportion of female participants was 56.19% for cases and 59.13% for controls, the median age was 15.3 years for cases (range: 12.9, 16.4 years) and 15.1 years for controls (range: 12.5, 16.2 years), and all participants were obese. Only 6 of 10 studies included information about the ethnicity of their participants (eTable 6 of the appendix).

For studies of physical activity among youth with type 2 diabetes, the proportion of females was 68.1% for cases and 58.7% for controls. The median age was 15.2 years (range: 12.9, 16.4) for cases and 14.8 years for controls (range: 12.5, 16), and all participants were obese. For the studies of pediatric type 2 diabetes that reported physical activity, 7 of the 9 studies included information about the ethnicity of their participants (eTable 6 of the appendix).

For studies of youth with type 1 diabetes, most studies of cardiorespiratory fitness (n = 17/23; 73.9%) and physical activity (n=24/36; 66.7%) were performed in adolescents. The proportion of female participants was 45.7% in cases and 49.7% in controls for studies of cardiorespiratory fitness and 51.6% in cases and 50.7% in controls for studies the reported physical activity. The median age was 14.1 years (range: 10.5 to 16.2 years) for cases and 13.6 years (range: 10.1 to 16.0 years) for controls in studies of cardiorespiratory fitness and 14.0 years (range: 7.4 to 16.0 years) for cases and 13.6 years (range: 7.3 to 16.3 years) for controls for studies of physical activity. The distribution of ethnicity for the studies that reported it is provided in eTable 7 of the appendix.

Among the 55 studies included in data extraction, 9 studies (n = 755 participants; 286 cases) met the eligibility criteria for the outcome of cardiorespiratory fitness for youth with type 2 diabetes and 22 studies (38 unique comparisons; n = 2082 participants; 1018 cases) met the eligibility criteria for the outcome of cardiorespiratory fitness for youth with type 1 diabetes. Mean VO2peak values from lab-based studies was 20.7 ± 3.5 ml/kg/min for youth with type 2 diabetes and 36.9 ± 5.3 ml/kg/min for youth with type 1 diabetes (Figure 1). The random-effects meta-analysis revealed that youth with type 2 diabetes displayed significantly lower cardiorespiratory fitness relative to controls without diabetes [SMD = -1.06; 95%CI: -1.57 to -0.56, I2=84%, n=9 studies; n=755 youth] (Figure 2A). When data were restricted to studies with lab-based measures of VO2peak, youth with type 2 diabetes displayed significantly lower cardiorespiratory fitness compared to controls without diabetes [MD= -8.76 ml/kg/min, 95% CI: -12.7 to -4.9; I2 = 82%; 8 studies; n= 575 participants].

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Differences in VO2peak between youth without diabetes compared to youth with type 1 and type 2 diabetes
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Differences in cardiorespiratory fitness between youth with diabetes and controls

The random-effect meta-analysis revealed cardiorespiratory fitness was also lower in youth with type 1 diabetes compared to controls without diabetes [SMD = -0.39; 95% CI: -0.70 to -0.09, I2=89%; n= 23 studies; n=2082 participants; 1018 cases] (Figure 2B). Restricting the analysis to lab-based measures of cardiorespiratory fitness did not influence the estimate of the difference between youth with type 1 diabetes and controls without diabetes [MD: -3.9 ml/kg/min; 95% CI: -6.3 to -1.6 ml/kg/min; I2 = 68%; n=13 studies; n = 917 participants]. Subgroup analyses of studies of youth with type 2 diabetes revealed that the differences in cardiorespiratory fitness were lower when controls without diabetes were obese [SMD = -0.75; 95% CI:-1.15 to -0.35; I2 = 77%; n=8 studies; n= 593], compared to studies with controls that were healthy weight [SMD = -2.10 ; 95% CI: -2.74 to -1.47; I2 = 77%; n = 7 studies; n= 328]. Subgroup analyses restricted to health weight youth with type 1 diabetes, revealed that cardiorespiratory fitness was lower compared to healthy weight controls without diabetes [SMD = -0.75; 95% CI: -1.09 to -0.41; I2 = 86%; n = 15 studies; n= 1295 participants]. Only 2 studies were performed in youth with type 1 diabetes that were obese and no differences in cardiorespiratory fitness were observed relative to controls without diabetes.

Of the 55 studies that met eligibility for data extraction, 9 studies (10 unique comparisons; n = 1233 participants) met eligibility for the outcome of physical activity for youth with type 2 diabetes and 36 studies (n = 12,196 participants) met eligibility for the outcome of physical activity for youth with type 1 diabetes. Random effects models revealed that daily physical activity was not different among youth with type 2 diabetes [SMD= -0.56, 95% CI –1.28 to +0.16, I2=91%] (Figure 3A) studies compared to controls without diabetes, but was marginally lower among youth with type 1 diabetes [SMD= -0.29, 95% CI –0.46 to -0.11; I2 = 89%] (Figure 3B) compared to controls without diabetes. Analyses restricted to studies with objective measures found that physical activity was lower in youth with type 2 diabetes [SMD -0.71, 95% CI –1.36 to -0.05; I2 = 23%; n=3 studies; n=332] and type 1 diabetes [SMD -0.67, 95% CI –1.17 to -0.17; I2 = 93%; n=12 studies; n=1357] relative to controls without diabetes (eFigures 2 and 3).

Figure 3.
Figure 3. Differences in daily physical activity between youth with diabetes and controls

The distribution of bias for studies of cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity among youth with type 2 diabetes and type 1 diabetes are summarized in Table 2. For all studies combined, 80-89% of studies provided information on the recruitment process for the comparison population. Only 22-36% of studies described the timing of the measurements of physical activity, 20-39% of studies described methods to address potential sources of bias or strategies to address confounding and 0 to 22% presented sex disaggregated data. For studies of youth with type 2 diabetes, the majority (n=8/9) relied on lab-based measures of cardiorespiratory fitness. For studies of physical activity among youth with type 2 diabetes, only 3/9 studies used objective measures and none of the studies provided definitions for a valid assessment of physical activity or described the season during which data were collected. For studies of cardiorespiratory fitness among youth with type 1 diabetes, the majority relied on laboratory-based maximal tests to exhaustion (21/23) but few reported criteria for achieving maximal exertion. For studies of physical activity among youth with type 1 diabetes, 13/36 used objective measures and 61% provided definitions for a valid assessment of physical activity. Funnel plots revealed no publication bias for the four meta-analyses presented above (eFigures 4 through 7).

View this table:
Table 1. Details for the studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis
View this table:
Table 2. Risk of score summary scores across different populations and outcomes.

DISCUSSION

The main finding from this systematic review and meta-analysis was that youth with type 2 diabetes have very low cardiorespiratory fitness, with values ∼25-50% lower than age-matched controls without diabetes and modestly lower daily physical activity. The mean VO2peak for youth with type 2 diabetes, ∼20 ml/kg/min, is well below normative values for adolescents and established thresholds for optimal cardiometabolic risk profiles. Among youth with type 1 diabetes, both cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity are modestly lower compared to age-matched peers without diabetes. The differences in physical activity between adolescents with diabetes and controls, are more evident when objective measures are used to quantify physical activity. Lastly, these estimates are at risk of bias due to significant limitations in study designs and reporting, that likely contributes to the high heterogeneity of effect sizes across studies.

Low cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with increased cardiometabolic risk factor clustering in adolescence and cardiovascular disease-related morbidity in adulthood2,10,78,79. The average VO2peak derived from direct lab-based measures for youth with type 2 diabetes was 20.6 ml/kg/min, a value ∼50% lower than healthy weight controls without diabetes. In contrast, adolescents with type 1 diabetes displayed a mean VO2peak value of 36.9 ml/kg/min and a value ∼10% lower than controls without diabetes. These levels of cardiorespiratory fitness for youth with type 2 diabetes are well below mean values for representative samples of adolescents in the US (46.4 ± 0.4 ml/kg/min for boys; 38.7 ± 0.3 ml/kg/min for girls)80; Canada (50.1 ml/kg/min, 95%CI: 48.1-52.0 ml/kg/min for boys; 42.0 ml/kg/min, 95% CI: 41.2-42.7 ml/kg/min for girls)81 and Europe82, and below the minimal threshold at which the odds of cardiometabolic risk factor clustering increase 2-4 fold (<41.6 ml/kg/min for boys; <34.6 ml/kg/min for girls)2. These deficits in cardiorespiratory fitness in youth living with diabetes may therefore contribute partially to the cardiovascular disease risk factor clustering reported in adolescence28 and excessive cardiovascular disease-related morbidity observed in young adulthood83. These data also support clinical practice guidelines and expert opinions that cardiorespiratory fitness is impaired in youth with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Engaging in daily physical activity is a cornerstone in the management of pediatric diabetes11–15. Despite the widely recognized benefits of physical activity, very few systematic reviews with meta-analyses have been published describing daily physical activity levels in youth living with diabetes. One meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies of adolescents with chronic diseases found no difference in moderate to vigorous physical activity among youth with type 1 diabetes, relative to a comparison population17. With an additional 5 studies of adolescents with type 1 diabetes that wore a device to quantify physical activity objectively, we found a very small difference in daily physical activity among youth with type 1 diabetes, relative to peers without diabetes. Fewer studies have documented levels of daily physical activity among youth with type 2 diabetes, however they consistently reveal very low levels of daily physical activity, relative to expert recommendations (∼7000 steps/day and ∼35 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity daily)17,84–86. Compared to youth without diabetes, the differences in daily physical activity were greater for youth with type 2 diabetes, compared to youth with type 1 diabetes. The large deficits in daily physical activity among youth with type 2 diabetes may contribute to the lower cardiorespiratory fitness reported here, reinforcing the need for novel approaches to support physical activity behaviours for adolescents with type 2 diabetes.

An important observation from the current systematic review was the significant risk of bias observed in most studies published to date. Specifically, few studies adequately report sampling strategies for recruiting cases and controls, they also consistently fail to use objective methods to quantify daily physical activity and rarely adhere to reporting guidelines when they are used. Additionally, despite calls for reporting sex- and ethnicity specific outcomes, there are limited data describing sex-specific or ethnicity specific differences in daily physical activity or cardiorespiratory fitness for youth living with diabetes. Well designed, properly controlled, descriptive epidemiological studies that describe differences in physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness among for boys and girls living with diabetes, and across various racial and ethnic groups are needed to overcome these limitations.

Limitations

The current systematic review is the largest and most comprehensive description of cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity levels among youth living with diabetes to date. Although we applied strict criteria for study inclusion and published the methods a-priori, there are several limitations of the review to consider. First, the quality of a meta-analysis is dependent on the quality of studies included. As previously mentioned, the risk of bias was high in most studies, therefore the estimates provided here should be interpreted with caution. The external validity or transferability of the results is also limited by several factors, including failure to report race and ethnicity, socio-economic status and in most cases sex-specific differences in cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity within each population. Structural factors that influence access, safety and participation in physical activity are important when studying differences in physical activity for Indigenous youth, youth of colour, new immigrants, girls and non-binary youth. Type 2 diabetes is more common among Indigenous, Black and Hispanic youth24–26 and those living in low income households27, however we were unable to describe disparities in cardiorespiratory fitness or physical activity across ethnicity, socio-economic position, sex or gender due to a lack of information for these demographic variables in the majority of studies published to date. Lastly, we did not include non-English publications or studies in the grey literature to increase feasibility of the review and this may have introduced selective reporting bias (e.g. publication bias).

In conclusion, youth living with type 2 diabetes display profoundly lower cardiorespiratory fitness and modestly lower daily physical activity compared to peers without diabetes. Deficits in cardiorespiratory fitness and daily physical activity are also evident, but less pronounced, among youth with type 1 diabetes. Studies of cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity and among youth with diabetes suffer from significant design issues that increase the risk that these estimates are biased. Deficits in physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness may contribute to the increased burden of cardiovascular disease morbidity in young adulthood in individuals diagnosed with diabetes in childhood or adolescents. These findings reinforce calls for novel interventions to empower youth living with diabetes to engage in regular physical activity and improve cardiorespiratory fitness.

Data Availability

Data will be made available upon request.

Sources of funding

Funding for this project was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Applied Public Health Chair and Obesity (CPP-137910) and the DREAM Theme at the Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba. Funders did not have any role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and were not involved in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Financial Disclosure

The authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. Drs. McGavock receives operating support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Diabetes Action Canada, Diabetes Canada and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation. The funding agencies had no role in the study design, conduct of a systematic review and meta-analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript.

Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

Acknowledgments

Drs McGavock, Rabbani and Abou-Setta had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Abbreviations

T2D
type 2 diabetes
T1D
type 1 diabetes
CRF
cardiorespiratory fitness
PA
physical activity

References

  1. 1.↵
    Garcia-Hermoso A, Ramirez-Velez R, Garcia-Alonso Y, Alonso-Martinez AM, Izquierdo M. Association of Cardiorespiratory Fitness Levels During Youth With Health Risk Later in Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174:952–960. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.2400
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    Ruiz JR, Cavero-Redondo I, Ortega FB, Welk GJ, Andersen LB, Martinez-Vizcaino V. Cardiorespiratory fitness cut points to avoid cardiovascular disease risk in children and adolescents; what level of fitness should raise a red flag? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:1451–1458. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095903
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Ekelund U, Luan J, Sherar LB, Esliger DW, Griew P, Cooper A, International Children’s Accelerometry Database C. Moderate to vigorous physical activity and sedentary time and cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents. JAMA. 2012;307:704–712. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.156
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Hay J, Maximova K, Durksen A, Carson V, Rinaldi RL, Torrance B, Ball GD, Majumdar SR, Plotnikoff RC, Veugelers P, et al. Physical activity intensity and cardiometabolic risk in youth. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166:1022–1029. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1028
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Hogstrom G, Nordstrom A, Nordstrom P. Aerobic fitness in late adolescence and the risk of early death: a prospective cohort study of 1.3 million Swedish men. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45:1159–1168. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv321
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Hurtig-Wennlof A, Ruiz JR, Harro M, Sjostrom M. Cardiorespiratory fitness relates more strongly than physical activity to cardiovascular disease risk factors in healthy children and adolescents: the European Youth Heart Study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007;14:575–581. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32808c67e3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    McGavock JM, Torrance BD, McGuire KA, Wozny PD, Lewanczuk RZ. Cardiorespiratory fitness and the risk of overweight in youth: the Healthy Hearts Longitudinal Study of Cardiometabolic Health. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17:1802–1807. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.59
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Chaput JP, Willumsen J, Bull F, Chou R, Ekelund U, Firth J, Jago R, Ortega FB, Katzmarzyk PT. 2020 WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for children and adolescents aged 5-17 years: summary of the evidence. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17:141. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01037-z
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    van Sluijs EMF, Ekelund U, Crochemore-Silva I, Guthold R, Ha A, Lubans D, Oyeyemi AL, Ding D, Katzmarzyk PT. Physical activity behaviours in adolescence: current evidence and opportunities for intervention. Lancet. 2021;398:429–442. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01259-9
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    Raghuveer G, Hartz J, Lubans DR, Takken T, Wiltz JL, Mietus-Snyder M, Perak AM, Baker-Smith C, Pietris N, Edwards NM, et al. Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Youth: An Important Marker of Health: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;142:e101–e118. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000866
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    Adolfsson P, Riddell MC, Taplin CE, Davis EA, Fournier PA, Annan F, Scaramuzza AE, Hasnani D, Hofer SE. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Exercise in children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19 Suppl 27:205–226. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12755
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.
    Adolfsson P, Taplin CE, Zaharieva DP, Pemberton J, Davis EA, Riddell MC, McGavock J, Moser O, Szadkowska A, Lopez P, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Exercise in children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022;23:1341–1372. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13452
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.
    Colberg SR, Sigal RJ, Yardley JE, Riddell MC, Dunstan DW, Dempsey PC, Horton ES, Castorino K, Tate DF. Physical Activity/Exercise and Diabetes: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:2065–2079. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1728
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.
    Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert C, Sigal RJ, Armstrong MJ, Bacon SL, Boule NG, Dasgupta K, Kenny GP, Riddell MC. Physical Activity and Diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2018;42 Suppl 1:S54–S63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.008
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    Maahs DM, Daniels SR, de Ferranti SD, Dichek HL, Flynn J, Goldstein BI, Kelly AS, Nadeau KJ, Martyn-Nemeth P, Osganian SK, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk factors in youth with diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;130:1532–1558. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000094
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Nadeau KJ, Zeitler PS, Bauer TA, Brown MS, Dorosz JL, Draznin B, Reusch JE, Regensteiner JG. Insulin resistance in adolescents with type 2 diabetes is associated with impaired exercise capacity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:3687–3695. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2844
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Wittmeier KD, Wicklow BA, MacIntosh AC, Sellers EA, Ryner LN, Serrai H, Gardiner PF, Dean HJ, McGavock JM. Hepatic steatosis and low cardiorespiratory fitness in youth with type 2 diabetes. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20:1034–1040. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.379
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Nguyen T, Obeid J, Walker RG, Krause MP, Hawke TJ, McAssey K, Vandermeulen J, Timmons BW. Fitness and physical activity in youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus in good or poor glycemic control. Pediatr Diabetes. 2015;16:48–57. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12117
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Elmesmari R, Reilly JJ, Martin A, Paton JY. Accelerometer measured levels of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity and sedentary time in children and adolescents with chronic disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0179429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179429
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Czenczek-Lewandowska E, Leszczak J, Baran J, Weres A, Wyszynska J, Lewandowski B, Dabrowski M, Mazur A. Levels of Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes in Relation to the Healthy Comparators and to the Method of Insulin Therapy Used. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183498
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    Lang JJ, Zhang K, Agostinis-Sobrinho C, Andersen LB, Basterfield L, Berglind D, Blain DO, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Cameron C, Carson V, et al. Top 10 International Priorities for Physical Fitness Research and Surveillance Among Children and Adolescents: A Twin-Panel Delphi Study. Sports Med. 2022:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01752-6
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert C, Panagiotopoulos C, Hadjiyannakis S, Henderson M. Type 2 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents. Can J Diabetes. 2018;42 Suppl 1:S247–S254. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.037
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    American Diabetes A. 13. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44:S180–S199. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S013
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Borenstein M, Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
  26. 26.↵
    Borenstein M, Higgins JP, Hedges LV, Rothstein HR. Basics of meta-analysis: I(2) is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity. Res Synth Methods. 2017;8:5–18. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1230
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Harrer M, Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T.A., & Ebert, D.D.. Doing Meta-Analysis with R: A Hands-On Guide. Boca Raton, FL Chapmann & Hall/CRC Press; 2021.
  28. 28.↵
    Alman AC, Talton JW, Wadwa RP, Urbina EM, Dolan LM, Daniels SR, Hamman RF, D’Agostino RB, Marcovina SM, Mayer-Davis EJ, et al. Cardiovascular health in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: the SEARCH CVD study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2014;15:502–510. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12120
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.
    Bener A, Alsaied A, Al-Ali M, Al-Kubaisi A, Basha B, Abraham A, Guiter G, Mian M. High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in type 1 diabetes mellitus and healthy children. Acta Diabetol. 2009;46:183–189. doi: 10.1007/s00592-008-0071-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.
    Bishop FK, Wadwa RP, Snell-Bergeon J, Nguyen N, Maahs DM. Changes in diet and physical activity in adolescents with and without type 1 diabetes over time. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol. 2014;2014:17. doi: 10.1186/1687-9856-2014-17
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.
    Bjornstad P, Cree-Green M, Baumgartner A, Maahs DM, Cherney DZ, Pyle L, Regensteiner JG, Reusch JE, Nadeau KJ. Renal function is associated with peak exercise capacity in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:126–131. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1742
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.
    Bjornstad P, Truong U, Dorosz JL, Cree-Green M, Baumgartner A, Coe G, Pyle L, Regensteiner JG, Reusch JE, Nadeau KJ. Cardiopulmonary Dysfunction and Adiponectin in Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e002804. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002804
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.
    Caferoglu Z, Inanc N, Hatipoglu N, Kurtoglu S. Health-Related Quality of Life and Metabolic Control in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2016;8:67–73. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.2051
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.
    Cohen M, Yaseen H, Khamaisi M, Gendelman R, Zuckerman-Levin N, Shilo S, Ilivitzki A, Weiss R, Shehadeh N. Endothelin-1 levels are decreased in pediatric Type 1 diabetes and negatively correlate with the carotid intima media thickness. Pediatr Diabetes. 2021;22:916–923. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13237
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. 35.
    Correa de Jesus I, Mascarenhas, LPG., de Lima, VA., Decimo, JP., Nesi-Franca, S., Leite, L. Maximal fat oxidation during aerobic exercise in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2019;25:299–304.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.
    Cuenca-Garcia M, Jago R, Shield JP, Burren CP. How does physical activity and fitness influence glycaemic control in young people with Type 1 diabetes? Diabet Med. 2012;29:e369–376. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03740.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.
    de Lima VA, Mascarenhas LPG, Decimo JP, de Souza WC, Monteiro ALS, Lahart I, Franca SN, Leite N. Physical Activity Levels of Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Physical Activity in T1D. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2017;29:213–219. doi: 10.1123/pes.2016-0199
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. 38.
    Dos Santos Haber JF, Chagas EFB, Barbalho SM, Sgarbi JA, Haber RSA, de Labio RW, Payao SLM. Level of physical activity and gene expression of IL-10 and TNF-alpha in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2022;36:108104. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2021.108104
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 39.
    Elmesmari RA, Reilly JJ, Paton JY. 24-Hour Movement Behaviors in Children with Chronic Disease and Their Healthy Peers: A Case-Control Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052912
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. 40.
    Fainardi V, Scarabello C, Cangelosi A, Fanciullo L, Mastrorilli C, Giannini C, Mohn A, Iafusco D, La Loggia A, Lombardo F, et al. Physical activity and sedentary lifestyle in children with type 1 diabetes: a multicentre Italian study. Acta Biomed. 2011;82:124–131.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.
    Faulkner MS, Michaliszyn SF, Hepworth JT, Wheeler MD. Personalized exercise for adolescents with diabetes or obesity. Biol Res Nurs. 2014;16:46–54. doi: 10.1177/1099800413500064
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.
    Galassetti PR, Iwanaga K, Crisostomo M, Zaldivar FP, Larson J, Pescatello A. Inflammatory cytokine, growth factor and counterregulatory responses to exercise in children with type 1 diabetes and healthy controls. Pediatr Diabetes. 2006;7:16–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-543X.2006.00140.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.
    Gusso S, Hofman P, Lalande S, Cutfield W, Robinson E, Baldi JC. Impaired stroke volume and aerobic capacity in female adolescents with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2008;51:1317–1320. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-1012-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.
    Hensel KO, Grimmer F, Roskopf M, Jenke AC, Wirth S, Heusch A. Subclinical Alterations of Cardiac Mechanics Present Early in the Course of Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Blinded Speckle Tracking Stress Echocardiography Study. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:2583747. doi: 10.1155/2016/2583747
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. 45.
    Heyman E, Briard D, Gratas-Delamarche A, Delamarche P, De Kerdanet M. Normal physical working capacity in prepubertal children with type 1 diabetes compared with healthy controls. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94:1389–1394. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb01809.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.
    Hodges SK, Teague AM, Dasari PS, Short KR. Effect of obesity and type 2 diabetes, and glucose ingestion on circulating spexin concentration in adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19:212–216. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12549
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. 47.
    Jahn LA, Logan B, Love KM, Horton WB, Eichner NZ, Hartline LM, Weltman AL, Barrett EJ. Nitric oxide-dependent micro- and macrovascular dysfunction occurs early in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2022;322:E101–E108. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00267.2021
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. 48.
    Jegdic V, Roncevic Z, Skrabic V. Physical fitness in children with type 1 diabetes measured with six-minute walk test. Int J Endocrinol. 2013;2013:190454. doi: 10.1155/2013/190454
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. 49.
    Joseph TV, Caksa S, Misra M, Mitchell DM. Hip Structural Analysis Reveals Impaired Hip Geometry in Girls With Type 1 Diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105:e4848–4856. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa647
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.
    Komatsu WR, Gabbay MA, Castro ML, Saraiva GL, Chacra AR, de Barros Neto TL, Dib SA. Aerobic exercise capacity in normal adolescents and those with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Pediatr Diabetes. 2005;6:145–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-543X.2005.00120.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.
    Kummer S, Stahl-Pehe A, Castillo K, Bachle C, Graf C, Strassburger K, Salgin B, Mayatepek E, Giani G, Holl RW, et al. Health behaviour in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes compared to a representative reference population. PLoS One. 2014;9:e112083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112083
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. 52.
    Lobelo F, Liese AD, Liu J, Mayer-Davis EJ, D’Agostino RB, Jr., Pate RR, Hamman RF, Dabelea D. Physical activity and electronic media use in the SEARCH for diabetes in youth case-control study. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e1364–1371. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1598
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.
    Lukacs A, Mayer K, Juhasz E, Varga B, Fodor B, Barkai L. Reduced physical fitness in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012;13:432–437. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2012.00848.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.
    Lukacs A, Sasvari P, Torok A, Barkai L. Generic and disease-specific quality of life in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: comparison to age-matched healthy peers. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2016;29:769–775. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2015-0397
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. 55.
    Maggio AB, Hofer MF, Martin XE, Marchand LM, Beghetti M, Farpour-Lambert NJ. Reduced physical activity level and cardiorespiratory fitness in children with chronic diseases. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169:1187–1193. doi: 10.1007/s00431-010-1199-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.
    Marshall ZA, Mackintosh KA, Lewis MJ, Ellins EA, McNarry MA. Association of physical activity metrics with indicators of cardiovascular function and control in children with and without type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2021;22:320–328. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13159
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. 57.
    Massin MM, Lebrethon MC, Rocour D, Gerard P, Bourguignon JP. Patterns of physical activity determined by heart rate monitoring among diabetic children. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90:1223–1226. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.075283
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.
    Miranda-Lora AL, Vilchis-Gil J, Juarez-Comboni DB, Cruz M, Klunder-Klunder M. A Genetic Risk Score Improves the Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Mexican Youths but Has Lower Predictive Utility Compared With Non-Genetic Factors. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:647864. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.647864
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  59. 59.
    Mohammed J, Deda L, Clarson CL, Stein RI, Cuerden MS, Mahmud FH. Assessment of habitual physical activity in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2014;38:250–255. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.05.010
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  60. 60.
    Moussa MA, Alsaeid M, Abdella N, Refai TM, Al-Sheikh N, Gomez JE. Social and psychological characteristics of Kuwaiti children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1835–1844. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.018
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. 61.
    Mutlu EK, Mutlu C, Taskiran H, Ozgen IT. Association of physical activity level with depression, anxiety, and quality of life in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2015;28:1273–1278. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2015-0082
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. 62.
    Nadeau KJ, Regensteiner JG, Bauer TA, Brown MS, Dorosz JL, Hull A, Zeitler P, Draznin B, Reusch JE. Insulin resistance in adolescents with type 1 diabetes and its relationship to cardiovascular function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:513–521. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1756
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.
    O’Neill JR, Liese AD, McKeown RE, Cai B, Cuffe SP, Mayer-Davis EJ, Hamman RF, Dabelea D. Physical activity and self-concept: the SEARCH for diabetes in youth case control study. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2012;24:577–588. doi: 10.1123/pes.24.4.577
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. 64.
    Riddell MC, Bar-Or O, Gerstein HC, Heigenhauser GJ. Perceived exertion with glucose ingestion in adolescent males with IDDM. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:167–173. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200001000-00025
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. 65.
    Riddell MC, Bar-Or O, Hollidge-Horvat M, Schwarcz HP, Heigenhauser GJ. Glucose ingestion and substrate utilization during exercise in boys with IDDM. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000;88:1239–1246. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.4.1239
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. 66.
    Rosa JS, Schwindt CD, Oliver SR, Leu SY, Flores RL, Galassetti PR. Exercise leukocyte profiles in healthy, type 1 diabetic, overweight, and asthmatic children. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2009;21:19–33. doi: 10.1123/pes.21.1.19
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. 67.
    Sarnblad S, Ekelund U, Aman J. Physical activity and energy intake in adolescent girls with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2005;22:893–899. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01544.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  68. 68.
    Shaibi GQ, Faulkner MS, Weigensberg MJ, Fritschi C, Goran MI. Cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity in youth with type 2 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2008;9:460–463. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00407.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. 69.
    Tommerdahl KL, Baumgartner K, Schafer M, Bjornstad P, Melena I, Hegemann S, Baumgartner AD, Pyle L, Cree-Green M, Truong U, et al. Impact of Obesity on Measures of Cardiovascular and Kidney Health in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes as Compared With Youth With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2021;44:795–803. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1879
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. 70.
    Trigona B, Aggoun Y, Maggio A, Martin XE, Marchand LM, Beghetti M, Farpour-Lambert NJ. Preclinical noninvasive markers of atherosclerosis in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes are influenced by physical activity. J Pediatr. 2010;157:533–539. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.04.023
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  71. 71.
    Valerio G, Spagnuolo MI, Lombardi F, Spadaro R, Siano M, Franzese A. Physical activity and sports participation in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2007;17:376–382. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2005.10.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  72. 72.
    Van Ryckeghem L, Franssen WMA, Verbaanderd E, Indesteege J, De Vriendt F, Verwerft J, Dendale P, Bito V, Hansen D. Cardiac Function is Preserved in Adolescents With Well-Controlled Type 1 Diabetes and a Normal Physical Fitness: A Cross-Sectional Study. Can J Diabetes. 2021;45:718–724 e711. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.01.010
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  73. 73.
    West NA, Hamman RF, Mayer-Davis EJ, D’Agostino RB, Jr., Marcovina SM, Liese AD, Zeitler PS, Daniels SR, Dabelea D. Cardiovascular risk factors among youth with and without type 2 diabetes: differences and possible mechanisms. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:175–180. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1442
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. 74.
    Woo J, Yeo NH, Shin KO, Lee HJ, Yoo J, Kang S. Antioxidant enzyme activities and DNA damage in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus after 12 weeks of exercise. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99:1263–1268. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01736.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. 75.
    Wu N, Bredin SSD, Jamnik VK, Koehle MS, Guan Y, Shellington EM, Li Y, Li J, Warburton DER. Association between physical activity level and cardiovascular risk factors in adolescents living with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20:62. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01255-0
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  76. 76.
    Yardley JE, MacMillan F, Hay J, Wittmeier K, Wicklow B, MacIntosh AC, McGavock J. The blood pressure response to exercise in youth with impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2015;27:120–127. doi: 10.1123/pes.2014-0062
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  77. 77.↵
    Kaya Mutlu E MC, Taşkıran H, Özgen İT. Relationship between Physical Activity Level and Depression, Anxiety, Quality of Life, Self-Esteem, and HBA1C in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Turk J Physiother Rehabil 2017;28:36–46.
    OpenUrl
  78. 78.↵
    Senechal M, Ayers CR, Szczepaniak LS, Gore MO, See R, Abdullah SM, Berry JD, McGuire DK, McGavock JM. Is cardiorespiratory fitness a determinant of cardiomyopathy in the setting of type 2 diabetes? Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2014;11:343–351. doi: 10.1177/1479164114540924
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. 79.↵
    Senechal M, Wicklow B, Wittmeier K, Hay J, MacIntosh AC, Eskicioglu P, Venugopal N, McGavock JM. Cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity in metabolically healthy overweight and obese youth. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e85–92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0296
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. 80.↵
    Pate RR, Wang CY, Dowda M, Farrell SW, O’Neill JR. Cardiorespiratory fitness levels among US youth 12 to 19 years of age: findings from the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:1005–1012. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.10.1005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  81. 81.↵
    Colley RC, Clarke J, Doyon CY, Janssen I, Lang JJ, Timmons BW, Tremblay MS. Trends in physical fitness among Canadian children and youth. Health Rep. 2019;30:3–13. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x201901000001-eng
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. 82.↵
    Tomkinson GR, Lang JJ, Tremblay MS, Dale M, LeBlanc AG, Belanger K, Ortega FB, Leger L. International normative 20 m shuttle run values from 1 142 026 children and youth representing 50 countries. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51:1545–1554. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-095987
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. 83.↵
    Soulimane S, Balkau B, Vogtschmidt YD, Toeller M, Fuller JH, Soedamah-Muthu SS. Incident cardiovascular disease by clustering of favourable risk factors in type 1 diabetes: the EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study. Diabetologia. 2022;65:1169–1178. doi: 10.1007/s00125-022-05698-2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  84. 84.↵
    Herbst A, Kapellen T, Schober E, Graf C, Meissner T, Holl RW, Initiative DPVS. Impact of regular physical activity on blood glucose control and cardiovascular risk factors in adolescents with type 2 diabetes mellitus--a multicenter study of 578 patients from 225 centres. Pediatr Diabetes. 2015;16:204–210. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12144
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. 85.
    Kriska A, Delahanty L, Edelstein S, Amodei N, Chadwick J, Copeland K, Galvin B, El ghormli L, Haymond M, Kelsey M, et al. Sedentary behavior and physical activity in youth with recent onset of type 2 diabetes. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e850–856. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0620
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. 86.↵
    Wittekind SG, Edwards NM, Khoury PR, McCoy CE, Dolan LM, Kimball TR, Urbina EM. Association of Habitual Physical Activity With Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Target Organ Damage in Adolescents and Young Adults. J Phys Act Health. 2018;15:176–182. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2017-0276
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
Posted August 20, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity among children and adolescents with diabetes: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
Hannah Steinman De Visser, Isaak Fast, Nicole Brunton, Edward Arevalo, Nicole Askin, Rasheda Rabbani, Ahmed M. Abou-Setta, Jonathan McGavock
medRxiv 2023.08.18.23294290; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.18.23294290
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area