Abstract
For orally administered drugs, palatability is key in ensuring patient acceptability and treatment compliance. Therefore, understanding children’s taste sensitivity and preferences can support formulators in making paediatric medicines more acceptable. Presently, we explore if the application of computer-vision techniques to videos of children’s reaction to gustatory taste strips can provide an objective assessment of palatability.
Primary school children tasted four different flavoured strips: no taste, bitter, sweet and sour. Data was collected at home, under the supervision of a guardian, with responses recorded using the Aparito Atom5™ app and smartphone camera. Participants scored each strip on a 5-point hedonic scale. Facial landmarks were identified in the videos, and quantitative measures such as changes around the eyes, nose and mouth were extracted to train models to classify strip taste and score. We received 197 videos and 256 self-reported scores from 64 participants. The hedonic scale elicited expected results: children like sweetness, dislike bitterness and have varying opinions for sourness. The findings revealed the complexity and variability of facial reactions and highlighted specific measures, such as eyebrow and mouth corner elevations, as significant indicators of palatability. This study into children’s taste specificities can improve the measurement of paediatric medicine acceptability. An objective measure of how children feel about the taste of medicines has great potential in helping find the most palatable formulation. Moreover, collecting data in the home setting allows for natural behaviour, with minimal burden for participants.
Author summary When formulating medicines for children, understanding the taste profile is crucial to ensure they are not excessively unpleasant. In this study, we assessed if facial reactions in response to taste stimuli can be used to easily measure children’s feelings about the taste. We recorded videos of children trying different taste strips and analysed their facial expressions in response to each taste. The strips had different flavours: bitter, sweet, sour, and one with no taste. We also asked the children to rate each strip on scale of 1 to 5. We collected data from 64 children. The results confirmed that children generally like sweet tastes and do not like bitter ones. Their opinions on sour taste varied. Moreover, we found that specific facial reactions, like changes in their eyebrows and mouth corners were good indicators of taste preferences. The analysis of facial expressions can help formulators make medicines for children taste better. By objectively measuring how children feel about the taste of medicines, we can create more acceptable medicines for them. The collection of this data at home ensured children were in their comfortable environment, making it easier for them to be part of the study.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
UCL research ethics committee (REC) gave ethical approval for this work. (4612/029)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
