Abstract
Background Decompressive craniectomy (DC) remains a controversial intervention for established or anticipated intracranial hypertension among patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH).
Methods We identified aSAH patients who underwent DC following microsurgical aneurysm repair from a prospectively maintained cerebrovascular registry and compared their outcomes with a propensity-matched cohort who did not. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of undergoing decompressive surgery and post-operative outcome. The outcomes of interest were inpatient mortality, unfavourable outcome at first and final follow-up, NIS-Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Outcome Measure and modified Rankin Score (mRS) at first and final follow-up.
Results A total of 246 consecutive patients with aSAH underwent microsurgical clipping of the culprit aneurysm between 01/09/2011 and 20/07/2020. Of these, 46 patients underwent DC and were included in the final analysis. Unsurprisingly, patients treated with DC had a greater chance of unfavourable outcome (p<0.001) and higher median mRS (p<0.001) compared with those who did not at final follow-up. Despite this, almost two-thirds (64.1%) of patients undergoing a DC had a favourable outcome at this time-point. When compared with a propensity-matched cohort who did not, patients treated with DC fared worse at all endpoints. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that the presence of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) and increased pre-operative mid-line shift were predictive of undergoing DC, and WFNS grade ≥ 4 and a delayed ischaemic neurological deficit requiring endovascular angioplasty were associated with an unfavourable outcome.
Conclusions Our data suggest that DC can be performed with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality, particularly among patients who present with lower grade aSAH. Further research is required to determine the superiority, or otherwise, of DC compared with structured medical management of intracranial hypertension in this context, and to identify predictors of requiring decompressive surgery and patient outcome.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project received a research support grant from the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Royal Adelaide Hospital Institutional Research Committee (Ref: 14309)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author, TJO