Abstract
Background Accurate monitoring of volume status is vital in managing diuretic therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Guidelines recommend daily measurement of standing body weight as an indicator of volume status, though many healthcare facilities use bed scales instead. There is limited data surrounding the accuracy of bed scales compared to standing scales, and literature suggests discrepancy between the two. This study is the first to evaluate the accuracy and correlation between scales among patients hospitalized for ADHF.
Methods Adults (age ≥18) diagnosed with ADHF and its derivatives who were hospitalized at our center between March and April 2023 were identified via electronic medical record. Patients were included if they demonstrated capacity to consent and were medically cleared to ambulate independently. Participants’ weights were measured via bed scale and standing scale at the same time on each day of data collection. The mean difference (bias), precision [standard deviation (SD)], and limits of agreement (±2 SD) were calculated and graphed using the Bland-Altman method. Based on expert opinion, a bias of greater than ± 0.6 kg and precision greater than ± 3.0 kg were considered clinically significant.
Results 51 pairs of bed and standing scale weights were obtained among 43 patients. The mean difference ± precision between weights was 1.42 ± 1.18 kg (95% CI, -0.894 – 3.73), exceeding the recommended bias. In addition, 71% (n=36) of participants’ weights differed by more than 0.6 kg between the bed and standing scale, 22% (n=11) differed by more than 2.0 kg, and 5.9% (n=3) differed by more than 4.0 kg (see Table I).
Conclusions Bed scales are not accurate compared to standing scales and may lead to errors in fluid management in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure.
What is Known
Adequate diuresis and volume status optimization are mainstays of therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure
Guidelines recommend measurement of standing body weight as an indicator of volume status, though many hospitals use bed scales instead
What the Study Adds
This is the first study to assess the difference in weights between bed and standing scales in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure
This study provides evidence that bed scale weights are not accurate compared to standing scale weights in this population
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The purchase of standing scales was funded as part of a quality improvement grant from the Committee of Interns and Residents (CIR).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The University of Southern California Institutional Review Board (IRB) - iSTAR Study ID: UP-23-00047 Approval Date: 3/1/23
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The participants of this study did not give written consent for their data to be shared publicly, so supporting data is not available.
