Extracellular Matrix Abnormalities in the Hippocampus of Subjects with Substance Use Disorder

Jake Valeri, Charlotte Stiplosek, Sinead M. O’Donovan, David Sinclair, Kathleen Grant, Ratna Bollavarapu, Donna M. Platt, Craig A. Stockmeier, Barbara Gisabella, Harry Pantazopoulos
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.07.23295222

ABSTRACT

Contextual triggers are significant factors contributing to relapse in substance use disorders (SUD). Emerging evidence points to a critical role of extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules as mediators of reward memories. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) are a subset of ECM molecules that form perineuronal nets (PNN) around inhibitory neurons. PNNs restrict synaptic connections and help maintain synapses. Rodent models suggest that modulation of PNNs may strengthen contextual reward memories in SUD. However, there is currently a lack of information regarding PNNs in the hippocampus of people with SUD as well as how comorbidity with major depressive disorder (MDD) may affect PNNs. We used postmortem hippocampal tissues from cohorts of human and nonhuman primates with or without chronic alcohol use to test the hypothesis that PNNs are increased in subjects with SUD. We used histochemical labeling and quantitative microscopy to examine PNNs, and qRT-PCR to examine gene expression for ECM molecules, synaptic markers and related markers. We identified increased densities of PNNs and CSPG-labeled glial cells in SUD, coinciding with decreased expression of the ECM protease matrix metalloproteinase 9 (Mmp9), and increased expression for the excitatory synaptic marker vesicle associated membrane protein 2 (Vamp2). Similar increases in PNNs were observed in monkeys with chronic alcohol self-administration. Subjects with MDD displayed changes opposite to SUD, and subjects with SUD and comorbid MDD had minimal changes in any of the outcome measures examined. Our findings demonstrate that PNNs are increased in SUD, possibly contributing to stabilizing contextual reward memories as suggested by preclinical studies. Our results also point to a previously unsuspected role for CSPG expression in glial cells in SUD. Evidence for increased hippocampal PNNs in SUD suggests that targeting PNNs to weaken contextual reward memories is a promising therapeutic approach for SUD, however comorbidity with MDD is a significant consideration.

INTRODUCTION

Substance use disorders (SUD) are a group of psychiatric disorders with substantially increased risk of mortality and severe socioeconomic burden affecting approximately 7 % of people in the United States annually 1, 2. SUDs impose a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality, exacerbated by persistently high rates of relapse and treatment failure 3. Contextual cues associated with drug use are a critical factor contributing to relapse in individuals with SUD and highlight the strength of memory circuits associated with reward processing 3-7. A growing number of studies indicate a critical role of extracellular matrix molecules (ECM) in the regulation of reward memories 8-17 (for reviews see 18, 19). Recent gene expression profiling studies demonstrate altered expression of pathways involved in ECM regulation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens of subjects with opioid use disorder (OUD) 12, 20 as well as in preclinical models of OUD 20.

Preclinical studies of cocaine, alcohol or opioid use demonstrate that alteration of specialized ECM structures called perineuronal nets (PNN) represent a key feature underlying reward memory in SUDs 8, 9, 17, 21-24. PNNs are ECM structures that envelop populations of fast-firing inhibitory neurons, stabilizing synapses on those neurons and restricting synaptic plasticity 16, 22, 25, 26. During acquisition of drug memories, endogenous proteases including matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) degrade PNN components to allow for formation of new synapses associated with reward memories. 11, 27-30. Chronic drug use resulting in prolonged re-activation of memory circuits results in enhancement of PNN components in the prefrontal cortex and insular cortex, stronger than at baseline, which stabilizes reward-associated synapses 9, 23, 24, 31-33 and may contribute to context-induced relapse 11, 27-30. Evidence that intracerebral injection of a pharmacological MMP inhibitor significantly weakens cocaine reward memories provides further support for this hypothesis 10. The hippocampus is at the center of neurocircuitry involved in reward memory processing 34. Specifically, accumulating evidence suggests that hippocampal sector CA1 is involved in integrating dopamine reward signaling with contextual memories and in regulating reward expectation and extinction 35-37. CA1 neurons receive dopaminergic projections from the ventral tegmental area and encode reward-associated spatial memories 37, 38. CA1 spatial maps are modified by reward expectation and by inhibitory control of excitatory neurons encoding these maps 37, 38. Inhibitory neurons in CA1 are often surround by PNNs, and alterations of hippocampal PNNs impact several neurotransmitter systems associated with reward processing. For example, PNN degradation alters firing rate of inhibitory parvalbumin (PVB) neurons 39, as well as NMDAR/AMPAR trafficking 40 and hippocampal dopamine transmission 41.

Despite this evidence, there is a lack of information regarding PNNs in the hippocampus of subjects with SUD, limiting the translatability of preclinical findings and the development of ECM-based therapies for context-induced relapse. Furthermore, subjects with SUD often have comorbid substance use and a high degree of comorbidity with major depressive disorder (MDD)42. These features are challenging to capture in preclinical models, potentially limiting translatability. We used a cohort of human postmortem samples from subjects with SUD with or without comorbid MDD to test the hypothesis that numerical density of PNNs is increased in sector CA1 of subjects with SUD, accompanied by altered expression of genes related to ECM degradation and biosynthesis, synaptic regulation, and PVB expression. This cohort includes retrospective clinical assessments, toxicology reports, history of substance use and medication history, allowing for testing of several of the features inherent in the population with SUD. Subjects with comorbid SUD and MDD, and subjects with MDD without SUD were included to examine the potential effects of comorbid MDD on ECM pathology in SUD. Furthermore, we used a collection of postmortem hippocampus samples from rhesus monkeys with or without chronic alcohol self-administration to examine the direct cause and effect on PNNs of the most common drug of abuse present across all our subjects with SUD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Postmortem brain samples

Human subjects for brightfield microscopy and RNA studies

Fresh frozen blocks containing the hippocampus from subjects with SUD (n=20), SUD and comorbid MDD (n=24), MDD (n=20), and psychiatrically normal controls (n=20) were provided by the UMMC Postmortem Brain Core (Table 1, Cohort A). Details are described in our previous report 43 and in the Supplemental Materials.

View this table:
Table 1. Basic cohort demographic information for both human and rhesus macaque subjects.

Abbreviations: SUD, substance use disorder; MDD, major depressive disorder; PFA: Paraformaldehyde; PMI, postmortem interval, BAC, blood alcohol concentration, 12-month average. Values represent mean ± SEM.

Psychiatric control subjects for confocal imaging

Paraformaldehyde fixed free-floating samples containing the hippocampus were obtained from a separate cohort of three control subjects from the Harvard Brain Tissue Resource Center (Table 1, Cohort B), as fresh frozen tissue is not suitable for reliable immunohistochemical labeling for parvalbumin and synaptic markers. Two psychiatrists determined the absence of DSM-IV diagnoses based on the review of a questionnaire filled out by legal next of kin and a review of all available medical records. Control cases had sufficient information from legally-defined next of kin and medical records to rule out major medical, neurologic, and psychiatric conditions. All brains underwent a complete neuropathological exam and cases with histopathological abnormalities were excluded from this study.

Rhesus macaque subjects

Fresh frozen hippocampus samples from adult male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) were obtained from the Monkey Alcohol Tissue Research Resource (MATRR) Cohort 5 (Table 1, Cohort C). Details regarding these subjects are available at www.matrr.com and described in the Supplemental Materials. Subjects were allowed to freely self-administer alcohol for 22 h daily for one year.

Tissue collection and processing

Fresh frozen postmortem samples (Cohorts A&C)

Coronal serial sections (14 μm) were obtained from fresh frozen postmortem hippocampal blocks. Blocks were dissected and rapidly frozen in 2-methylbutane and on dry ice without fixation and kept in dry ice before permanent storage at -80 °C. Blocks were sectioned using a Leica CM3050S cryostat.

Paraformaldehyde fixed control subjects (Cohort B)

Tissue blocks containing the hippocampus were processed as described previously 44.

Histochemical/immunocytochemical labeling, imaging, and quantification procedures

Brightfield microscopy

Fresh-frozen, slide-mounted medial hippocampal cryosections from human subjects and rhesus macaque subjects (3-5 sections per subject) were post-fixed for 30 minutes in 4% paraformaldehyde, followed by 1-hour incubation in 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA), and overnight incubation in biotinylated Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA) lectin (1:500, catalog #B-1355, Vector Labs). WFA binds to non-sulfated N-acetyl-D-galactosamine residues on the terminal ends of CSPGs 45. The following day, tissue was incubated in streptavidin horseradish peroxidase (1:5000 μl, Zymed, San Francisco, CA) for four hours, followed by a 20-minute incubation in 3’3-diaminobenzidine with nickel sulfate hexahydrate and H2O2. Tissue was dehydrated through an ethanol and xylene series, followed by histological labeling with Methyl Green (catalog #H-3402, Vector Labs). Sections were coverslipped and coded for blinded quantitative analysis. All sections included in the study were processed simultaneously to avoid procedural differences. Quantification was performed using an Olympus BX61 microscope and WFA-labeled PNNs were distinguished from WFA+ glial cells based on morphology. Each anatomical subdivision of the hippocampus was traced for an area measurement using a 20X objective, and WFA-labeled elements were quantified on 40X magnification using Stereo-Investigator v11.

Immunofluorescence and Imaging

Immunofluorescence for VAMP2-PVB-WFA and for GFAP-WFA were conducted as described previously 46, 47 and in the Supplemental Materials.

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction

qPCR was conducted as described previously 43, 48 and in the Supplemental Materials. The primers used are listed in Supplemental Table 21.

Statistical Analysis

Numerical densities of microscopy measures were calculated as described in our previous studies 49,46, 47. The goal of our study was to test for differences in PNN densities in CA1 and hippocampal gene expression of ECM and synaptic markers between diagnosis groups. Analysis of WFA-glial densities was focused on the DG and CA4 areas where these cells are primarily distributed in the hippocampus in our current study and our previous report 49. Diagnosis groups with comorbid SUD/MDD and MDD were included to test for potential effects of comorbid depression on findings in SUD. Exploratory analysis was conducted on microscopy measures of PNNs and WFA-glia on additional hippocampal sectors. Differences between groups relative to the main outcome measures were assessed for statistical significance using stepwise linear regression analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) using JMP Pro v16.1.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Logarithmic transformation was applied to values when not normally distributed. Potential confounding variables (Table 1 and Supplementary Tables 5-20) were tested systematically for their effects on main outcome measures and included in the model if they significantly improved goodness-of-fit. Covariates found to significantly affect outcome measures are reported. Subjects with SUD, subjects with SUD/MDD, and subjects with MDD were first compared separately with psychiatrically-normal controls. Subsequently, the four groups were considered together to test for differences between diagnostic groups and Bonferroni correction applied for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Altered PNN and WFA-glia densities in subjects with SUD, MDD, and comorbid SUD/MDD

Numerical densities of PNNs were significantly increased in CA1 stratum oriens (SO) of subjects with SUD (p < 0.007; adjusted for significant effects of PMI and cocaine history). (Figure 1A-E), where the majority of PNNs were distributed in sector CA1 (Control CA1 SO: 3.5 PNNs/mm2; Control CA1 SP: 0.97 PNNs/mm2). Further analysis of additional hippocampal sectors revealed increased numerical densities of PNNs in CA2 SO (p < 0.03; adjusted for significant effects of age), CA2 SP (p < 0.0001; adjusted for significant effects of cocaine history), CA3 SO (p <0.01; adjusted for significant effects of cocaine history), and CA4 (p < 0.007; adjusted for significant effects of cocaine history) in subjects with SUD (Figure 1G, Table S1). History of cocaine use, which was a significant covariate across hippocampal subregions, was associated with decreased PNNs in each of these regions (Figure S4D). No significant differences were found in the dentate gyrus or the CA1 and CA3 SP layers. In subjects with MDD, we observed significantly decreased numerical densities of PNNs in CA1 SO (p < 0.05; adjusted for significant effects of sex and calcium channel blockers) and CA1 SP (p < 0.02), increased PNNs in CA4 (p < 0.01; adjusted for significant effects of anxiety disorder diagnoses), and no significant differences in other regions of the hippocampus. The duration of depression positively correlated with PNN density in CA1 SO across subjects with SUD/MDD and MDD (Figure S1A). In subjects with comorbid SUD/MDD, we observed reduced numerical densities of PNNs in CA1 SP (p < 0.02; adjusted for significant effects of substance abuse history and duration of MDD, Figure S1B), increased densities of PNNs in CA2 SP (p < 0.01; adjusted for significant effects of SSRIs in the toxicology report and ZT time). No significant differences were observed in the other hippocampal subregions. Table S1 contains information for each hippocampus subregion, including p-values, F-ratios, adjusted least squares means, standard error, and significant covariates.

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Altered PNNs in SUD and MDD.

(A and B) Representative low-magnification photomicrographs of CA1 SO PNNs labeled by WFA, scalebars = 0.5 mm. (C and D) High-magnification photomicrographs of WFA-labeled CA1 SO PNNs, scalebars = 50 µm. (E) Diagnostic group comparisons of PNN densities in CA1 stratum oriens. Subjects with SUD had significantly increased densities of PNNs (p < 0.007; adjusted for significant effects of cocaine history and PMI) whereas subjects with MDD displayed significantly reduced PNN densities (p < 0.05; adjusted for significant effects of sex and calcium channel blockers). No significant effects were found in the comorbid SUD and MDD group. (F) Diagnostic group comparisons of normalized hippocampal Pvb gene expression, with a gradient increase between SUD (p < 0.007; adjusted for significant effects of cocaine in the toxicology report), SUD/MDD (p < 0.008; adjusted for significant effects of MDD duration), and MDD (p < 0.005). (G) Representative PNN quantification overlays of hippocampi from subjects within diagnostic groups. (H and I) Representative low-magnification photomicrographs of CA4 WFA-labeled glia, scalebars = 0.5 mm. (J and K) Representative high-magnification WFA-labeled glia, scalebars = 80 50 µm. (L) Numerical density measurements of CA4 WFA-labeled glial cells in subjects with SUD, MDD, and SUD/MDD. (M) Normalized gene expression of Gfap was significantly decreased in subjects with comorbid SUD and MDD (p < 0.02; adjusted for significant effects of antidepressant history), but unaffected in either isolated disorder. (N) Representative WFA+ glia quantification overlays of hippocampi from subjects within diagnostic groups. Error bars are mean ± SEM.

We observed WFA-labeled glial cells in addition to PNN labeling. WFA-glia in our current study were shown to co-express the astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (Figure S5) and were morphologically similar to WFA-glia described our previous reports in the human medial temporal lobe 46, 47. WFA-glial cells were distributed primarily in the dentate gyrus and CA4 areas, with sparse expression in other hippocampal subregions (Figure 1H-K, N). In subjects with SUD, we observed significantly greater density of WFA-glia in CA4 (p < 0.002; adjusted for significant effect of cocaine history), and in the dentate gyrus (p < 0.02; adjusted for significant effect of cocaine history, Figure 1L). No other hippocampal subregions displayed statistically significant differences in subjects with SUD. In subjects with MDD, we observed significantly increased densities of WFA-glia in the dentate gyrus (p < 0.0001), CA3 SP (p < 0.0008; adjusted for a significant effect of antidepressants in last month of life), CA2 SP (p < 0.006; adjusted for a significant effect of antidepressants in last month of life), and CA2 SO (p < 0.02). All other hippocampal subregions lacked differences in subjects with MDD. In subjects with comorbid SUD/MDD, we observed significantly decreased numerical densities of WFA-glia in the dentate gyrus (p < 0.02; adjusted for significant effects of alcohol in the toxicology report and calcium channel blockers), CA4 (p < 0.02; adjusted for a significant effect of alcohol in the toxicology report), CA3 SP (p < 0.002; adjusted for significant effects of alcohol in the toxicology report and race), CA2 SP (p < 0.004; adjusted for a significant effect of race), CA1 SP (p < 0.02; adjusted for significant effects of antipsychotics and alcohol in the toxicology report), and CA1 SO (p < 0.02; adjusted for a significant effect of race) when compared to psychiatric control subjects. Table S2 contains information for each hippocampus subregion. No differences in hippocampal area measurements were detected between control subjects and any of the diagnosis groups (Supplementary Table S4).

Gene expression of markers for cell populations associated with PNNs and WFA-glial cells

Parvalbumin

Neurons expressing parvalbumin (Pvb) mRNA represent the majority of neurons surrounded by PNNs in the hippocampus 49-51. Subjects with SUD had significantly greater gene expression of Pvb compared to control subjects (Fig. 1F, Table S3; p <0.007; adjusted for a significant effect of cocaine history). Subjects in the SUD group with cocaine in the blood at death had significantly lower Pvb gene expression compared to subjects with SUD without cocaine in the blood at death (Supplemental Figure S4B). Pvb mRNA was also significantly greater in subjects with comorbid SUD/MDD (p < 0.008), and subjects with MDD (p < 0.005) compared to control subjects (Fig. 1F, Table S3).

Glial fibrillary acidic protein

The astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (Gfap) colocalized with astrocytes labeled by WFA (Figure S5), which is in line with previous reports from human postmortem studies 46, 52. Gfap gene expression was significantly lower in the hippocampus of subjects with comorbid SUD/MDD (p < 0.02; adjusted for significant effects of SSRIs in last month of life which increases Gfap) (Fig. 1M, Table S3). No changes were detected in the SUD or MDD groups.

Altered expression of synaptic markers in the hippocampus of subjects with SUD

Synaptobrevin and Synapsin 1

Synaptobrevin (VAMP2) is an excitatory synaptic marker that contributes to the SNARE complex, allowing for fusion of vesicles to the cell membrane to facilitate neurotransmitter exocytosis and receptor trafficking 53, 54. We examined VAMP2 as a step towards altered synaptic regulation in the hippocampus of subjects with SUD as suggested by extensive literature indicating altered synaptic regulation by chronic exposure to substances of abuse (for review see 55). We first tested whether VAMP2 protein is located on PVB neurons and in PNNs, and observed VAMP2 protein on PVB neurons ensheathed by PNNs and enmeshed within the PNN (Figure 2B-E). In subjects with SUD, Vamp2 mRNA was significantly increased (p < 0.04; adjusted for a significant effect of sleep quality). An increase in Vamp2 transcription was also observed in subjects with MDD (p < 0.005; with significant effects of age, ZT time, and sleep disturbance). No changes in Vamp2 expression were detected in subjects with comorbid SUD/MDD. We conducted similar analysis for the inhibitory presynaptic marker, synapsin 1 (Syn1). We observed spatial overlap of SYN1 protein with PVB interneurons coated by PNNs, including SYN1 within PNNs (Figure 2G-J). In contrast to Vamp2, no significant differences were observed for Syn1 gene expression in any of the diagnostic groups (Figure 2F).

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Gene expression of the excitatory synaptic marker Vamp2 is altered in SUD and MDD.

(A) Gene expression of the presynaptic vesicle marker Vamp2 is increased in both SUD and MDD, but not in the comorbid condition. (B-E) Multiplex immunofluorescent imaging of VAMP2 immunoreactive puncta within a PNN and on the surface of a PVB interneuron. (B) WFA-labeled PNN (green), (C) PVB interneuron (blue) and VAMP2 synaptic puncta (red) and spatial overlap (yellow) (arrows indicate overlap). (D) Composite z-projection of WFA, PVB, and VAMP2. (E) Zoomed inset of 1D, with arrows denoting spatial overlap of VAMP2 with WFA (yellow puncta). (F) There were no significant changes in transcription of the synaptic marker Syn1 in any of the diagnostic groups. (G-J) Multiplex immunofluorescent imaging depicting SYN1 labeling within a PNN surrounding a PVB interneuron. (G) WFA-labeled PNN (green), (H) PVB neuron (blue) and SYN1 (red), (I) composite z-projection of all three channels. (J) Zoomed inset depicts spatial overlap with of SYN1 puncta with WFA labeling (arrows to yellow puncta). All scalebars are 10 µm. Error bars are mean ± SEM.

Altered expression of ECM molecules in the hippocampus of subjects with SUD

Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (Mmp9) and Cathepsin S (Ctss)

Significantly decreased expression of Mmp9 was observed in subjects with SUD (Figure 3A: p < 0.04). Furthermore, Ctss mRNA was significantly decreased in subjects with SUD (Figure 3B, S4: p < 0.03; with significant effects of cocaine in the toxicology report), and increased in subjects with MDD (p < 0.04; adjusted for significant effects of alcohol use severity and ZT time). No significant changes were observed in subjects with comorbid SUD/MDD (Figure 3A-B).

Figure 3.
Figure 3. Gene expression of ECM biosynthetic and regulatory molecules in SUD and MDD.

(A) Gene expression of the ECM proteolytic molecule Mmp9 was significantly decreased in subjects with SUD compared to controls (p < 0.05), but no significant differences were detected in the other two diagnostic groups. (B) Analysis of covariance uncovered significantly decreased mRNA levels of cathepsin S in subjects with SUD (p < 0.03; adjusted for significant effects of cocaine in the toxicology report). Subjects with MDD had significantly increased expression of cathepsin S compared to controls (p < 0.03; adjusted for significant effects of alcohol history and ZT time of death). (C) Gene expression of the CSPG aggrecan was significantly increased in subjects with comorbid SUD and MDD (p < 0.03) but was unaffected in either condition separately. (D) Gene expression of the CSPG biosynthetic molecule Chsy1 was significantly increased in subjects with SUD (p < 0.05; adjusted for significant effects of tissue pH) and in subjects with comorbid SUD and MDD (p < 0.0001; adjusted for significant effects of tissue pH and duration of AUD), while patients with MDD did not meet significance in any direction. Error bars are mean ± SEM.

Aggrecan and Chondroitin synthase 1

In subjects with SUD/MDD, we observed significantly increased aggrecan (Acan) (Figure 3C: p < 0.03), as well as chondroitin synthase 1 (Chsy1) mRNA (Figure 3D, S3B: p < 0.0001; with significant effects of duration of AUD and tissue pH). In subjects with SUD, a significant increase in Chsy1 expression was detected (Figure 3C, S3: p < 0.04; with a significant effect of tissue pH), and no significant difference was observed for Acan (Figure 3D). No changes were observed in subjects with MDD for either Acan or Chsy1 (Figure 3C&D).

Increased numerical densities of perineuronal nets in the hippocampus of monkeys with chronic alcohol self-administration

We observed a significant increase of PNNs in the combined hippocampal subfields in rhesus monkeys with chronic alcohol self-administration (p < 0.03). Similar increases were observed in CA1 SO (Figure 4E; p < 0.04), CA3 SO (Figure 4E; p < 0.03), and CA3 SP (Figure 4E; p < 0.03). We also detected significantly increased numerical densities of WFA-labeled glia in the dentate gyrus granule cell layer (Fig. 4F; p < 0.04).

Figure 4.
Figure 4. Chronic alcohol self-administration increases PNN densities throughout the hippocampus of rhesus monkeys.

Abbreviations: DG GCL, granule cell layer of the dentate gyrus; SLM, stratum lacunosum moleculare; SGZ, subgranular zone; CA, cornu ammonis; SO, stratum oriens; SP, stratum pyramidale. (A) Representative microscopy of PNNs labeled with WFA in CA1 SO, scalebar = 50 µm. (B) Inset of Figure 4A at high-magnification, scalebar = 30 µm. (C) Representative microscopy of a WFA-labeled glial cell proximal to the DG GCL, scalebar = 50 µm. (D) Inset of Figure 4C at 40× magnification, scalebar = 50 µm. (E) Comparisons of PNN densities throughout the hippocampus between control (white bars) and monkeys with chronic alcohol self-administration (red bars). (F) Comparison of WFA-glia densities in the DG GCL and DG SLM between control and monkeys with chronic alcohol self-administration. (G) Comparison of WFA-glia densities in the SGZ and CA nuclei of the hippocampus between control and monkeys with chronic alcohol self-administration.

Figure 5.
Figure 5. Summary diagram of proposed ECM and synaptic alterations in the hippocampus of subjects with SUD with or without comorbid MDD.

Panels providing visual depictions of pathological observations from the present study. Numbers of arrows describe the intensity of changes compared to the other diagnostic groups, and a key is provided within the control panel to characterize the graphics used within the figure. Created with BioRender.com.

DISCUSSION

Our data represent, to our knowledge, the first evidence for increased PNN densities in subjects with SUD and rhesus macaques with chronic alcohol self-administration. These findings link over a decade of evidence from preclinical models demonstrating increased PNNs in animals with chronic drug use 9, 17, 23, 24, 32, 56-58 with evidence in subjects with SUD. Together with the observed increased expression of the synaptic marker Vamp2 and the CSPG synthesis molecule Chsy1, this suggests that enhanced PNN composition may aid in stabilizing contextual reward-associated synapses in the CA1 hippocampus of individuals with SUD. CA1 hippocampal neurons receive dopaminergic projections from the ventral tegmental area and encode reward-related spatial memories 37, 38. These CA1 spatial maps are modulated by local inhibitory control of excitatory neurons that encode the spatial map 37, 38. Speculatively, increased PNNs in CA1 of subjects with SUD may contribute to selective inhibitory control of excitatory neurons to sustain spatial maps involved in drug reward memories. Contextual memory processing may differ between drugs of abuse, and preclinical studies report decreases or no change in PNN densities with some drug classes including chronic nicotine, cocaine or opioid exposure 17, 21, 31. Our findings represent hippocampal alterations in subjects with polysubstance use which consists of a significant population of people seeking treatment for SUDs. Similar findings in nonhuman primates with chronic alcohol use together with increased PNNs in preclinical models of cocaine suggests that increased PNN densities may be a shared feature in people with polysubstance use disorder which often includes alcohol use disorder 9, 24, 32, 59, 60. Furthermore, decreased expression of ECM proteolytic molecules indicates that changes in PNN densities are accompanied by decreased ECM remodeling in chronic SUD. Increased expression of parvalbumin, expressed by neurons that PNNs typically encapsulate, suggests increased feedforward inhibition of local excitatory pyramidal neurons by parvalbumin that may enhance coherence of drug-associated neuronal ensembles. In contrast, decreased densities of PNNs in subjects with MDD represent the first evidence for altered PNNs in the hippocampus of subjects with MDD. Taken together, our findings support the hypothesis that increased PNNs may stabilize contextual reward memories in subjects with SUD and thus may represent therapeutic targets for context-induced relapse. Furthermore, decreased densities of PNNs in subjects with MDD and lack of significant differences in subjects with comorbid SUD/MDD highlight the importance of considering comorbid conditions for the neuropathology of SUD.

PNNs and ECM molecules in the Hippocampus of Subjects with Substance Use Disorder

Our findings support an increasing number of preclinical studies demonstrating that PNNs stabilize reward memories 8, 9, 16, 17, 22-24, 33. Furthermore, PNNs are involved in a wide range of processes that can impact context-induced relapse including stabilization of synapses, receptor trafficking, and regulation of interneuron activity 25, 26, 39, 40, 61-67. Previous studies have implicated each of these processes in SUD. For example, chronic substance use has been shown to elicit downstream alteration of synapses and neurotransmitters including changes in dopamine 2 receptors (D2R) 68 as well as glutamatergic and GABAergic systems 69, 70. SUDs are chronically relapsing disorders which rely heavily on memory salience (i.e., cue responsiveness). PNNs contribute to synaptic homeostasis through the stabilization of synapses and PVB interneuron-mediated excitatory/inhibitory balance 71. Thus, PNNs may stabilize synapses involved in drug reward processes that contribute to context-induced relapse 18.

The association of PVB interneurons with PNNs has been demonstrated in several brain areas, including the hippocampus 49, 72-74. Hippocampal PVB neurons are predominantly located in the SO layers of the CA regions. PVB neurons are involved in modulating glutamatergic neurons and hippocampal output to brain regions involved in reward processing 75, 76. Increased PVB expression is positively correlated with PNN labeling 77 and removal of PNNs with chondroitinase ABC or antidepressants decreases PVB interneuron activity 78. Increased parvalbumin (PVB) expression in SUD may induce feedforward inhibition of local excitatory neurons that enhances coherence of drug-specific neuronal ensembles 79. Enhanced PNN composition on PVB neurons may also contribute to increased PVB expression and downstream consequences on excitatory/inhibitory balance which can result in altered activity of reward circuits involved in reward prediction and impulsivity 80, 81. Importantly, Pvb expression was significantly decreased in subjects with cocaine in their toxicology reports (Supplementary Figure 1G), suggesting that cocaine temporarily blunts PVB expression to disinhibit excitatory neurons57. Furthermore, decreased ECM proteolytic gene expression (Mmp9 and Ctss) in subjects with SUD is in line with increased PNN densities in these subjects and with preclinical models of hippocampal MMP9 expression in alcohol use 82, potentially suggesting hypofunction of PNN proteolytic systems in SUD 83. In our ANCOVA models, subjects with SUD who had cocaine in their toxicology reports had greater expression of Ctss (Supplementary Figure 1H). Speculatively, increased Ctss and decreased Pvb in subjects with cocaine in the toxicology report may indicate that cocaine temporally activates Ctss to temporarily degrade PNNs and decrease in Pvb expression.

There is extensive evidence demonstrating a central role of the hippocampus for episodic memory processing 84. Furthermore, the hippocampus has bi-directional connections with the amygdala that contribute to assigning emotional valence to contextual memories, which is crucial in the long-term retention of drug memories 85. Hippocampal connections with the ventral tegmental area (VTA) are involved in regulating memory salience and reward predictions. Hippocampal glutamatergic fibers from CA1 travel through the subiculum to basal forebrain structures, and synapse onto VTA neurons which feed back to the hippocampus to release dopamine 80, 81. Thus, increased PNNs in the hippocampus of subjects with SUD can impact this system and contribute to several aspects of reward memory circuits.

Our studies represent first description of increased numerical densities of WFA-glial cells in individuals with SUD. Despite previous evidence that WFA-glia colocalize with the astrocytic marker GFAP 46, 47, we did not detect increased GFAP expression in subjects with SUD, suggesting that increases in WFA-glia do not reflect a broader astrogliosis process. Increased WFA-glia in the hippocampus may indicate increased CSPG production by glia contributing to increased PNNs in SUD.

We used a proximal specie, Macaca mulatta, with or without chronic alcohol use to test for specific effects of the most common drug in our cohort without the covariates inherent to cross-sectional human studies. Increased PNN densities and WFA-glia in rhesus monkeys with chronic alcohol use provides support for our findings in human subjects. Furthermore, the ability of chronic alcohol use alone to create these changes is intriguing and represents the first evidence for increased PNNs in the hippocampus of non-human primates in response to any drug of abuse. The present findings also represent the first observation of WFA-labeled glia in the non-human primate brain; to this point, they have only been reported in human subjects 46, 49, 73. These WFA-glial cell increases may represent enhanced CSPG synthesis by astrocytes.

PNNs and ECM molecules in the Hippocampus of Subjects with Comorbid Substance Use Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder

Subjects with comorbid SUD and MDD represent a significant population of people with SUD and a bi-directional disorder where dysphoria can fuel the inclination to self-medicate. Alternatively, chronic drug use can contribute to mood disturbances 86. Approximately one third of patients with MDD also experience SUD, and conversely a substantial proportion of individuals with SUD will experience MDD at some point during prognosis 42, 87. This bi-directional comorbidity contributes to a heightened risk of suicide and greater social and personal impairment 88. Despite this relationship, co-occurrence of MDD and SUD is not typically examined in postmortem brain studies. Our results suggest MDD comorbidity is an important factor in studies of SUD. Inclusion of subjects with MDD may either mask or amplify changes present in each disorder. Most of our outcome measures displayed opposing directionality between subjects with SUD and MDD. For example, density of CA1 SO PNNs was significantly increased in SUD, decreased in MDD, and unaltered in subjects with comorbid SUD/MDD. In comparison, a comorbid diagnosis of MDD appeared to significantly amplify the existing increased expression of Chsy1 observed in subjects with SUD (Figure 3D).

Increased expression of Chsy1 in SUD and subjects with SUD/MDD may suggest that increased biosynthesis of CSPGs by chronic drug use is enhanced by processes underlying MDD. Expression of the CSPG aggrecan, a major PNN component 89, was increased in subjects with comorbid SUD/MDD. This may represent alterations in PNN composition that are not detected by standard WFA labeling.

PNNs and ECM molecules in the Hippocampus of Subjects with Major Depressive Disorder

A strength of our cohort was the ability to cross-examine the incidence of MDD comorbid with SUD as well as subjects with MDD only. While densities of PNNs were decreased in subjects with MDD (Fig. 1C), the duration of MDD positively correlated with densities of PNNs in CA1 SO (Supplementary Figure 1A). This is in line with preclinical evidence demonstrating that animals exposed to chronic social defeat display increased PNNs in the hippocampus 90. Over time, increased PNNs may alter E/I balance contributing to decreased hippocampal sharp wave ripple events that negatively affect mood and memory 91, 92. Increased expression of VAMP2 in subjects with MDD is in line with preclinical evidence for glucocorticoid-mediated calcium influx increases in hippocampal CA regions which perturbs plasticity, potentially resulting in poorer cognitive performance 93. Increased VAMP2 is also in agreement with evidence indicating altered synaptic markers in MDD 94. Decreases in PNNs may result in reduced stabilization of synapses and contribute to synaptic alterations, potentially resulting in memory impairment, memory generalization, and cognitive deficits observed in MDD 95. An extensive number of studies implicate glial cell alterations in the pathology of depression (for review see 96). In patients with SUD/MDD, we observed decreased expression of Gfap. A similar nonsignificant trend for decreased Gfap expression was observed in subjects with MDD. In our ANCOVA models, Gfap expression was significantly affected by history of SSRI exposure, which was positively associated with Gfap expression (Supplementary Figure 1B), suggesting that therapeutic effects of SSRIs may in part normalize Gfap levels. Our observed increase of Ctss gene expression may represent a heightened inflammatory state in the hippocampus of subjects with MDD, which has been extensively implicated in MDD 97, 98, including in the hippocampus in a cohort that largely overlaps with our cohort of subjects with MDD 99.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Several factors represent challenges in examining molecular pathology in the brain of subjects with SUD, including polysubstance use, comorbidity with MDD, and pharmacological treatments. However, considering that this is representative of the real-world population of SUD it is important to examine the molecular pathology when these factors are present in the same subjects when considering development of therapeutic treatment strategies for this population. Our cohort consists of extensive information including retrospective clinical assessments, history of specific drugs of abuse and presence or absence of drugs of abuse and psychiatric medications in the blood at death from toxicology reports that can be accounted for using ANCOVA analyses, as conducted in our previous study using this same cohort 43. Furthermore, the inclusion of samples from rhesus monkeys with chronic alcohol use provides a valuable cause and effect comparison for the most common drug of abuse in our human subjects. The development of additional collections of NHP brain samples containing subjects self-administering specific drugs of abuse alone or in combination would further aide in interpreting human postmortem brain studies and guiding strategies for novel treatment development. For our microscopy studies, use of WFA lectin provides a standard view of a specific population of PNNs, as it binds to non-sulfated N-acetyl-D-galactosamine 45. There are other populations of PNNs that can be detected with alternative labeling methods which may surround complementary populations of neurons 100. Future studies with additional markers for PNN core proteins and sulfation motifs will provide insight into the specific components of PNNs in SUD. Further, our fresh frozen postmortem tissue has inherent technical limitations including lack of ability to conduct PVB-immunolabeling as well as reliable immunolabeling of synaptic markers, therefore mRNA measures were used for these markers. Measurements of mRNA by qPCR do not identify the cell-types responsible for synthesis or functional activity of any of the genes measured.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, our findings represent the first evidence for increased numerical densities of PNNs in the hippocampus of human subjects with SUD. Increased densities of hippocampal PNNs, together with decreased expression of ECM proteolytic genes and altered synaptic markers supports preclinical studies that suggest that PNNs may stabilize reward memories. Thus, PNNs and ECM molecules may represent promising targets for addressing cue-induced relapse in SUD. In comparison, subjects with MDD displayed generally opposite effects for many of the main outcome measures and subjects with SUD with a comorbid diagnosis of MDD suggesting that ECM changes in MDD oppose changes in SUD. These findings highlight the importance of considering comorbidities regarding SUD pathology and treatment strategies.

Funding

This work was funded by support from the National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH125833 and R01 MH117460), the National Institute of Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse (F31 AA030166 and R01 AA029023), and the Postmortem Brain Core of the Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, funded through an IDeA COBRE award from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P30 GM103328).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no competing financial interests to disclose.

Data Availability Statement

The data and original contributions presented in this study are included in the manuscript or supplemental materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgements

The authors deeply appreciate the invaluable contributions made by the families consenting to donate brain tissue and be interviewed. We also gratefully acknowledge the support of the staff of the Cuyahoga County Medical Examiner’s Office, Cleveland, Ohio. We acknowledge the expert assistance of Drs. James C. Overholser, George Jurjus, Lisa C. Konick, and of Lesa Dieter in establishing the psychiatric diagnoses, acquiring written consent and in collecting the tissues. For some of the subjects, the services of Timothy M. De Jong in acquiring written consent and Lisa Larkin and Nicole Herbst in tissue collection are gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

  • The manuscript has been revised to update the figures, results section, introduction, and discussion.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Grant BF, Saha TD, Ruan WJ, Goldstein RB, Chou SP, Jung J et al. Epidemiology of DSM-5 Drug Use Disorder: Results From the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III. JAMA Psychiatry 2016; 73(1): 39–47.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    SAMHSA. Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. In: Services USDoHaH (ed). www.samhsa.gov/data, 2018.
  3. 3.↵
    Zironi I, Burattini C, Aicardi G, Janak PH. Context is a trigger for relapse to alcohol. Behav Brain Res 2006; 167(1): 150–155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.
    Carter BL, Tiffany ST. Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction 1999; 94(3): 327–340.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.
    Niaura RS, Rohsenow DJ, Binkoff JA, Monti PM, Pedraza M, Abrams DB. Relevance of cue reactivity to understanding alcohol and smoking relapse. J Abnorm Psychol 1988; 97(2): 133–152.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.
    Weiss F. Neurobiology of craving, conditioned reward and relapse. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2005; 5(1): 9–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Janak PH, Chaudhri N. The Potent Effect of Environmental Context on Relapse to Alcohol-Seeking After Extinction. Open Addict J 2010; 3: 76–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Xue YX, Xue LF, Liu JF, He J, Deng JH, Sun SC et al. Depletion of perineuronal nets in the amygdala to enhance the erasure of drug memories. J Neurosci 2014; 34(19): 6647–6658.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Slaker M, Churchill L, Todd RP, Blacktop JM, Zuloaga DG, Raber J et al. Removal of perineuronal nets in the medial prefrontal cortex impairs the acquisition and reconsolidation of a cocaine-induced conditioned place preference memory. J Neurosci 2015; 35(10): 4190–4202.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Brown TE, Forquer MR, Cocking DL, Jansen HT, Harding JW, Sorg BA. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in the acquisition and reconsolidation of cocaine-induced conditioned place preference. Learn Mem 2007; 14(3): 214–223.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Smith AW, Nealey KA, Wright JW, Walker BM. Plasticity associated with escalated operant ethanol self-administration during acute withdrawal in ethanol-dependent rats requires intact matrix metalloproteinase systems. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2011; 96(2): 199–206.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Seney ML, Kim SM, Glausier JR, Hildebrand MA, Xue X, Zong W et al. Transcriptional Alterations in Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Nucleus Accumbens Implicate Neuroinflammation and Synaptic Remodeling in Opioid Use Disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2021; 90(8): 550–562.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.
    Browne CJ, Futamura R, Minier-Toribio A, Hicks EM, Ramakrishnan A, Martínez-Rivera F et al. Transcriptional signatures of heroin intake and seeking throughout the brain reward circuit. bioRxiv 2023: 2023.2001.2011.523688.
  14. 14.
    Chioma VC, Kruyer A, Bobadilla AC, Angelis A, Ellison Z, Hodebourg R et al. Heroin Seeking and Extinction From Seeking Activate Matrix Metalloproteinases at Synapses on Distinct Subpopulations of Accumbens Cells. Biol Psychiatry 2021; 89(10): 947–958.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.
    Smith AC, Scofield MD, Kalivas PW. The tetrapartite synapse: Extracellular matrix remodeling contributes to corticoaccumbens plasticity underlying drug addiction. Brain Res 2015; 1628(Pt A): 29–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Slaker M, Blacktop JM, Sorg BA. Caught in the Net: Perineuronal Nets and Addiction. Neural Plast 2016; 2016: 7538208.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Roura-Martinez D, Diaz-Bejarano P, Ucha M, Paiva RR, Ambrosio E, Higuera-Matas A. Comparative analysis of the modulation of perineuronal nets in the prefrontal cortex of rats during protracted withdrawal from cocaine, heroin and sucrose self-administration. Neuropharmacology 2020; 180: 108290.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Valeri J, Gisabella B, Pantazopoulos H. Dynamic regulation of the extracellular matrix in reward memory processes: a question of time. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience 2023; 17: 1208974.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    Ray MH, Williams BR, Kuppe MK, Bryant CD, Logan RW. A Glitch in the Matrix: The Role of Extracellular Matrix Remodeling in Opioid Use Disorder. Front Integr Neurosci 2022; 16: 899637.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    Browne CJ, Futamura R, Minier-Toribio A, Hicks EM, Ramakrishnan A, Martinez-Rivera FJ et al. Transcriptional signatures of heroin intake and relapse throughout the brain reward circuitry in male mice. Sci Adv 2023; 9(23): eadg8558.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    Vazquez-Sanroman DB, Monje RD, Bardo MT. Nicotine self-administration remodels perineuronal nets in ventral tegmental area and orbitofrontal cortex in adult male rats. Addict Biol 2017; 22(6): 1743–1755.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Fawcett JW, Fyhn M, Jendelova P, Kwok JCF, Ruzicka J, Sorg BA. The extracellular matrix and perineuronal nets in memory. Mol Psychiatry 2022; 27(8): 3192–3203.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    Lasek AW, Chen H, Chen WY. Releasing Addiction Memories Trapped in Perineuronal Nets. Trends Genet 2018; 34(3): 197–208.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Chen H, He D, Lasek AW. Repeated Binge Drinking Increases Perineuronal Nets in the Insular Cortex. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2015; 39(10): 1930–1938.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Gogolla N, Caroni P, Luthi A, Herry C. Perineuronal nets protect fear memories from erasure. Science 2009; 325(5945): 1258-1261.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Pizzorusso T, Medini P, Berardi N, Chierzi S, Fawcett JW, Maffei L. Reactivation of ocular dominance plasticity in the adult visual cortex. Science 2002; 298(5596): 1248-1251.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    Wright JW, Masino AJ, Reichert JR, Turner GD, Meighan SE, Meighan PC et al. Ethanol-induced impairment of spatial memory and brain matrix metalloproteinases. Brain Res 2003; 963(1-2): 252–261.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.
    Natarajan R, Harding JW, Wright JW. A role for matrix metalloproteinases in nicotine-induced conditioned place preference and relapse in adolescent female rats. J Exp Neurosci 2013; 7: 1–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.
    Smith AC, Kupchik YM, Scofield MD, Gipson CD, Wiggins A, Thomas CA et al. Synaptic plasticity mediating cocaine relapse requires matrix metalloproteinases. Nat Neurosci 2014; 17(12): 1655–1657.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Stefaniuk M, Beroun A, Lebitko T, Markina O, Leski S, Meyza K et al. Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 and Synaptic Plasticity in the Central Amygdala in Control of Alcohol-Seeking Behavior. Biol Psychiatry 2017; 81(11): 907–917.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    Van den Oever MC, Lubbers BR, Goriounova NA, Li KW, Van der Schors RC, Loos M et al. Extracellular matrix plasticity and GABAergic inhibition of prefrontal cortex pyramidal cells facilitates relapse to heroin seeking. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010; 35(10): 2120–2133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Slaker ML, Jorgensen ET, Hegarty DM, Liu X, Kong Y, Zhang F et al. Cocaine Exposure Modulates Perineuronal Nets and Synaptic Excitability of Fast-Spiking Interneurons in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex. eNeuro 2018; 5(5).
  33. 33.↵
    Lasek AW. Effects of Ethanol on Brain Extracellular Matrix: Implications for Alcohol Use Disorder. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2016; 40(10): 2030–2042.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    Goode TD, Maren S. Common neurocircuitry mediating drug and fear relapse in preclinical models. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2019; 236(1): 415–437.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    Goldsmith SK, Joyce JN. Dopamine D2 receptor expression in hippocampus and parahippocampal cortex of rat, cat, and human in relation to tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoreactive fibers. Hippocampus 1994; 4(3): 354–373.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.
    Galvez-Marquez DK, Salgado-Menez M, Moreno-Castilla P, Rodriguez-Duran L, Escobar ML, Tecuapetla F et al. Spatial contextual recognition memory updating is modulated by dopamine release in the dorsal hippocampus from the locus coeruleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119(49): e2208254119.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    Krishnan S, Heer C, Cherian C, Sheffield MEJ. Reward expectation extinction restructures and degrades CA1 spatial maps through loss of a dopaminergic reward proximity signal. Nature communications 2022; 13(1): 6662.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    Trouche S, Perestenko PV, van de Ven GM, Bratley CT, McNamara CG, Campo-Urriza N et al. Recoding a cocaine-place memory engram to a neutral engram in the hippocampus. Nat Neurosci 2016; 19(4): 564–567.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    Wingert JC, Sorg BA. Impact of Perineuronal Nets on Electrophysiology of Parvalbumin Interneurons, Principal Neurons, and Brain Oscillations: A Review. Front Synaptic Neurosci 2021; 13: 673210.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    Frischknecht R, Heine M, Perrais D, Seidenbecher CI, Choquet D, Gundelfinger ED. Brain extracellular matrix affects AMPA receptor lateral mobility and short-term synaptic plasticity. Nat Neurosci 2009; 12(7): 897-904.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    Shah A, Lodge DJ. A loss of hippocampal perineuronal nets produces deficits in dopamine system function: relevance to the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Transl Psychiatry 2013; 3(1): e215.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    Mueller TI, Lavori PW, Keller MB, Swartz A, Warshaw M, Hasin D et al. Prognostic effect of the variable course of alcoholism on the 10-year course of depression. Am J Psychiatry 1994; 151(5): 701–706.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    Valeri J, O’Donovan SM, Wang W, Sinclair D, Bollavarapu R, Gisabella B et al. Altered expression of somatostatin signaling molecules and clock genes in the hippocampus of subjects with substance use disorder. Front Neurosci 2022; 16: 903941.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    Konradi C, Yang CK, Zimmerman EI, Lohmann KM, Gresch P, Pantazopoulos H et al. Hippocampal interneurons are abnormal in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2011; 131(1-3): 165–173.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    Nadanaka S, Miyata S, Yaqiang B, Tamura JI, Habuchi O, Kitagawa H. Reconsideration of the Semaphorin-3A Binding Motif Found in Chondroitin Sulfate Using Galnac4s-6st-Knockout Mice. Biomolecules 2020; 10(11).
  46. 46.↵
    Pantazopoulos H, Murray EA, Berretta S. Total number, distribution, and phenotype of cells expressing chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans in the normal human amygdala. Brain Res 2008; 1207: 84–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    Pantazopoulos H, Woo TU, Lim MP, Lange N, Berretta S. Extracellular matrix-glial abnormalities in the amygdala and entorhinal cortex of subjects diagnosed with schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010; 67(2): 155–166.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    O’Donovan SM, Sullivan C, Koene R, Devine E, Hasselfeld K, Moody CL et al. Cell-subtype-specific changes in adenosine pathways in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 2018; 43(8): 1667–1674.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. 49.↵
    Pantazopoulos H, Sawyer C, Heckers S, Berretta S, Markota M. Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycan Abnormalities in the Hippocampus of Subjects with Schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 2014; 39: S298–S299.
    OpenUrl
  50. 50.
    Yamada J, Jinno S. Spatio-temporal differences in perineuronal net expression in the mouse hippocampus, with reference to parvalbumin. Neuroscience 2013; 253: 368–379.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    Rogers SL, Rankin-Gee E, Risbud RM, Porter BE, Marsh ED. Normal Development of the Perineuronal Net in Humans; In Patients with and without Epilepsy. Neuroscience 2018; 384: 350-360.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    Pantazopoulos H, Woo TU, Lim MP, Lange N, Berretta S. Extracellular matrix-glial abnormalities in the amygdala and entorhinal cortex of subjects diagnosed with schizophrenia. Archives of general psychiatry 2010; 67(2): 155–166.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    Yan C, Jiang J, Yang Y, Geng X, Dong W. The function of VAMP2 in mediating membrane fusion: An overview. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 2022; 15.
  54. 54.↵
    Torres VI, Vallejo D, Inestrosa NC. Emerging Synaptic Molecules as Candidates in the Etiology of Neurological Disorders. Neural Plast 2017; 2017: 8081758.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. 55.↵
    Neuhofer D, Kalivas P. Metaplasticity at the addicted tetrapartite synapse: A common denominator of drug induced adaptations and potential treatment target for addiction. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 2018; 154: 97–111.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. 56.↵
    Gonzalez AE, Jorgensen ET, Ramos JD, Harkness JH, Aadland JA, Brown TE et al. Impact of Perineuronal Net Removal in the Rat Medial Prefrontal Cortex on Parvalbumin Interneurons After Reinstatement of Cocaine Conditioned Place Preference. Front Cell Neurosci 2022; 16: 932391.
    OpenUrl
  57. 57.↵
    Jorgensen ET, Gonzalez AE, Harkness JH, Hegarty DM, Thakar A, Burchi DJ et al. Cocaine memory reactivation induces functional adaptations within parvalbumin interneurons in the rat medial prefrontal cortex. Addict Biol 2021; 26(3): e12947.
    OpenUrl
  58. 58.↵
    Blacktop JM, Sorg BA. Perineuronal nets in the lateral hypothalamus area regulate cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology 2019; 44(5): 850–858.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  59. 59.↵
    Guarque-Chabrera J, Sanchez-Hernandez A, Ibanez-Marin P, Melchor-Eixea I, Miquel M. Role of Perineuronal nets in the cerebellar cortex in cocaine-induced conditioned preference, extinction, and reinstatement. Neuropharmacology 2022; 218: 109210.
    OpenUrl
  60. 60.↵
    Vazquez-Sanroman D, Leto K, Cerezo-Garcia M, Carbo-Gas M, Sanchis-Segura C, Carulli D et al. The cerebellum on cocaine: plasticity and metaplasticity. Addict Biol 2015; 20(5): 941–955.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. 61.↵
    Kalb RG, Hockfield S. Molecular evidence for early activity-dependent development of hamster motor neurons. J Neurosci 1988; 8(7): 2350–2360.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. 62.
    Sugiyama S, Di Nardo AA, Aizawa S, Matsuo I, Volovitch M, Prochiantz A et al. Experience-dependent transfer of Otx2 homeoprotein into the visual cortex activates postnatal plasticity. Cell 2008; 134(3): 508–520.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  63. 63.
    Frischknecht R, Gundelfinger ED. The brain’s extracellular matrix and its role in synaptic plasticity. Adv Exp Med Biol 2012; 970: 153-171.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. 64.
    Dityatev A, Schachner M, Sonderegger P. The dual role of the extracellular matrix in synaptic plasticity and homeostasis. Nat Rev Neurosci 2010; 11(11): 735–746.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. 65.
    Gundelfinger ED, Frischknecht R, Choquet D, Heine M. Converting juvenile into adult plasticity: a role for the brain’s extracellular matrix. Eur J Neurosci 2010; 31(12): 2156–2165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. 66.
    Cabungcal JH, Steullet P, Morishita H, Kraftsik R, Cuenod M, Hensch TK et al. Perineuronal nets protect fast-spiking interneurons against oxidative stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110(22): 9130–9135.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. 67.↵
    Morawski M, Bruckner MK, Riederer P, Bruckner G, Arendt T. Perineuronal nets potentially protect against oxidative stress. Exp Neurol 2004; 188(2): 309–315.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  68. 68.↵
    Trifilieff P, Martinez D. Imaging addiction: D2 receptors and dopamine signaling in the striatum as biomarkers for impulsivity. Neuropharmacology 2014; 76 Pt B(0 0): 498-509.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  69. 69.↵
    Li JN, Liu XL, Li L. Prefrontal GABA and glutamate levels correlate with impulsivity and cognitive function of prescription opioid addicts: A (1) H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2020; 74(1): 77–83.
    OpenUrl
  70. 70.↵
    D’Souza MS, Markou A. The "stop" and "go" of nicotine dependence: role of GABA and glutamate. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2013; 3(6).
  71. 71.↵
    Balmer TS. Perineuronal Nets Enhance the Excitability of Fast-Spiking Neurons. eNeuro 2016; 3(4).
  72. 72.↵
    Steullet P, Cabungcal JH, Bukhari SA, Ardelt MI, Pantazopoulos H, Hamati F et al. The thalamic reticular nucleus in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: role of parvalbumin-expressing neuron networks and oxidative stress. Mol Psychiatry 2017.
  73. 73.↵
    Pantazopoulos H, Woo T-UW, Lim MP, Lange N, Berretta S. Extracellular Matrix-Glial Abnormalities in the Amygdala and Entorhinal Cortex of Subjects Diagnosed With Schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010; 67(2): 155–166.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  74. 74.↵
    Pantazopoulos H, Lange N, Hassinger L, Berretta S. Subpopulations of neurons expressing parvalbumin in the human amygdala. The Journal of comparative neurology 2006; 496(5): 706–722.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  75. 75.↵
    Espinoza C, Guzman SJ, Zhang X, Jonas P. Parvalbumin+ interneurons obey unique connectivity rules and establish a powerful lateral-inhibition microcircuit in dentate gyrus. Nature Communications 2018; 9(1): 4605.
    OpenUrl
  76. 76.↵
    Udakis M, Pedrosa V, Chamberlain SEL, Clopath C, Mellor JR. Interneuron-specific plasticity at parvalbumin and somatostatin inhibitory synapses onto CA1 pyramidal neurons shapes hippocampal output. Nature Communications 2020; 11(1): 4395.
    OpenUrl
  77. 77.↵
    Yamada J, Ohgomori T, Jinno S. Perineuronal nets affect parvalbumin expression in GABAergic neurons of the mouse hippocampus. Eur J Neurosci 2015; 41(3): 368–378.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. 78.↵
    Lesnikova A, Casarotto PC, Fred SM, Voipio M, Winkel F, Steinzeig A et al. Chondroitinase and Antidepressants Promote Plasticity by Releasing TRKB from Dephosphorylating Control of PTPσ in Parvalbumin Neurons. J Neurosci 2021; 41(5): 972–980.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  79. 79.↵
    Brown TE, Sorg BA. Net gain and loss: influence of natural rewards and drugs of abuse on perineuronal nets. Neuropsychopharmacology 2023; 48(1): 3–20.
    OpenUrl
  80. 80.↵
    Huang YY, Kandel ER. D1/D5 receptor agonists induce a protein synthesis-dependent late potentiation in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995; 92(7): 2446–2450.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. 81.↵
    Gasbarri A, Packard MG, Campana E, Pacitti C. Anterograde and retrograde tracing of projections from the ventral tegmental area to the hippocampal formation in the rat. Brain Res Bull 1994; 33(4): 445–452.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  82. 82.↵
    Yin LT, Xie XY, Xue LY, Yang XR, Jia J, Zhang Y et al. Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Overexpression Regulates Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity and Decreases Alcohol Consumption and Preference in Mice. Neurochem Res 2020; 45(8): 1902–1912.
    OpenUrl
  83. 83.↵
    Samochowiec A, Grzywacz A, Kaczmarek L, Bienkowski P, Samochowiec J, Mierzejewski P et al. Functional polymorphism of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) gene in alcohol dependence: family and case control study. Brain Res 2010; 1327: 103–106.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  84. 84.↵
    Eichenbaum H. Prefrontal–hippocampal interactions in episodic memory. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2017; 18(9): 547–558.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. 85.↵
    Goodman J, Packard MG. Memory Systems and the Addicted Brain. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2016; 7.
  86. 86.↵
    Markou A, Kosten TR, Koob GF. Neurobiological similarities in depression and drug dependence: a self-medication hypothesis. Neuropsychopharmacology 1998; 18(3): 135–174.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  87. 87.↵
    Gilman SE, Abraham HD. A longitudinal study of the order of onset of alcohol dependence and major depression. Drug Alcohol Depend 2001; 63(3): 277–286.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  88. 88.↵
    Young MA, Fogg LF, Scheftner WA, Fawcett JA. Interactions of risk factors in predicting suicide. Am J Psychiatry 1994; 151(3): 434–435.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  89. 89.↵
    Roughley PJ, Mort JS. The role of aggrecan in normal and osteoarthritic cartilage. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics 2014; 1(1): 8.
    OpenUrl
  90. 90.↵
    Riga D, Kramvis I, Koskinen MK, van Bokhoven P, van der Harst JE, Heistek TS et al. Hippocampal extracellular matrix alterations contribute to cognitive impairment associated with a chronic depressive-like state in rats. Sci Transl Med 2017; 9(421).
  91. 91.↵
    Blanco I, Conant K. Extracellular matrix remodeling with stress and depression: Studies in human, rodent and zebrafish models. Eur J Neurosci 2021; 53(12): 3879–3888.
    OpenUrl
  92. 92.↵
    Sun ZY, Bozzelli PL, Caccavano A, Allen M, Balmuth J, Vicini S et al. Disruption of perineuronal nets increases the frequency of sharp wave ripple events. Hippocampus 2018; 28(1): 42–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  93. 93.↵
    Karst H, Joëls M. Corticosterone Slowly Enhances Miniature Excitatory Postsynaptic Current Amplitude in Mice CA1 Hippocampal Cells. Journal of Neurophysiology 2005; 94(5): 3479–3486.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  94. 94.↵
    Duric V, Banasr M, Stockmeier CA, Simen AA, Newton SS, Overholser JC et al. Altered expression of synapse and glutamate related genes in post-mortem hippocampus of depressed subjects. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2013; 16(1): 69–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. 95.↵
    Perini G, Cotta Ramusino M, Sinforiani E, Bernini S, Petrachi R, Costa A. Cognitive impairment in depression: recent advances and novel treatments. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2019; 15: 1249–1258.
    OpenUrl
  96. 96.↵
    Miguel-Hidalgo JJ. Astrocytes as Context for the Involvement of Myelin and Nodes of Ranvier in the Pathophysiology of Depression and Stress-Related Disorders. J Psychiatr Brain Sci 2023; 8.
  97. 97.↵
    Kohler-Forsberg O, C NL, Hjorthoj C, Nordentoft M, Mors O, Benros ME. Efficacy of anti-inflammatory treatment on major depressive disorder or depressive symptoms: meta-analysis of clinical trials. Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica 2019; 139(5): 404–419.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. 98.↵
    Fries GR, Saldana VA, Finnstein J, Rein T. Molecular pathways of major depressive disorder converge on the synapse. Mol Psychiatry 2023; 28(1): 284–297.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  99. 99.↵
    Mahajan GJ, Vallender EJ, Garrett MR, Challagundla L, Overholser JC, Jurjus G et al. Altered neuro-inflammatory gene expression in hippocampus in major depressive disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2018; 82: 177–186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. 100.↵
    Scarlett JM, Hu SJ, Alonge KM. The "Loss" of Perineuronal Nets in Alzheimer’s Disease: Missing or Hiding in Plain Sight? Front Integr Neurosci 2022; 16: 896400.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top
Posted January 02, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Extracellular Matrix Abnormalities in the Hippocampus of Subjects with Substance Use Disorder
Jake Valeri, Charlotte Stiplosek, Sinead M. O’Donovan, David Sinclair, Kathleen Grant, Ratna Bollavarapu, Donna M. Platt, Craig A. Stockmeier, Barbara Gisabella, Harry Pantazopoulos
medRxiv 2023.09.07.23295222; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.07.23295222
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area