Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Estimating the population effectiveness of interventions against COVID-19 in France: a modelling study

View ORCID ProfileIris Ganser, View ORCID ProfileDavid L Buckeridge, View ORCID ProfileJane Heffernan, View ORCID ProfileMélanie Prague, Rodolphe Thiébaut
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.14.23295425
Iris Ganser
aUniv. Bordeaux, Inserm, BPH Research Center, SISTM Team, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France
bMcGill Health Informatics, School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Iris Ganser
David L Buckeridge
bMcGill Health Informatics, School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David L Buckeridge
Jane Heffernan
cMathematics & Statistics, Centre for Disease Modelling, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jane Heffernan
Mélanie Prague
aUniv. Bordeaux, Inserm, BPH Research Center, SISTM Team, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France
dInria, Inria Bordeaux - Sud-Ouest, Talence, France
eVaccine Research Institute, F-94010 Creteil, France
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mélanie Prague
Rodolphe Thiébaut
aUniv. Bordeaux, Inserm, BPH Research Center, SISTM Team, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France
dInria, Inria Bordeaux - Sud-Ouest, Talence, France
eVaccine Research Institute, F-94010 Creteil, France
fBordeaux University Hospital, Medical Information Department, Bordeaux, France
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rodolphe.thiebaut{at}u-bordeaux.fr
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and vaccines have been widely used to manage the COVID-19 pandemic. However, uncertainty persists regarding the effectiveness of these interventions due to data quality issues, methodological challenges, and differing contextual factors. Accurate estimation of their effects is crucial for future epidemic preparedness.

Methods To address this, we developed a population-based mechanistic model that includes the impact of NPIs and vaccines on SARS-CoV-2 transmission and hospitalization rates. Our statistical approach estimated all parameters in one step, accurately propagating uncertainty. We fitted the model to comprehensive epidemiological data in France from March 2020 to October 2021. With the same model, we simulated scenarios of vaccine rollout.

Results The first lockdown was the most effective, reducing transmission by 84% (95% confidence interval (CI) 83-85). Subsequent lockdowns had diminished effectiveness (reduction of 74% (69-77) and 11% (9-18), respectively). A 6 pm curfew was more effective than one at 8 pm (68% (66-69) vs. 48% (45-49) reduction), while school closures reduced transmission by 15% (12-18). In a scenario without vaccines before November 2021, we predicted 159,000 or 168% (95% prediction interval (PI) 70-315) more deaths and 1,488,000 or 300% (133-492) more hospitalizations. If a vaccine had been available after 100 days, over 71,000 deaths (16,507-204,249) and 384,000 (88,579-1,020,386) hospitalizations could have been averted.

Conclusion Our results highlight the substantial impact of NPIs, including lockdowns and curfews, in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. We also demonstrate the value of the 100 days objective of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) initiative for vaccine availability.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding. IG is supported within the framework of the PIA3 (Investment for the Future), project reference: 17-EURE-0019, and by a doctoral award from the Fonds de recherche du Qu&eacutebec-Sant&eacute.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

We used four types of observational data, aggregated at the departmental level, published by Sant&eacute Publique France on the following web pages: https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/donnees-hospitalieres-relatives-a-lepidemie-de-covid-19/, https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/synthese-des-indicateurs-de-suivi-de-lepidemie-covid-19/, https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/donnees-relatives-aux-personnes-vaccinees-contre-la-covid-19-1/ https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/old-taux-dincidence-de-lepidemie-de-covid-19/

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Inclusion of first review: Discussion has been updated, paragraphs from the Supplementary Methods have been moved into the Methods section. Update on vaccine simulation numbers (slight inconsistencies in the % change numbers have been corrected). Supplemental files updated.

Data Availability

All data produced are available online at the following web pages: https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/donnees-hospitalieres-relatives-a-lepidemie-de-covid-19/, https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/synthese-des-indicateurs-de-suivi-de-lepidemie-covid-19/, https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/donnees-relatives-aux-personnes-vaccinees-contre-la-covid-19-1/, https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/old-taux-dincidence-de-lepidemie-de-covid-19/

https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/donnees-hospitalieres-relatives-a-lepidemie-de-covid-19/

https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/synthese-des-indicateurs-de-suivi-de-lepidemie-covid-19/

https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/donnees-relatives-aux-personnes-vaccinees-contre-la-covid-19-1/

https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/old-taux-dincidence-de-lepidemie-de-covid-19/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 05, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Estimating the population effectiveness of interventions against COVID-19 in France: a modelling study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Estimating the population effectiveness of interventions against COVID-19 in France: a modelling study
Iris Ganser, David L Buckeridge, Jane Heffernan, Mélanie Prague, Rodolphe Thiébaut
medRxiv 2023.09.14.23295425; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.14.23295425
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Estimating the population effectiveness of interventions against COVID-19 in France: a modelling study
Iris Ganser, David L Buckeridge, Jane Heffernan, Mélanie Prague, Rodolphe Thiébaut
medRxiv 2023.09.14.23295425; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.14.23295425

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)